DDCM: A Computational Strategy for Drug Repositioning Based on Support-Vector Regression Algorithm.

Computational drug-repositioning technology is an effective tool for speeding up drug development. As biological data resources continue to grow, it becomes more important to find effective methods to identify potential therapeutic drugs for diseases. The effective use of valuable data has become a more rational and efficient approach to drug repositioning. The disease-drug correlation method (DDCM) proposed in this study is a novel approach that integrates data from multiple sources and different levels to predict potential treatments for diseases, utilizing support-vector regression (SVR). The DDCM approach resulted in potential therapeutic drugs for neoplasms and cardiovascular diseases by constructing a correlation hybrid matrix containing the respective similarities of drugs and diseases, implementing the SVR algorithm to predict the correlation scores, and undergoing a randomized perturbation and stepwise screening pipeline. Some potential therapeutic drugs were predicted by this approach. The potential therapeutic ability of these drugs has been well-validated in terms of the literature, function, drug target, and survival-essential genes. The method's feasibility was confirmed by comparing the predicted results with the classical method and conducting a co-drug analysis of the sub-branch. Our method challenges the conventional approach to studying disease-drug correlations and presents a fresh perspective for understanding the pathogenesis of diseases.

Pyrotinib as a salvage treatment for patients with HER-2 positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma after the progression of afatinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of afatinib or pyrotinib has been demonstrated in HER2-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, the efficacy of pyrotinib after afatinib progression has yet to be determined. METHOD: Patients with HER2 mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma administered afatinib or pyrotinib monotherapy were enrolled. Those who received pyrotinib after afatinib were further analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib after progression on afatinib. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. A swimming plot was used to describe the specific treatments. Additionally, patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) were established from HER2-amplified NSCLC patient samples to investigate the antitumor activity of pyrotinib in HER2-amplified tumor cells in vitro. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were enrolled, 13 of whom were administered pyrotinib after progression on afatinib. No statistical difference in PFS of pyrotinib was observed between patients whether be treated after afatinib progression or not (6.7 months vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.817), thus indicating that progression on afatinib did not affect the efficacy of pyrotinib. Further analysis was conducted on the former patients, which comprising eight patients administered interval chemotherapy after progression on afatinib. Two patients achieved PR after pyrotinib treatment. No independent factors were found to influence the PFS of pyrotinib. PDTOs confirmed the anti-tumor activity of pyrotinib in NSCLC tumor cells with HER2 amplification. CONCLUSIONS: Progression after prior afatinib treatment does not influence the efficacy of pyrotinib treatment. Pyrotinib may be a salvage option for patients with HER2 mutation who have experienced progression on afatinib.

Assessment of efficacy and safety of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with MET alterations.

Background: While targeted therapy has become the standard treatment for certain non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with gene mutation positivity, there remains a lack of enough reports of the efficacy of mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) alterations in the real world. Objectives: We aimed to explore the efficacy and toxicity of targeted therapy in NSCLC patients with different types of MET alterations and hope to provide more clinical medication guidance. Design: Designed different subgroups to compare the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy in NSCLC patients with MET alterations. Methods: We conducted analyses on the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (MET-TKI) therapy in NSCLC patients with MET alterations. Tumor response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 criteria, and both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Our study encompassed 116 NSCLC patients with MET alterations, including MET ex14 skipping mutation (n = 50), MET primary amplification (amp) (n = 25), and secondary amp (n = 41). Among treated patients, 34 achieved a partial response, while 52 exhibited stable disease. The overall response rate for the entire cohort was 29.31%, with a disease control rate of 74.14%. A significant difference was observed in the median PFS among patients with MET ex14 skipping mutation, MET primary amplification (amp), and secondary amp (10.4 versus 6.6 versus 4.5 months, p = 0.002). In all, 69 patients experienced drug-related adverse effects, with the most common being peripheral edema (35.34%), nausea and vomiting (21.55%), and fatigue (10.34%). In total, 29 patients (25%) encountered drug-related adverse reactions of grade 3 or higher. Conclusion: MET-TKI therapy works better for MET ex14 skipping mutation than other types of MET gene alteration. In the two MET amplified groups, the secondary amp was less effective. This study may provide more research support for the treatment of these patients.

Poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced thymic carcinoma patients with liver metastases.

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for advanced thymic carcinoma exhibits promising efficacy, factors that affect the efficacy and prognosis, including metastases sites, remain uncertain. Objectives: Our study aimed to investigate the determinants of survival among patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who underwent immunotherapy in real-world settings, with implications for clinical practice. Designs: Different therapy regimens of immunotherapy were produced to analyze the influence of liver metastases on survival and prognosis for advanced thymic carcinoma patients. Methods: Data for advanced thymic carcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy and their metastases sites were collected for analysis from seven different hospitals between January 2015 and January 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox analysis was used to evaluate factors influencing survival. Results: The present study analyzed 136 advanced thymic carcinoma patients from seven different hospitals.The PFS for all patients receiving immunotherapy was 6.4 months, while the OS was 24.0 months. The objective response rate was different for patients with liver and non-liver metastases (11.9% versus 37.2%, p = 0.003). The disease control rate values were also different between the two groups (47.6% versus 80.9%, p = 0.037). The PFS for patients with liver metastases demonstrated poor immunotherapy efficacy compared to patients with non-liver metastases (3.0 versus 8.0 months, p < 0.0001). The OS was also significantly different between these two patient groups (16.1 versus 29.1 months, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Immunotherapy had poor efficacy in advanced thymic carcinoma patients with liver metastases.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of immune-related hepatitis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study.

Background: With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), patients inevitably experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, the study was conducted on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis). Methods: We identified patients with advanced NSCLC who developed ir-hepatitis after immunotherapy between June 2016 and December 2022. Their irAEs were categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAE 4.03). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze survival. Results: A total of 35 patients were enrolled in the study. The numbers of mild (grade 1-2) and severe (grade 3-4) ir-hepatitis cases were 13 (grade 1, 3; grade 2, 10) and 22 (grade 3, 17; grade 4, 5), respectively. The median onset time of ir-hepatitis was 1.6 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 8.3 months. PFS differed between patients with early ir-hepatitis developing within two treatment cycles and those with ir-hepatitis developing more than two treatment cycles (5.5 vs. 12.7 months, P=0.004). Patients with severe rather than mild ir-hepatitis tended to poorer PFS survival (5.8 vs. 11.2 months, P=0.130). The appearance of ir-hepatitis within two treatment cycles (P=0.002) and higher severity grades of ir-hepatitis (P=0.005) were independent risk factors for PFS. Conclusions: Early and severe ir-hepatitis are associated with worse survival benefits, which still required more basic and perspective studies.

Efficacy and safety analysis of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET alterations.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) is a rare oncologic driver gene, and information on immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with this driver gene is limited. Here we evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) under different therapeutic regimen for NSCLC patients with MET alterations. METHODS: From June 2019 to December 2023, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in 42 NSCLC patients with MET alterations. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model applied for univariate and multivariate analyses. We assessed the size of target lesion according to RECIST v1.1, and objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), disease control rate (DCR) as the sum of CR, PR, and disease stable. RESULTS: A total of 42 NSCLC patients with MET alterations were included in this retrospective study, 10 was MET 14 skipping mutation and 32 was MET amplification. The ORR for ICI treatment was 30.95% and the DCR was 71.43%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 4.40 and 13.97 months, respectively. There exists statistical differences between the mPFS of ICI monotherapy and combine ICI therapy (2.8 vs 7.8 months, p = 0.022). The incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was 47.62%, mainly bone marrow suppression (14.28%), immune-related pneumonia (7.14%), and liver function impairment (7.14%), and six patients (14.28%) experiencing grade 3 or above adverse events. CONCLUSION: NSCLC patients with MET alterations can benefit from immunotherapy, especially the patients treated by combined ICI therapy. However, special attention should be paid to the occurrence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions while using the combined ICI therapy.

Exploration of efficacy of different therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation in the first-line treatment.

PURPOSE: The treatment of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutation has been closely paid more attention. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different first-line regimens in advanced KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: In our retrospective study, we collected patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and May 2023. We analyzed the benefit of different first-line therapy according to theraputic methods and the differential effect of the same treatment method among KRAS-mutated subtypes. We divided the patients into group A (A1, chemotherapy alone; A2, immunotherapy alone) and group B (B1, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy; B2, chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy; B3, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to reflect the PFS and OS of different methods. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluated the response. RESULTS: We enrolled 227 patients including eighty-two with KRAS G12C mutation. The ORR and DCR of first-line treatment in the overall population were 32.2% and 80.6% respectively. The median PFS was 6.7 months and the median OS was 17.4 months for the overall population. The PFS of the Group B was significantly better than that of the Group A (7.7 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.003), while no significant difference in OS was observed (19.4 months vs 15.0 months, P = 0.077). In the Group B, chemotherapy combined immunotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (14.1 months vs 7.7 months, P = 0.049), and OS also showed that tendency of difference (31.9 months vs 19.3 months, P = 0.158). There was no statistically significant difference between KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutation according to first-line treatment methods, whereas patients with TP53 co-mutation showed a better survival benefit (OS, 23.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In the first-line treatment, combination regimen has advantages over single regimen. Among them, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy can achieve significant efficacy benefits.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib, as a salvage treatment for patients after failure of third-line or later-line treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has shown efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with immunotherapy for SCLC with BMs remain unclear. METHOD: Patients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and February 2023 were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (iPFS). A waterfall diagram was used to indicate changes in intracranial lesions. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included; 29 received anlotinib alone, and 19 were administered anlotinib plus ICI. Combination therapy, compared with anlotinib, was associated with significantly longer PFS and iPFS (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.004). Similar results were observed in patients with multiple BMs (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.002). After third-line or later-line treatments, patients treated with ICI plus anlotinib also achieved significant PFS and iPFS benefits (PFS: 8.4 months vs. 2.1 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 9.2 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002). No new or severe adverse events were observed with combination therapy. CONCLUSION: The combination of anlotinib and ICI has promising intracranial and extracranial efficacy with tolerable toxicity, and may be a therapeutic option for SCLC patients with BMs.

Global Reactivity Profiling of the Catalytic Lysine in Human Kinome for Covalent Inhibitor Development.

Advances in targeted covalent inhibitors (TCIs) have been made by using lysine-reactive chemistries. Few aminophiles possessing balanced reactivity/stability for the development of cell-active TCIs are however available. We report herein lysine-reactive activity-based probes (ABPs; 2-14) based on the chemistry of aryl fluorosulfates (ArOSO2 F) capable of global reactivity profiling of the catalytic lysine in human kinome from mammalian cells. We concurrently developed reversible covalent ABPs (15/16) by installing salicylaldehydes (SA) onto a promiscuous kinase-binding scaffold. The stability and amine reactivity of these probes exhibited a broad range of tunability. X-ray crystallography and mass spectrometry (MS) confirmed the successful covalent engagement between ArOSO2 F on 9 and the catalytic lysine of SRC kinase. Chemoproteomic studies enabled the profiling of >300 endogenous kinases, thus providing a global landscape of ligandable catalytic lysines of the kinome. By further introducing these aminophiles into VX-680 (a noncovalent inhibitor of AURKA kinase), we generated novel lysine-reactive TCIs that exhibited excellent in vitro potency and reasonable cellular activities with prolonged residence time. Our work serves as a general guide for the development of lysine-reactive ArOSO2 F-based TCIs.

Efficacy of rechallenge immunotherapy after immune monotherapy resistance in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Drug resistance inevitably occurs despite the encouraging results of immunotherapy. This study attempted to investigate immunotherapy rechallenge treatment regimens and factors associated with outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to resistance status. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with advanced NSCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and immune rechallenge between March 2016 and December 2022. Primary resistance (RR) was defined by an absence of response after treatment administered for less than 6 months before progression. Acquired resistance (AR) was defined as a response to immunotherapy treatment administered for more than 6 months before progression. Disease progression in as many as three lesions was defined as systemic progression, whereas disease progression in fewer than three lesions was defined as oligo-progression. RESULTS: Of 40 patients, 18 (45%) had primary resistance, and 22 (55%) developed AR. Overall survival (OS) was not reached. A significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in individuals rechallenged with ICIs after AR and RR (7.0 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.003). Patients receiving interval treatment before rechallenge achieved longer PFS than those who did not (6.2 months vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that systemic progression was a risk factor significantly associated with PFS after ICI rechallenge (P = 0.006). After AR, ICI rechallenge prolonged the duration of PFS if patients developed oligo-progression (5.4 months vs. 1.1 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ICI rechallenge is likely to be an option for patients with oligo-progression during rechallenge, particularly after AR.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Myocarditis is a rare immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with high mortality rates, with few reports on its clinical characteristics and prognostic impact. This study designed to explore the associations between cardiac parameters and outcomes of myocarditis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Fourteen patients diagnosed with ICI-associated myocarditis by clinicians were admitted to the study analysis. By Cox univariate and multivariate survival analyses, potential risk factors for the development of severe myocarditis were identified. Survival analysis was also performed to explore the prognosis of patients with myocarditis. Among patients with myocarditis, higher B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (P = 0.04) and conduction block (P = 0.03) were associated with progression to severe myocarditis. In addition, high lactate dehydrogenase (LHD) levels (P = .04) and myocarditis onset within 2 months (P = 0.02) were prognostic factors of severe myocarditis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time and median overall survival (OS) time for all patients were 5.9 months and 18.5 months, respectively. However, there were no statistical differences between mild and severe cohorts in terms of PFS and OS (PFS: 4.5 vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.17; OS: 21.3 vs. 18.5months, P = 0.36). And we found that the earlier occurrence of myocarditis, worse PFS prognosis (4.5 months vs. 10.5 months, P = 0.008), while no difference in OS (18.5 months vs. 21.3 months, P = 0.35). Compared to mild myocarditis, severe myocarditis presented with higher BNP levels and cardiac conduction abnormalities. In addition, patients with mild and early myocarditis tended to have better survival rates.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Background: Lung large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L-LCNEC) is a rare and highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. There is currently no standard therapeutic regimen, and systemic chemotherapy results in poor prognosis. Due to the rarity of L-LCNEC, the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unclear. Methods: This study included 34 L-LCNEC patients administered ICIs at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, from February 6, 2018 to February 6, 2023. The treatment responses were evaluated. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) of 34 patients was 29.4%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 82.4%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.30 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.77 months. The ORRs of combined LCNEC (n=7) and pure LCNEC (n=27) were 14.3% and 33.3%; the DCRs were 100% and 77.8%; the median PFSs were 12.48 and 5.6 months (P=0.032); and the median OSs were 21.27 and 14.73 months, respectively (P=0.233). The observed incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 61.8%, primarily occurring in grades 1/2 (58.8%) and grade 3 (5.9%). Elevated aminotransferases (14.7%), pneumonia (8.8%), and fatigue (8.8%) were the most common irAEs. Conclusions: ICIs treatment showed efficacy and safety in advanced L-LCNEC, with the potential for greater benefits in the combined LCNEC subtype.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of second- and third-generation TKIs for non-small-cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of definite for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been preliminarily demonstrated. However, there is a paucity of data with which to compare the efficacy and safety of second- and third-generation TKIs in patients with NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations. METHODS: We compared the efficacy and safety of second- and third-generation TKIs in all NSCLC patients in whom next-generation sequencing confirmed uncommon EGFR mutations, including G719X, S768I, and L861Q. The parameters analyzed included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reflected the safety of these TKIs. RESULTS: Eighty-four NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations were enrolled between April 2016 and May 2022 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, including 63 treated with second-generation TKIs and 21 treated with third-generation TKIs. The ORR for all patients receiving TKIs was 47.6%, and the DCR was 86.9%. The median PFS for NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations receiving TKIs was 11.9 months and OS was 30.6 months. There was no significant difference in PFS after treatment with second- or third-generation TKIs (13.3 vs. 11.0 months, respectively, P = 0.910) or in OS (30.6 vs. 24.6 months, respectively P = 0.623). The third-generation TKIs showed no severe toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of second- and third-generation TKIs for NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations does not differ, and so can be used to treat NSCLC patients with these mutations.

Comparison of the immunotherapy efficacy between invasive mucinous and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma in advanced lung cancer patients with KRAS mutation: a retrospective study.

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a rare variant of adenocarcinoma with unique clinical, radiological, and pathological features, among which KRAS mutation is the most common. However, the differences in the efficacy of immunotherapy between KRAS-positive IMA and invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) patients remain unclear. Patients with KRAS mutated adenocarcinomas receiving immunotherapy between June 2016 and December 2022 were enrolled. Based on mucin-producing status, the patients were placed into two subgroups: the IMA group and INMA group. Patients with IMA were further classified into two subtypes according to the presence of mucin patterns: pure IMA (≥ 90%) and mixed mucinous/nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (≥ 10% of each histological component). Kaplan-Meier Curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze survival. Cox regression analysis of PFS were used to analyze the independent factors associated with efficacy. Sixty-five advanced adenocarcinoma patients with KRAS mutations received immunotherapy, including 24 patients with IMA and 41 with INMA. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months, whereas the median overall survival (OS) was 24.0 months. Significant difference in PFS could be observed in IMA and INMA (3.5 months vs. 8.9 months; P = 0.047). Patients with pure IMA tended toward prolonger survival in contrast to mixed mucinous/nonmucinous adenocarcinoma in PFS (8.4 months vs. 2.3 months; P = 0.349). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that IMA was an independent risk factor for PFS. In KRAS mutated patients, IMA was associated with poorer PFS after immunotherapy compared with INMA.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond first-line progression with prior immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Immunotherapy, monotherapy, and immunotherapy plus platinum-based chemotherapy are the standard treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with negative driver genes. However, the impact of similar continuing immunotherapy beyond progression (IBP) of first-line immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC has not yet been shown. This study aimed to estimate the impact of immunotherapy beyond first-line progression (IBF) and evaluate the factors associated with second-line efficacity. Methods: Ninety-four cases of advanced NSCLC patients with progressive disease (PD) post first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy plus immunotherapy and administrated prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between November 2017 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were applied to determine predictive factors independently associated with second-line efficacity. Results: A total of 94 patients were incorporated in this study. Patients who continued the original ICIs after initial PD were defined as IBF (n=42), whereas those who discontinued immunotherapy were defined as non-IBF (n=52). The second-line objective response rates (ORR, ORR = CR + PR) of patients in the IBF and non-IBF groups were 13.5% vs. 28.6%, respectively (P=0.070). No significant survival difference was found between patients in the IBF and non-IBF groups in first-line median progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS1, 6.2 vs. 5.1 months, P=0.490), second-line median PFS (mPFS2, 4.5 vs. 2.6 months, P=0.216), or median overall survival (OS) (mOS, 14.4 vs. 8.3 months, P=0.188). However, the benefits inPFS2 were observed in individuals performed PFS1 >6 months (group A) than those of PFS1 ≤6 months (group B) (median PFS2, 4.6 vs. 3.2 months, P=0.038). Multivariate analyses did not reveal any independent prognostic factors for efficacy. Conclusions: The benefits of continuing prior ICIs administration beyond first-line immunotherapy progression might not be obvious in patients with advanced NSCLC, but those first line treatment showed a longer period may receive efficacy benefits.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced lung adenosquamous carcinoma.

Background: Primary adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the lung is a rare and aggressive disease and limited information is available on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for this disease. Here, we evaluated the expression status of programmed death-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) and efficacy of ICIs in patients with pulmonary ASC. Methods: The efficacy and toxicity of ICIs were examined in 38 patients with previously treated lung ASC from November 2017 to October 2021 in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, China). Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model applied for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 38 patients with ASC were included in this retrospective study. ICI treatment induced an objective response rate (ORR) of 23.7% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 86.8%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 5.47 and 24.10 months, respectively. Seventeen patients were successfully evaluated for PD-L1 expression status, with 11 (64.7%) identified as PD-L1-positive. ORR and DCR for PD-L1-positive patients were 36.4% (4/11) and 100% (11/11) and the corresponding values for PD-L1-negative patients were 0 (0/6) and 50% (3/6), respectively. The median PFS of PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patient groups was 5.00 and 1.90 months (P=0.166) while the median OS was 11.30 months and not reached, respectively (P=0.966). The incidence rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 52.6%, with 13.2% grade 3-4 irAEs. The most common irAEs were malaise and pneumonitis. One patient died of pneumonitis during the study. Conclusions: ICIs show considerable potential as a treatment option for lung ASC. PFS and OS rates are similar for PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients. Further large-scale studies are required to establish the relationship between PD-L1 expression and response to ICIs in ASC.

Guiding Drug Repositioning for Cancers Based on Drug Similarity Networks.

Drug repositioning aims to discover novel clinical benefits of existing drugs, is an effective way to develop drugs for complex diseases such as cancer and may facilitate the process of traditional drug development. Meanwhile, network-based computational biology approaches, which allow the integration of information from different aspects to understand the relationships between biomolecules, has been successfully applied to drug repurposing. In this work, we developed a new strategy for network-based drug repositioning against cancer. Combining the mechanism of action and clinical efficacy of the drugs, a cancer-related drug similarity network was constructed, and the correlation score of each drug with a specific cancer was quantified. The top 5% of scoring drugs were reviewed for stability and druggable potential to identify potential repositionable drugs. Of the 11 potentially repurposable drugs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 10 were confirmed by clinical trial articles and databases. The targets of these drugs were significantly enriched in cancer-related pathways and significantly associated with the prognosis of NSCLC. In light of the successful application of our approach to colorectal cancer as well, it provides an effective clue and valuable perspective for drug repurposing in cancer.

Concentration-Dependent Enrichment Identifies Primary Protein Targets of Multitarget Bioactive Molecules.

Multitarget bioactive molecules (MBMs) are of increasing importance in drug discovery as they could produce high efficacy and a low chance of resistance. Several advanced approaches of quantitative proteomics were developed to accurately identify the protein targets of MBMs, but little study has been carried out in a sequential manner to identify primary protein targets (PPTs) of MBMs. This set of proteins will first interact with MBMs in the temporal order and play an important role in the mode of action of MBMs, especially when MBMs are at low concentrations. Herein, we describe a valuable observation that the result of the enrichment process is highly dependent on concentrations of the probe and the proteome. Interestingly, high concentrations of probe and low concentrations of incubated proteome will readily miss the hyper-reactive protein targets and thereby increase the probability of rendering PPTs with false-negative results, while low concentrations of probe and high concentrations of incubated proteome more than likely will capture the PPTs. Based on this enlightening observation, we developed a proof-of-concept approach to identify the PPTs of iodoacetamide, a thiol-reactive MBM. This study will deepen our understanding of the enrichment process and improve the accuracy of pull-down-guided target identification.

Efficacy of EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring rare EGFR mutations of exon 18 E709X.

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show efficacy against lung cancer, and afatinib has been used as a standard therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR rare mutations such as S768I, G719X, and L861Q. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs against NSCLC with EGFR rare mutations of exon 18 E709X has been less studied. The present study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients with rare mutations. Our study enrolled 15 NSCLC patients with exon 18 E709X mutation who were admitted to Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed. The ORR of the entire cohort of patients was 33.3%. The PFS of all patients with exon 18 E709X mutations was 10.9 months. The OS was not reached. The PFS of patients with exon 18 E709-T710delinsD and E709A/G/K mutations showed no significant difference (5.3 vs. 13.5 months, P = 0.238). A significant difference in OS was observed between patients with exon 18 E709-T710delinsD mutation and those with E709A/G/K mutation (12.2 months vs. not reached, P = 0.029). No significant difference in efficacy was observed between second- and third-generation TKIs for NSCLC patients with exon 18 E709X mutations (PFS: 13.5 vs. 10.9 months, P = 0.774; OS: 17.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.072). New treatment-related adverse events were not observed. NSCLC patients with exon 18 E709X mutations may benefit from treatment with second- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Leader gene identification for digestive system cancers based on human subcellular location and cancer-related characteristics in protein-protein interaction networks.

Stomach, liver, and colon cancers are the most common digestive system cancers leading to mortality. Cancer leader genes were identified in the current study as the genes that contribute to tumor initiation and could shed light on the molecular mechanisms in tumorigenesis. An integrated procedure was proposed to identify cancer leader genes based on subcellular location information and cancer-related characteristics considering the effects of nodes on their neighbors in human protein-protein interaction networks. A total of 69, 43, and 64 leader genes were identified for stomach, liver, and colon cancers, respectively. Furthermore, literature reviews and experimental data including protein expression levels and independent datasets from other databases all verified their association with corresponding cancer types. These final leader genes were expected to be used as diagnostic biomarkers and targets for new treatment strategies. The procedure for identifying cancer leader genes could be expanded to open up a window into the mechanisms, early diagnosis, and treatment of other cancer types.