Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Malar J ; 14: 449, 2015 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26573814

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Artesunate + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) has been the first-line treatment and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) the second-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Yemen since 2005. This paper reports the results of studies conducted to monitor therapeutic efficacy of these two drugs in sentinel sites in Yemen. METHODS: Eight therapeutic efficacy studies were conducted in six sentinel sites during the period 2009-2013 in Yemen. Five studies were for the evaluation of AS + SP (total of 465 patients) and three studies (total of 268 patients) for the evaluation of AL. The studies were done according to standard WHO protocol 2009 with 28-day follow-up. RESULTS: In the evaluation of AS + SP, the PCR-corrected cure rate was 98 % (95 % CI 92.2-99.5 %) in one site and 100 % in all of the other four sites. In the sites where AL was evaluated, the PCR-corrected cure rate was 100 % in all the sites. All patients were negative for asexual parasitaemia on day 3 in both the AS + SP and the AL groups. There was a higher rate of clearance of gametocytaemia in the AL-treated group when compared with the AS + SP groups from day 7 onwards. CONCLUSION: AS + SP remains the effective drug for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Yemen. AL is also highly effective and can be an appropriate alternative to AS + SP for the treatment of falciparum malaria. AL demonstrated a higher efficacy in clearing microscopic gametocytaemia than AS + SP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number ACTRN12610000696099.


Subject(s)
Artemisinins/administration & dosage , Ethanolamines/administration & dosage , Fluorenes/administration & dosage , Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy , Pyrimethamine/administration & dosage , Sulfadoxine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Combinations , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Yemen , Young Adult
2.
Crit Care Med ; 28(3): 749-54, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10752825

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Using a standardized massive splenic injury model of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock, we studied the effect of vigorous fluid resuscitation on the hemodynamic response and survival time in rats. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. Duration of follow-up was 4 hrs. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 240-430 g. INTERVENTIONS: Standardized massive splenic injury was induced by two transverse incisions in the rat's spleen. The animals were randomized into four groups: group 1 (n = 8) underwent sham operation; in group 2 (n = 15), massive splenic injury was untreated; in group 3 (n = 15), massive splenic injury was treated with 41.5 mL/kg 0.9% sodium chloride (large-volume normal saline); and in group 4 (n = 15), massive splenic injury was treated with 5 mL/kg 7.5% sodium chloride (hypertonic saline). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The hemodynamic and metabolic variables in the sham-operated group 1 were stable throughout the experiment. Mean arterial pressure in group 2 decreased from 86.5 +/- 4.0 to 50.3 +/- 6.3 mm Hg (p < .001) in the first 15 mins after massive splenic injury. Mean survival time in group 2 was 127.5 +/- 17.0 mins; total blood loss was 33.8% +/-2.6% of blood volume; and the mortality rate at 1 hr was 13.3%. Bolus infusion of large-volume normal saline after 15 mins resulted in an early increase in mean arterial pressure from 48.6 +/-7.4 to 83.3 +/- 7.2 mm Hg (p < .01); it then rapidly decreased to 24.6 +/- 8.6 mm Hg (p < .001) after 60 mins. The mean survival time (95.3 +/- 16.4 mins) was significantly lower than in group 2 (p < .01); total blood loss (48.0% +/- 4.3%) was significantly higher than in group 2 (p < .01); and mortality rate in the first hour was 33.3% (p < .05). Bolus infusion of hypertonic saline also decreased survival time to 93.3 +/- 20.3 mins (p < .01), but total blood loss was 35.2% +/- 3.0%, which was not significantly different from the blood loss in group 2. The mortality rate in the first hour (60.0%) was significantly higher than in group 2 (p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Vigorous infusion of normal saline after massive splenic injury resulted in a significant increase in intra-abdominal bleeding and decreased survival time. The hemodynamic response to crystalloid infusion in blunt abdominal trauma is primarily dependent on the severity of injury and the rate of blood loss.


Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy , Resuscitation/methods , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Spleen/injuries , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Shock, Hemorrhagic/etiology , Survival Analysis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL