ABSTRACT
The principles of treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH) in an older child are different from those in a newborn. In the older child retraction of the muscles around the hip, associated with a marked acetabular dysplasia and elongation of the joint capsule explain the difficulty and instability of reduction and the frequency of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of age on the results of a one-stage open reduction in developmental dislocation of the hip. We present the results of 21 children (27 hips) with a mean age of 6 years and 10 months at time of operation, consisting of one- stage open reduction, femoral shortening and Salter or triple pelvic osteotomy. Two groups were formed : one older and one younger than 8 years of age. We evaluated the patients according to the Severin and Mc Kay classifications. After an average follow-up of 49 months (24-84 months) 74% of patients showed a very good or good result according to Severin's radiological classification and 63% according to Mc Kay's clinical classification. When analyzed with regard to age, we found important differences in the clinical and radiological results between the children younger and older than 8 years.
Subject(s)
Hip Dislocation, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Hip Dislocation, Congenital/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Acetabulum/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Femur/surgery , Femur Head/surgery , Humans , Male , Osteotomy/methods , Radiography , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In order to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability of an evaluation system of the International Clubfoot Study Group, 30 children treated for unilateral clubfoot and their radiographs were examined by three different observers. The mean intraobserver kappa value was found to be 0.62. The mean interobserver kappa value was 0.73. These kappa values correlated with a substantial degree of agreement. Interobserver reliability for all subgroup evaluations (morphologic, functional and radiological) and total scores was 90% or over. This also indicates a good interobserver reliability. In conclusion, the Bensahel et al. and International Clubfoot Study Group outcome evaluation system may be used reliably for the assessment of outcome of the treatment of clubfoot.
