Sex differences in the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with newer generation devices: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a reasonable therapeutic approach among patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis irrespective of surgical risk. Data regarding sex-specific differences in the outcomes with newer generation valves are limited. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing sex differences in the outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR with newer generation valves (SAPIEN 3 or Evolut). Random effects model was constructed for summary estimates. RESULTS: Four observational studies with 4522 patients (44.8% women) were included in the meta-analysis. Women were older and had a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease and mean EuroScore. Women had a higher incidence of short-term mortality (up to 30 days) (risk ratio [RR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.25), but no difference in 1-year mortality (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72-1.17). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.86-1.57), permanent pacemaker (PPM) (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62-1.04), or disabling stroke (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.54-2.45). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, we found that women undergoing TAVR with newer-generation devices were older but had a lower prevalence of comorbidities. Women had a higher incidence of short-term mortality but no difference in the 1-year mortality, bleeding, PPM, or stroke compared with men. Future studies are required to confirm these findings.

Cardiogenic shock in a young woman with SCAD: The importance of early access to VA-ECMO in the community.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a common cause of myocardial infarction in young and middle-aged women. Patients with SCAD present rarely with hemodynamic collapse and cardiogenic shock, requiring immediate resuscitation and mechanical circulatory support. Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support may serve as a bridge to recovery, decision or heart transplantation. We present a case of a young woman with SCAD of the left main coronary artery, presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. She was stabilized emergently with Impella and early escalation with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECPELLA) at a non-surgical community hospital. Despite revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), her left ventricular recovery was poor, and ultimately required cardiac transplantation on day 5 of her presentation.

Coronary steal syndrome caused by a large saphenous venous graft aneurysm with a fistula communicating to the right atrium managed by transcatheter closure.

A 71-year-old man with history of coronary artery disease status post coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 1999 (left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending, saphenous venous graft [SVG]-diagonal, and SVG-right coronary artery [RCA], ascending aorta aneurysm [4.8 cm], infrarenal aorta aortic aneurysm status post endovascular aortic repair, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction of 25% status post cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator) presented with decompensated heart failure. He was in monomorphic ventricular tachycardia; he was cardioverted and started on amiodarone and lidocaine. His vital signs remained stable.

Antithrombotic Management for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: There have been significant changes in the optimal antithrombotic regimen post transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) after the results of major clinical trials in the past few years. Given the clinical importance of the optimal antithrombotic therapy post TAVI, we performed a narrative description of the major clinical trials behind the scientific evidence supporting these changes, as well the current guideline recommendations and knowledge gaps. METHODS: We performed a narrative description of the major clinical trials behind the scientific evidence supporting these changes. We used PubMed as a major source to collect the major clinical trials including the following key words: "transcatheter aortic valve replacement", "transcatheter aortic valve implantation", "antithrombotic", "antiplatelet" and "anticoagulation". We selected the major clinical trials on this topic. This is not a systematic review or meta-analysis. RESULTS: We describe the results of the major clinical trials on antithrombotic therapy post TAVI: POPULAR-TAVI A, POPULAR-TAVI B, ENVISAGE-TAVI AF, GALILEO, ATLANTIS and ADAPT-TAVR trials. Based on the results of these trials, single antiplatelet therapy is recommended post TAVI in patients without concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy, especially in elderly patients. In younger patients, it is advised to evaluate the patient's bleeding and thrombotic risk, and dual antiplatelet therapy may be reasonable in patients with a high thrombotic risk and low bleeding risk. In patients with a concurrent indication for oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy, it is recommended to continue oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy post TAVI. CONCLUSION: In most patients without concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation, single antiplatelet therapy is recommended post TAVI.

Thrombectomy using AlphaVac for left atrial thrombus causing mechanical mitral valve obstruction and cardiogenic shock.

We present a 73-year-old female with history of rheumatic heart disease status post-mechanical mitral valve on warfarin, valvular atrial fibrillation, and alpha thalassemia who was admitted to an outside hospital with anterior ST-segment myocardial infarction. Coronary angiogram showed occluded left anterior descending artery (LAD) with acute thrombus status post-thrombectomy and balloon angioplasty.

Treatment of left main coronary artery compression in the setting of unpalliated congenital heart disease: a case series.

Background: Left main coronary artery compression syndrome (LMCS) is a well-characterized phenomenon resulting from compression of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) between the aorta and an enlarged pulmonary arterial trunk. The development of LMCS is usually described in the context of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cases of LMCS, in the context of unpalliated congenital heart disease (CHD), are complex clinical scenarios that challenge traditional treatment paradigms. Case summary: Here, we discuss two thought-provoking patients with unpalliated CHD complicated by severe pulmonary hypertension (PH). Both patients developed LMCS, one with severe non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and the other with refractory angina. Their pulmonary vascular resistance was severely elevated despite pulmonary vasodilator therapy, and concomitant surgical correction of their CHD in addition to bypass grafting was deemed high risk. They underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the LMCA with drug-eluting stents. Discussion: Pulmonary hypertension can develop in the setting of long-standing unpalliated CHD. Surgical correction of congenital heart defects may be performed in select patients with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts, contingent on the status of PH severity. Pulmonary vasodilator therapy modulates haemodynamics to ensure surgical correction without risk of cardiopulmonary demise-termed the 'treat and repair' strategy. LMCS, an increasingly recognized phenomenon in patients with long-standing PH, is a notable complicating factor in the 'treat and repair' strategy. We introduce the concept that PCI of the LMCA may bridge patients to corrective surgery for CHD by allowing time for optimization of their pulmonary vasodilator therapy.

Intracoronary Imaging and Physiology to Guide PCI: Are We Ready for a Class I Guideline Recommendation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the last decade, there has been a plethora of evidence to support the utilization of intravascular coronary imaging and physiological assessment to guide percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). While there is a class I recommendation for the use of coronary physiology to guide PCI, the use of intravascular coronary imaging remains a class IIa recommendation. Herein, we aimed to review the recent scientific evidence from major trials highlighting the consideration for a future class I guideline recommendation for the use of intracoronary imaging. RECENT FINDINGS: The benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to guide and optimize PCI have been demonstrated in several large trials. These trials have demonstrated that IVUS reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. Similarly, intracoronary physiology has been demonstrated to be an important tool to guide revascularization decision-making and been associated with a lower incidence of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization compared with angiography alone. With existing clinical outcomes data on the benefit of intracoronary physiology and imaging-guided PCI as well as forthcoming data from ongoing trials regarding the use of these modalities, the interventional cardiology community is bound to transition from routine PCI to precision-, image-, and physiology-guided PCI.

A Visual Depiction of Left Ventricular Unloading in Veno-Arterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Impella.

Left ventricular (LV) unloading has been associated with improved survival in patients treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This case describes a patient with a COVID-19 infection who subsequently developed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with an LV ejection fraction of 10% to 15% (baseline echocardiography). He did poorly in the outpatient setting and was admitted to an outside hospital with heart failure symptoms and was subsequently transferred to our hospital for escalation of care and consideration of advanced heart failure therapies. This clinical image and related video series help to visually demonstrate the effect of LV unloading in a 30-year-old male with a history of COVID-19 myocarditis.

Non-obstructive Plaque and Treatment of INOCA: More to Be Learned.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A significant proportion of patients evaluated for chest pain have ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Studies have shown INOCA is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events and significant burden on the health care system. RECENT FINDINGS: While there is scarce scientific evidence on management of INOCA, the CorMicA trial showed that stratified medical therapy based on the type of INOCA improved patients' symptoms and quality of life. There are multiple ongoing trials, including Women's IschemiA Trial to Reduce Events in Non-ObstRuctIve CORonary Artery Disease (WARRIOR trial), assessing the benefit of intensive medical therapy versus usual care for this increasingly recognized clinical entity. In this review, we discuss the definition of INOCA, epidemiology and risk factors, pathophysiology, and management as well as the current knowledge gaps and ongoing clinical trials in this arena.

Impact of COVID-19 on Management Strategies for Coronary and Structural Heart Disease Interventions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges globally, with significant strain on the healthcare system in the United States and worldwide. In this article, we review the impact of COVID-19 on percutaneous coronary interventions and structural heart disease practices, as well as the impact of the pandemic on related clinical research and trials. We also discuss the consensus recommendations from the scientific societies and suggest potential solutions and strategies to overcome some of these challenges. FINDINGS: With the limited resources and significant burden on the healthcare system during the pandemic, changes have evolved in practice to provide care to the highest risk patients while minimizing unnecessary exposure during elective surgical or transcatheter procedures. The COVID-19 crisis has significantly impacted the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes, chronic coronary syndromes, and structural heart disease.

Sex differences in outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with MitraClip: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip improves outcomes among select patients with moderate-to-severe and severe mitral regurgitation; however, data regarding sex-specific differences in the outcomes among patients undergoing TEER are limited. METHODS: An electronic search of the PubMed, Embase, Central, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing sex differences in outcomes among patients undergoing TEER was performed. Summary estimates were primarily conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 24,905 patients (45.6% women) were included. Women were older and had a lower prevalence of comorbidities, including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease. There was no difference in procedural success (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.05) and short-term mortality (i.e., up to 30 days) between women and men (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.97-1.39). Women had a higher incidence of periprocedural bleeding and stroke (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15-1.56) and (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.10-2.25), respectively. At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was no difference in mortality (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.89-1.09) and heart failure hospitalizations (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.68-1.67). An analysis of adjusted long-term mortality showed a lower incidence of mortality among women (hazards ratio: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lower prevalence of baseline comorbidities, women undergoing TEER with MitraClip had higher unadjusted rates of periprocedural stroke and bleeding as compared with men. There was no difference in unadjusted procedural success, short-term or long-term mortality. However, women had lower adjusted mortality on long-term follow-up. Future high-quality studies assessing sex differences in outcomes after TEER are needed to confirm these findings.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Current Gaps and Future Directions.

There has been increasing interest in open artery syndrome, also known as ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). INOCA has been increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous clinical entity. Diagnostic evaluation of this heterogeneous entity, including invasive assessment, remains key to diagnose this clinical condition and provide the appropriate treatment. Importantly, medical stratification based on the type of INOCA has shown benefit in improving the symptoms in these patients, as illustrated in the CorMicA trial. The Women's IschemiA Trial to Reduce Events in Non-ObstRuctIve CORonary Artery Disease (WARRIOR) is another promising landmark trial that is currently enrolling patients and will address some of the unanswered questions for management of women with INOCA. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, management options, knowledge gaps, and future directions while highlighting the rationale and design of the ongoing WARRIOR trial.

Utility of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting ischaemic stroke in patients with or without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Anticoagulants are the mainstay treatment for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and the CHA2DS2-VASc score is widely used to guide anticoagulation therapy in this cohort. However, utility of CHA2DS2-VASc in NVAF patients is debated, primarily because it is a vascular scoring system, which does not incorporate atrial fibrillation related parameters. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the discrimination ability of CHA2DS2-VASc in predicting ischaemic stroke overall, and in subgroups of patients with or without NVAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched till June 2020 for published articles that assessed the discrimination ability of CHA2DS2-VASc, as measured by C-statistics, during mid-term (2-5 years) and long-term (>5 years) follow-up. Summary estimates were reported as random effects C-statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seventeen articles were included in the analysis. Nine studies (n = 453 747 patients) reported the discrimination ability of CHA2DS2-VASc in NVAF patients, and 10 studies (n = 138 262 patients) in patients without NVAF. During mid-term follow-up, CHA2DS2-VASc predicted stroke with modest discrimination in the overall cohort [0.67 (0.65-0.69)], with similar discrimination ability in patients with NVAF [0.65 (0.63-0.68)] and in those without NVAF [0.69 (0.68-0.71)] (P-interaction = 0.08). Similarly, at long-term follow-up, CHA2DS2-VASc had modest discrimination [0.66 (0.63-0.69)], which was consistent among patients with NVAF [0.63 (0.54-0.71)] and those without NVAF [0.67 (0.64-0.70)] (P-interaction = 0.39). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the discrimination power of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting ischaemic stroke is modest, and is similar in the presence or absence of NVAF. More accurate stroke prediction models are thus needed for the NVAF population.