ABSTRACT
Objective:As the problem of global aging intensifies,postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) has become a global health problem among females. At present,the commonly used biological agents have been proved not suitable for long-term use due to multiple adverse reactions. Several Meta-analyses have confirmed the good safety and effectiveness of kidney-tonifying method against PMOP,but its therapeutic mechanism remains unclear. The purpose of this Meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of kidney-tonifying method on osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor(OPG)/receptor activator of nuclear transcription factor (NF)-<italic>κ</italic>B (RANK)/receptor activator of NF-<italic>κ</italic>B ligand (RANKL) signaling pathway in PMOP animal model,so as to provide an experimental basis for the treatment of PMOP with kidney-tonifying method. Method:The related articles were retrieved from PubMed,Ovid Medline,Embase,China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI),Chongqing Weipu Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP),and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform with the retrieval time set from their inception to January 2020. The quality of each included article was evaluated using the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. Then RevMan 5.3 was utilized for Meta-analysis according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology. Result:Thirty-two studies involving 619 rats were included. The quality score of these studies ranged from 3 to 5 points. The results of the Meta-analysis indicated obvious advantages of kidney-tonifying method in increasing bone mineral density (BMD)[standardized mean difference (SMD)=2.01,95% confidence interval(CI)=1.50-2.52,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01]),serum OPG level (SMD=3.33,95% CI=2.59-4.07,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01),and OPG mRNA expression (SMD=11.81,95% CI=7.49-16.13,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01),promoting OPG protein production (SMD=4.95,95% CI=3.09-6.81,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01),reducing serum RANKL(SMD=-4.88,95% CI=-6.01--3.75,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01) and RANK levels (SMD=-7.30,95% CI=-9.53--5.07,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01),and down-regulating RANKL (SMD=-6.22,95%CI=-8.95--3.49,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01) and RANK mRNA (SMD=-3.18,95% CI=-6.19--0.18,<italic>P</italic><0.05) expression and RANKL protein expression in bone tissue (SMD=-3.99,95% CI=-5.47--2.50,<italic>P</italic><0.000 01). Conclusion:The kidney-tonifying method has been proved to possess potential advantages in regulating the balance of OPG/RANK/RANKL signaling pathway in PMOP animal model. Nevertheless,more large-sample sized,properly designed,and high-quality animal experiments are still needed for further verification.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To systematically evaluate the effect and safety of Xuezhikang Capsule (XZKC) for adjuvant treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients accompanied with or without dyslipidemia.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Database, Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), Wanfang Data base, Cochrane Library, and Medline (PubMed) were retrieved with the deadline of August 30, 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of XZKC in treating CHD patients with or without dyslipidemia were all included. Assessment of bias risk for included studies was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention (Version 5.0.2): Criteria for judging risk of bias in the "risk of bias" assessment tool. Review Management (5.1.0) was employed for data statistics. If there was no significant heterogeneity, results from the random-effect model were presented. If the heterogeneity was not substantial, a meta-analysis was not performed and a narrative and qualitative summary was performed instead.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 28 RCTs (6,949 patients) were included after screening results. The methodological quality of included trial was generally lower. Results of Metaanalysis showed that XZKC was beneficial for CHD patients in decreasing cardiovascular events: when compared with the basic treatment group, the relative risk (RR) was 0.53 and 95% confidence interval (CI) was [0.35, 0.81]; when compared with the placebo + basic treatment group, RR was 0.52 and 95% CI was [0.42, 0.65]; when compared with the basic treatment group, RR for improving symptoms of angina was 1.20 and 95% CI was [1. 12, 1.30]; when compared with the basic treatment group, RR for improving abnormal ECG was 1.38 and 95% CI was [1.21, 1.57]. Thirteen studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering total cholesterol (TC) to that of the basic treatment group. Three studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering total cholesterol (TC) to that of the placebo + basic treatment group. Thirteen studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to that of the basic treatment group. Three studies showed that XZKC + basic treatment was obviously superior in lowering LDL-C to that of the placebo + basic treatment group. A total of 18 studies describing adverse reactions (ADs) involved 61 ADs in the XZKC + basic treatment group. All suffered from mild symptoms or were improved after treatment. No severe ADs occurred.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Treatment of CHD by XZKC might lower the occurrence of cardiovascular events in CHD patients accompanied with or without dyslipidemia, relieve clinical symptoms, improve ECG, lower blood lipid levels, and with less adverse reactions.</p>