Impact of Donor Age on Liver Transplant Outcomes in Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: A Cohort Study.

Background/Aims: Liver transplantation is the most effective treatment for the sickest patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). However, the influence of donor age on liver transplantation, especially in ACLF patients, is still unclear. Methods: In this study, we used the data of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We included patients with ACLF who received liver transplantation from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, and the total number was 13,857. We allocated the ACLF recipients by age into group I (donor age ≤17 years, n=647); group II (donor age 18-59 years, n=11,423); and group III (donor age ≥60 years, n=1,787). Overall survival (OS), graft survival, and mortality were compared among the three age groups and the four ACLF grades. Cox regression was also analyzed. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 89.6%, 85.5%, and 82.0% in group I; 89.4%, 83.4%, and 78.2% in group II; and 86.8%, 78.4%, and 71.4% in group III, respectively (p<0.001). When we analyzed the different effects of donor age on OS with different ACLF grades, in groups II and III, we observed statistical differences. Finally, the cubic spline curve told us that the relative death rate changed linearly with increasing donor age. Conclusions: Donor age is related to OS and graft survival of ACLF patients after transplantation, and poorer results were associated with elderly donors. In addition, different donor ages have different effects on recipients with different ACLF grades.

The impact of Karnofsky performance status on prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Functional performance as measured by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale has been linked to the outcomes of liver transplant patients; however, the effect of KPS on the outcomes of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) liver transplant population has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the association between pre-transplant KPS score and long-term outcomes in HCC patients listed for liver transplantation. METHODS: Adult HCC candidates listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2017 were grouped into group I (KPS 80-100%, n = 8,379), group II (KPS 50-70%, n = 8,091), and group III (KPS 10-40%, n = 1,256) based on percentage KPS score at listing. Survival was compared and multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Patients with low KPS score had a higher risk of removal from the waiting list. The 5-year intent-to-treat survival was 57.7% in group I, 53.2% in group II and 46.7% in group III (P < 0.001). The corresponding overall survival was 77.6%, 73.7% and 66.3% in three groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that KPS was an independent predictor of intent-to-treat survival (P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.19 [95%CI 1.07-1.31] for group II, P = 0.001; HR 1.63 [95%CI 1.34-1.99] for group III, P < 0.001) and overall survival(P < 0.001, reference group I; HR 1.16 [95%CI 1.05-1.28] for group II, P = 0.004; HR 1.53 [95%CI 1.26-1.87] for group III, P < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year recurrence rates was higher in group III patients (7.4%), compared with 5.2% in group I and 5.5% in group II (P = 0.037). However, this was not significant in the competing regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Low pre-transplant KPS score is associated with inferior long-term survival in liver transplant HCC patients, but is not significantly associated with post-transplant tumor recurrence.

Risk factors for stroke outcomes in adults: Stroke in China.

This study aimed to determine the possible risk factors for stroke outcomes based on prospective cohort study in China. A total of 146 stroke patients were recruited and divided into 2 groups, which assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), good outcomes (mRS <= 2) and poor outcomes group (mRS > 2). Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of participants were obtained from the medical record. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risk factors for stroke outcomes. Of 146 participants, 28 (19.18%) were presented with poor outcomes at day 90. As a result of multivariable logistic regression analysis, a significantly increased risk of stroke outcomes was found in patients with Barthel Index (BI) score (stroke (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.21 ~ 1.85, P < .001) and IS (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.20 ~ 1.83, P < .001)).

Impact of donor diabetes mellitus status on liver transplant outcomes in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective way to save patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). However, the impact of donor diabetes mellitus (DM) on LT outcomes in patients with ACLF has not been fully investigated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) between January 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2017 in this study. All the patients were divided into donors with DM and without DM group (DM: 1,394; non-DM: 11138). We compared the overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS) across different estimated ACLF (estACLF) grades between two groups. RESULTS: There were 25.10% estACLF-3 patients in the entire cohort. And in estACLF-3 patients, 318 patients had DM donors. The estACLF-3 associated 5-year OS rate in the non-DM group was 74.6%, significantly better than that in the DM group, with corresponding survival rate at 64.9% (P < 0.001). Donor DM was an independent predictor for OS in the entire cohort as well as in estACLF-3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Donor DM was associated with inferior outcomes of LT in patients with estACLF-3. However, the differences were not obvious in recipients with other estACLF grades.

The interaction of T2DM and BMI with NASH in recipients of liver transplants: an SRTR database analysis.

BACKGROUND: NASH-related liver transplants are increasing because of the obesity epidemic, but the influence of T2DM on various levels of BMI among NASH recipients is unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data retrieved from SRTR on 4,515 patients. We divided patients by BMI into five groups: normal weight; overweight; class 1 obesity; class 2 obesity; and class 3 obesity. Statistical analysis was done. RESULTS: Patients in the NASH group with T2DM had a lower patient and graft survival than patients without T2DM (5-year patient and graft survival: 77.5% vs. 79.8%; P = 0.001 and 76.4% vs. 78.2%; P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional regression showed an independent association between T2DM and decreased patient and graft survival (HR, 1.170; P = 0.015 and HR, 1.133; P = 0.048, respectively). In the lean and the class 3 obesity NASH groups, patients with T2DM had lower patient and graft survival than the patients without T2DM. In the class 3 obesity NASH group, T2DM was independently associated with decreased patient survival (HR, 1.581; P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our research reveals that the focus of the post-transplantation treatment should be different for different BMI patients.

Impact of donor age on liver transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the SRTR database.

BACKGROUND: Donor age is an important predictor for liver transplant recipients. Studies have not fully explored its impact on transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients as well as its involvement in tumor recurrence. METHODS: HCC patients who received liver transplants during 2010-2017 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were included. The recipients were divided into four groups based on donor age: I (≤ 34 years), II (35-49 years), III (50-64 years), and IV (≥ 65 years). Transplant outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), tumor recurrence, and risks, were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 13,276 HCC recipients were included in this study. Statistical significant differences were observed in OS among the four groups. The best 5-year survival was 76.0% in group I, followed by 73.5% in group II, 72.8% in group III, and 69.2% in group IV (P < 0.001). However, the liver-specific survival did not differ among these groups (P = 0.260). Donor age was found to be the independent predictor of OS after adjusting for other variables (P < 0.001, ref. group I; 1.087 (0.979-1.208) for group II, P = 0.119; 1.124 (1.015-1.246) for group III, P = 0.025; 1.395 (1.215-1.602) for group IV, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, OS was significantly different in recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but there was no significant difference for recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic liver diseases and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The post-transplant cumulative tumor recurrence rates were similar among the four groups (P = 0.382). CONCLUSIONS: Older donor age was associated with decreased OS but not liver-specific survival as well as post-transplant tumor recurrence in HCC recipients. Donor age also had different effects in patients with different underlying liver diseases.

Influence of dialysis duration on outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess how pre-transplant dialysis duration affects transplant outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: Data of 6887 T1DM patients who underwent SPK transplantation between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. According to pre-transplant dialysis duration, the patients were divided into the preemptive SPK, 0-2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years dialysis groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare patient and graft survival among the groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of transplant outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 56.7 ± 34.7 months. Compared with no dialysis or preemptive SPK, dialysis for 0-2 years was not significantly associated with patient or kidney graft survival, while long-term dialysis of 2-5 years and >5 years was significantly associated with increased risk of death and kidney graft failure. However, the duration of dialysis was not associated with pancreas graft survival. CONCLUSION: Long-term dialysis duration before SPK transplant is an independent predictor of patient death and kidney graft failure in T1DM patients.

Outcomes of liver-kidney transplantation in patients with primary hyperoxaluria: an analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is an inherited disease lacking of hepatic oxalic acid metabolic enzymes which could lead to irreverisible renal damage. Currently, liver-kidney transplantation is a curative but highly invasive therapy used to treat patients with PH. However, limited studies have focused on combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) and sequential liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) in patients with PH. METHODS: The present study included 201 patients with PH who received both liver and kidney transplants and who were listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1987 to 2018. According to the liver-kidney transplant procedure, patients were separated into a CLKT group and a SLKT group. Patient demographics and transplant outcomes were assessed in each group. RESULTS: Compared with the SLKT group, The CLKT group got a worse pretransplant dialysis condition in both the proportion of patients under pretransplant dialysis (p = 0.048) and the duration of the pretransplant dialysis (p < 0.001). The SLKT group got higher human leukocyte antigen mismatch score of kidney donor (p < 0.001) and liver donor (p = 0.003). The CLKT group utilized higher proportion (98.9%) of organs from a single deceased donor, while the SLKT group utilized 75.0% of organs from deceased liver donors and only 35.0% of organs from deceased kidney donors (p < 0.001). Kidney function measured by serum creatinine concentration before liver transplantation (LT) or CLKT was similar (p = 0.305) between groups. Patient survival was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.717) and liver (p = 0.685) and kidney (p = 0.464) graft outcomes were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SLKT seems to be an alternative option with strict condition for CLKT, further exploration about the SLKT is still required.