[The clinical pharmacist, an essential element in the new gradation of care for ambulatory patients]. / Le pharmacien clinicien, un maillon indispensable dans la nouvelle gradation de prise en charge des patients ambulatoires.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical presence in oncology allows the clinical pharmacist to integrate tripartite consultations for primary prescription of oral anticancer drugs. The aim of the study is to describe the deployment of the clinical pharmacy activity in 2 oncology departments since its implementation in 2019, to assess the financial gain of the pharmaceutical interventions through the new gradation of outpatient management published on September 10, 2020, and finally to assess their satisfaction following the deployment of this pathway. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted to collect pricing data for oral therapy interviews in patients between January 2019 and December 2022. To complement this, a satisfaction survey was conducted by the oral therapy pharmaceutical team between 01/01/2022 and 12/31/2022 among patients undergoing treatment. RESULTS: 579 patients received a targeted pharmaceutical interview as part of the oral therapy patient pathway. The average invoiced amount of a pharmaceutical consultation carried out as part of a tripartite first prescription was 355.44 euros. The 579 patients who benefited from a targeted pharmaceutical interview generated a revenue of 87,545 euros for the hospital. In terms of evaluating patient satisfaction, 163 usable responses were received out of 267 patients questioned, representing a response rate of 61%, with an overall score of 9.1/10. CONCLUSION: Pending the introduction of a specific remuneration for clinical pharmacy activities, the valuation of tripartite consultations is a lever for financing clinical pharmacy activities in hospitals.

Outcomes of targeted treatment in immunocompromised patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19: a retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of targeted COVID-19 treatments in immunocompromised patients with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 during the period of expansion of the different Omicron subvariants in France. A retrospective monocentric observational study was performed. All immunocompromised patients aged 18 or more, with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19, and who had received a targeted treatment with sotrovimab, tixagevimab/cilgavimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir at the Bordeaux University Hospital from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022 were eligible. The primary outcomes of interest was defined as a composite of either (i) progression to moderate (WHO-Clinical Progression Scale at 4 or 5) or severe COVID-19 (WHO-CPS ≥ 6), or (ii) the occurrence of COVID-19-related death. The secondary outcomes of interest were the components of the primary outcome. Outcomes were collected until day 30 after targeted treatment administration or at discharge for patients still hospitalised in relation with COVID-19 at day 30. 223 immunocompromised patients received targeted treatment for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19: 114 received sotrovimab, 50 tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 49 nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, and 10 remdesivir. Among 223 treated patients, 10 (4.5%) progressed to moderate or severe disease: three patients (1.3%) progressed to moderate COVID-19 and 7 (3.1%) patients progressed to severe disease. Among them, 4 (1.8%) died of COVID-19. More than 95% of immunocompromised patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19 treated by targeted therapies during the Omicron subvariants era did not progress to moderate or severe disease.

[Benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators in the management of autoimmune diseases]. / Intérêt des dosages pharmacologiques d'immunosuppresseurs et immunomodulateurs dans la prise en charge des maladies autoimmunes.

The pharmacokinetics of drugs, such as immunosuppressants, justify the need of measuring their blood concentrations in order to adjust their dosage. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of ciclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has shown its benefit particularly in the management of renal transplantees, in order to prevent graft rejection. When prescribed in autoimmune diseases, their pharmacokinetic variability and the variability of clinical response would justify TDM in practice. TDM may be useful in systemic lupus, for hydroxychloroquine, in order to monitor patient compliance. Despite insufficient data in the literature, for mycophenolate mofetil, TDM would permit to maintain clinical remission in adults and children with lupus nephritis, as well as in mucosal pemphigoid and idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. Studies are still necessary to validate the thresholds and TDM conditions. For azathioprine, TPMT phenotyping is recommended before prescription. For methotrexate, tacrolimus and ciclosporin, data are still sparse on the benefit of TDM, although it may improve tolerance to tacrolimus in lupus. Finally, for infliximab, in case of loss of response in maintenance, TDM may be proposed in parallel with detection of anti-drug antibodies.

Diffusion of oral and intravenous 400 mg once-daily moxifloxacin into lung tissue at pharmacokinetic steady-state.

The degree of penetration of an antibiotic into the infection site is an important factor for its therapeutic efficacy, particularly in respiratory tract infections. In the present study, we examined the lung tissue diffusion of moxifloxacin at a dose of 400 mg administered intravenously or orally once-daily, and the results were correlated to microbiological data to estimate the clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin in lower community-acquired respiratory infections. This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial, open-label, single-center study. Patients undergoing lung surgery for bronchial cancer which necessitates the removal of an anatomical piece of lung tissue were randomized into twelve treatment groups, dependent upon the time of surgery and the moxifloxacin formulation, i.v. or oral, administered. During surgery, one blood sample was taken at the time of tissue collection to determine moxifloxacin plasma concentration. At the same time, tissue samples were taken by pulmonary exeresis. A validated new high performance liquid chromatography assay was used to determine moxifloxacin concentrations in plasma and lung tissue. A total of 49 patients (25 for i.v. administration, 24 for oral administration, 44 men and 5 women, mean age, 61 years, mean body weight, 72 kg, mean creatinine clearance was 84 ml/min/1.73 m2) were enrolled. The mean +/- SD steady-state moxifloxacin ratios between lung and plasma concentrations were respectively: 3.53 +/- 1.89 and 4.36 +/- 1.48 for i.v. and oral administration. The mean steady-state moxifloxacin maximal lung concentrations (Cmax) were respectively 12.37 microg/g and 16.21 microg/g for i.v. and oral administration. Moxifloxacin both intravenously and orally exhibits high penetration in lung tissue, with tissue concentrations far above the MIC90s for most of the susceptible pathogens commonly involved, thus underlining its suitability for the treatment of community-acquired, lower respiratory tract infections.