Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Sports Med ; 51(14): 3802-3809, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37975517

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) has been found to be a valid tool, and PSQ scores have been shown to be predictive of outcomes after surgery for lumbar stenosis. The effect of pain sensitivity on outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery has not been examined. HYPOTHESIS: PSQ scores would be associated with surgical outcomes after arthroscopic RCR surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients 18 to 80 years old scheduled for RCR were consecutively enrolled. Patients with glenohumeral arthritis grade ≥2 or RCR revision surgery were excluded. PSQ was completed preoperatively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used as patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), and visual analog scale pain score was documented as well. Active shoulder external rotation (ER), internal rotation, and anterior forward elevation range of motion (ROM) were recorded. PROMs and ROM measurements were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Rotator cuff tear size, type of repair, and concomitant procedures were documented. Patients were classified as having high or normal pain sensitivity based on PSQ scores. RESULTS: Of 100 enrolled patients, 38 patients were classified as having high pain sensitivity. Patients with high pain sensitivity had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). From the preoperative assessment to 3 months postoperatively, PROMs improved more in patients with high versus normal pain sensitivity. However, for patients with high pain sensitivity, PROMs plateaued after 3 months but continued to improve for patients with normal pain sensitivity (P < .01). Visual analog scale pain scores were higher at all time points for patients with high pain sensitivity (P < .05). Preoperatively, patients with high pain sensitivity had restricted active ROM compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity for anterior forward elevation, ER, and internal rotation (P = .009, P = .012, and P = .006, respectively). By 1 year after surgery, ER ROM was still restricted in patients with high pain sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Pain sensitivity is an important factor influencing RCR outcomes. Patients with high pain sensitivity undergoing RCR showed less improvement in active ROM and worse PROMs after surgery compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity. Preoperative PSQ may predict postoperative improvements.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries , Rotator Cuff , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Rotator Cuff/surgery , Cohort Studies , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Arthroscopy/methods , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Rotator Cuff Injuries/complications , Pain , Range of Motion, Articular , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 44(2): 204-211, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31050608

ABSTRACT

Context: There is no consensus on the preferred treatment for patients with spinal metastases. Little is known about the outcomes of surgery for this population. The objectives of this paper are to examine the outcomes of surgery among patients with spinal metastases suffering from cord compression (CC) or intractable pain (IP).Design: Retrospective, descriptive (level 4) case series.Setting: Rabin Medical Center, Israel.Participants: 61 patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis in a tertiary care hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: those with spinal CC and those with IP only.Interventions: Surgery due to CC or IP among patients with spinal metastases.Outcome measures: Frankel scale to assess neurological status, ambulatory and incontinence status, which were examined before surgery, at discharge and at last follow-up. Endpoints were death or latest follow-up visit. Survival and postoperative complications were documented.Results: There was no significant difference in Frankel score before and after surgery among patients with CC (mean score 3.5 and 3.4 respectively, P = 0.62). Complete incontinence rates significantly increased in patients with CC between preoperative and last follow-up examinations (13.6% vs. 20%, respectively, P = 0.05). Median survival of CC and IP groups was 201 and 402 days, respectively (P = 0.32). Complication rate was 41.4%.Conclusion: In our cohort, Frankel score and walking capability of patients with CC did not change postoperatively, but continence status deteriorated over time. Surgeons should advise patients on expected surgical outcomes, especially in non-ambulatory and incontinent patients.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Compression , Spinal Cord Injuries , Spinal Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Cord Compression/surgery , Spinal Neoplasms/complications , Spinal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Walking
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...