Value of Magnifying Endoscopy With Narrow-Band Imaging and Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Detecting Gastric Cancerous Lesions.

Although the respective potentials of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) in predicting gastric cancer has been well documented, there is a lack of studies in comparing the value and diagnostic strategy of these 2 modalities. Our primary aim is to investigate whether CLE is superior to ME-NBI for differentiation between gastric cancerous and noncancerous lesions. A secondary aim is to propose an applicable clinical strategy.We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study involving patients with suspected gastric superficial cancerous lesions. White light endoscopy, ME-NBI, and CLE were performed diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value between ME-NBI and CLE were assessed, as well as agreements between ME-NBI/CLE and histopathology.This study involved 86 gastric lesions in 82 consecutive patients who underwent white light endoscopy, ME-NBI, and CLE before biopsy. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for ME-NBI were 93.75%, 91.67%, and 95.45%, compared with 91.86%, 90%, and 93.48%, respectively, for CLE, for discrimination cancerous/noncancerous lesion (all P > 0.05). For undifferentiated/differentiated adenocarcinoma, CLE had a numerically but not statistically significantly higher accuracy than ME-NBI (81.25% vs 73.33%, P = 0.46). Agreements between ME-NBI/CLE and histopathology were near perfect (ME-NBI, κ = 0.87; CLE, κ = 0.84).CLE is not superior to ME-NBI for discriminating gastric cancerous from noncancerous lesions. Endoscopist could make an optimal choice according to the specific indication and advantages of ME-NBI and CLE in daily practices.

Long-term outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with rebleeding and long-term outcomes after capsule endoscopy (CE) for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) in a follow-up study. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who underwent CE due to OGIB from June 2002 to January 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with rebleeding, while Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were used to analyze cumulative rebleeding rates. RESULTS: The overall rebleeding rate after CE in patients with OGIB was 28.6% (97/339) during a median follow-up of 48 months (range 12-112 months). Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥60 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.473, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.576-3.881, P = 0.000), positive CE findings (HR 3.393, 95% CI 1.931-5.963, P = 0.000), hemoglobin ≤70 g/L before CE (HR 2.010, 95% CI 1.261-3.206, P = 0.003), nonspecific treatments (HR 2.500, 95% CI 1.625-3.848, P = 0.000) and the use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after CE (HR 2.851, 95% CI 1.433-5.674, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors associated with rebleeding. Univariate analysis showed that chronic hepatitis was independently associated with rebleeding in CE-negative patients (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: CE has a significant impact on the long-term outcome of patients with OGIB. Further investigation and close follow-up in patients with OGIB and those with negative CE findings are necessary.

Minimally invasive treatment of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 69 consecutive patients who underwent LECS, including laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic resection (LAER) and endoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (EAWR), for pathologically confirmed gastric GISTs of less than 5 cm in diameter from January 2006 to October 2012. RESULTS: The tumor was located at the upper third of the stomach in 22 patients, the middle third in 38 and the lower third in nine, with a mean tumor size of 2.8 ± 1.6 cm. The operating time was 81.6 ± 31.8 min in the LAER group and 86.3 ± 28.5 min in the EAWR group (P = 0.776). Intraoperative blood loss was 29.8 ± 15.4 mL in the LAER group and 31.4 ± 11.6 mL in the EAWR group (P = 0.561). Most patients had a very low or low risk of tumor recurrence, while six had an intermediate risk of tumor recurrence. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.6 days. Only two patients had postoperative complications after LECS, both of whom were treated successfully without open surgery. During a median follow-up of 35 months, all patients were disease-free, with no tumor recurrence or metastases. CONCLUSION: LECS is a minimally invasive and safe alternative approach which can achieve fast recovery and satisfactory short-term outcomes for appropriately selected patients with gastric GISTs.

Assessment of capsule endoscopy scoring index, clinical disease activity, and C-reactive protein in small bowel Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Small bowel Crohn's disease (SBCD) patients are frequently assessed by capsule endoscopy (CE), which enables direct visualization of small bowel mucosal abnormalities; however, the correlations between CE scoring index (CESI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and disease activity indices remain undefined. We aimed to determine correlations between the CESI, clinical disease activity indices, and CRP in SBCD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between October 2008 and February 2011 on 58 established SBCD patients and suspected patients who received a definitive SBCD diagnosis during study. Patients underwent complete CE and were scored according to the CESI and Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Statistical correlation among CESI, HBI, and CRP was assessed. RESULTS: Weak, but significant, correlations were found between CESI and HBI (r = 0.4, P < 0.01). The correlation between CESI and CRP was moderate (r = 0.58, P < 0.01). The median CRP value was significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe CESI compared with the mild group (22.60 ± 16.79 mg/L vs 11.88 ± 8.39 mg/L, P < 0.01). Changes between baseline and follow-up CESI failed to correlate with the delta-HBI or delta-CRP (both, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of SBCD patients, clinical disease activity index was not reliable predictors of mucosal inflammation. CRP, however, might be a useful inflammatory marker for evaluating the moderate to severe CE activity in SBCD patients. Furthermore, therapy-induced clinical and biological improvement was not associated with repair of SBCD mucosal lesions.

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of severity and extent of ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in detecting the severity and extent of active ulcerative colitis (UC), in comparison with conventional endoscopy. METHODS: From July 2009 to June 2012, patients with confirmed UC were enrolled in this prospective single-center study. After they had undergone the PCCE, they received a conventional colonoscopy. The extent of mucosal damage and inflammatory lesions during both procedures was recorded for comparison. In addition, the regimen of bowel preparation, completion rate, colonic cleansing, compliance or adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients was consecutively included, among whom one was withdrawn. The remaining 25 (nine females and 16 males with a mean age of 44.2 years) completed the study. There was significant correlation in the severity (κ = 0.751, P < 0.001) and extent (κ = 0.522, P < 0.001) of UC between the PCCE and conventional colonoscopy. In addition, the excellent to good rate of colonic cleanliness in PCCE was 80%. There were no remarkable adverse events during the study. CONCLUSION: PCCE provides an outstanding performance in the detection of the severity and extent of active UC.

[Clinical analysis of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: report of 46 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for treating gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 46 patients with gastric GIST undergoing laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery between June 2009 and June 2011 at the Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. RESULTS: There were 27 males and 19 females with the mean age of 58.5 years. Thirty-three patients received endoscopy-assisted wedge resection, and 13 cases received laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic resection. All the operations were successful. The mean operative time was (85.5±29.3) min, the mean blood loss was (31.4±12.2) ml, the mean post-operative gastrointestinal functional recovery time was (31.6±14.9) h, and the mean post-operative hospital stay was (5.1±2.9) d. No post-operative complication occurred. NIH risk assessment showed that 34 cases were very low risk and 12 low risk. No recurrence or metastasis was found during the follow-up ranging from 2 to 26 months(median, 12.6 months). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric GIST is both feasible and safe with minimal invasiveness, fast recovery and satisfactory short-term outcomes.