[Comparative study of endoscopic mucous resection with transparent cap and endoscopic multi-band mucosectomy for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesion].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucous resection with transparent cap (EMR-Cap) and endoscopic multi-band mucosectomy (MBM) in the treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesion. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to review 30 EMR-Cap cases from December 2008 to December 2009 and 32 MBM cases from January 2010 to January 2011 of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. The differences between these two techniques in efficacy, safety, and cost were compared. RESULTS: In EMR-Cap group, the median resection time was 26(10-56) min and median procedure time was 43(22-81) min, significantly longer than those in MBM group [10(7-18) min and 32(28-45) min, P=0.036 and 0.038, respectively]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in total thickness and depth of resected lesions (P>0.05). In EMR-Cap group, the median cost was significantly higher than that of MBM group [(5466±354) vs. (4014±368) RMB, P=0.008)]. CONCLUSIONS: EMR-Cap and MBM are minimally invasive, safe and effective methods in the treatment of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. Compared to the EMR-Cap, MBM is simple with shorter treatment time and lower cost.

[Value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in hilar and mediastinal lesions].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in cases of undiagnosed intrapulmonary lesions. METHODS: A total of 89 patients with intrathoracic lesions underwent EBUS-TBNA, including 56 pulmonary lesions, 7 lymph node staging in lung cancer patients, 21 unknown hilar and/or mediastinal lymphadenopathies and 5 mediastinal tumors. All samples were evaluated for cytological and pathological examinations. RESULTS: No complication of EBUS-TBNA was observed. Among 89 cases, 76 had positive results, 5 negative and 5 cases excluded as unsatisfied samples. In 56 patients with pulmonary lesions, EBUS-TBNA demonstrated 45 malignant tumors, 5 benign diseases, 3 suspicious cancers, 1 negative and 2 unsatisfied samples. In 7 lung cancer patients staged by EBUS-TBNA, 5 showed metastasis and 2 showed no metastasis. In 21 cases with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy, EBUS-TBNA demonstrated 3 malignant tumors, 13 benign diseases, 2 negative and 3 unsatisfied samples. All 5 mediastinal lesions were malignant. Three suspicious cancers were confirmed, 1 by CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy and 2 by clinical follow-ups. In 2 lung cancer patients EBUS-TBNA showed negative, 1 surgical sample showed metastasis and another no metastasis by PET-CT. Three negative cases were diagnosed as benign by clinical follow-ups. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA were 95%, 100%, 100% and 20% respectively. CONCLUSION: EBUS-TBNA is both effective and safe in making a diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions.

[Diagnostic value of transbronchial needle aspiration combined with transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in mediastinal and pulmonary hilar lesions].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) combined with transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of mediastinal and pulmonary hilar lesions as well as in the lymph node staging (N staging) of lung cancer. METHODS: 129 patients with mediastinal and pulmonary hilar lesions underwent either TBNA or EUS-FNA with cytological needle aspiration. The samples obtained from TBNA or EUS-FNA were examined by both cytologiy and histopathology. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients, 59 underwent TBNA and 70 EUS-FNA. The diagnostic rate were 84.7% (50/59) by TBNA and 94.3% (66/70) by EUS-FNA, resepectively. The diagnosis of 116 (89.9%) patients were confirmed by either TBNA or EUS-FNA. The pathological and cytological diagnostic rates were 92.2% (107/116) and 88.0% (102/116), resepectively. The diagnostic rate was elevated by 8.4% (9/107) through pathological examination. The histological classification rates by cytological and pathological examination were 73.8% (76/116) and 89.3% (92/103), respectively. The diagnostic rate of histological classification was elevated by 35.5% (27/76) through pathological examination. CONCLUSION: The combination of TBNA and EUS-FNA can improve the diagnostic rate for wider mediastinal and pulmlonary hilar lesions. Pathological examination of the samples obtained from the TBNA and EUS-FNA can elevate not only the rate of diagnosis but also the rate of histological classification.