Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32670196

ABSTRACT

Background: Older people with diabetes have an increased risk for disability and cognitive dysfunction, which may impede self-care capacity. These are not evaluated routinely in current health systems. In the Center for Successful Aging with Diabetes, patients over the age of 60 undergo multi-disciplinary evaluation days and are provided with an integrated (cognitive, physical, nutritional, and medical) treatment plan. Among individuals with below-normal cognitive function, self-adherence to these recommendations poses a challenge. Thus, the aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a multidisciplinary intervention amongst older people with diabetes with below-normal cognitive function and sub-optimal glucose control. Methods: Patients with a MoCA score under 26 and A1C >= 7.5% participated in a two-arm intervention: (A) a medical intervention: monthly meetings with a diabetes nurse-educator, supervised by a diabetes specialist and study psychologist during which changes in their pharmacological regimen of glucose, blood pressure, and lipid control were made and (B) a cognitive/physical rehabilitation intervention. This arm consisted of (1) an intensive phase-group meetings which included computerized cognitive training, aerobic, balance, and strength exercise, and group discussions and (2) a monthly consolidation phase. Outcomes included change in A1C, change in strength, balance, and aerobic exercise capacity as well as change in quality of life. Results: After 12 months there was a 0.7% reduction in A1C. After 3 months there was a statistically significant improvement in physical indices, including aerobic capacity (6-min walk), balance (FSST) and indices assessing the risk of fall (10-meter walk, time up and go). There was no additional improvement in physical indices between the 3 and 12 month visits. For some of the physical measures, the improvement observed after 3 months persisted partially to the 12-month visit. Conclusions: This feasibility study provides preliminary data that support the efficacy of the complex interventions described. The findings suggest that this older population would require an ongoing "intensive phase" intervention. Larger prospective randomized trials are needed.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Aging/pathology , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Exercise , Quality of Life , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/pathology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Male , Prognosis
2.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 34(7): e3030, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29896891

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Successful ageing with diabetes is challenged by co-morbidities, which may present barriers to self-care. Currently, measurement of physical and cognitive status is not part of routine care of the older person with diabetes, and these are not taken into account when devising the treatment plan. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel approach that integrates cognitive and physical assessment into the routine evaluation of the older person with diabetes and the tailor-made treatment plan devised accordingly. To provide estimates of the relative contribution of cognitive and physical disabilities in this population. METHODS: Cognitive and physical assessments were added to the standard evaluation. A composite measure of cognitive and of physical status categorizing each individual to intact, mild, or severe impairment was generated. In addition, all recommendations provided were categorized and tabulated. RESULTS: Of 119 individuals, over the age of 60 with type 2 diabetes who were referred because of difficulties in managing their disease, 16% and 3% of individuals met the criteria for severe cognitive/physical impairment, respectively, and 42% and 21% met the criteria for mild cognitive/physical impairment; 72%, 12.5%, 61% received recommendations related to intensification of physical activity, cognitive treatment, change in pharmacological agents, respectively. 25% were referred for further emotional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a substantial proportion of individuals with diabetes over the age of 60 may have cognitive/physical impairment. It highlights the importance of measuring these as part of the multidisciplinary evaluation and being able to provide a tailor made treatment plan.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Physical Examination/methods , Physical Fitness/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition Disorders/complications , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mobility Limitation , Pilot Projects , Psychomotor Disorders/complications , Psychomotor Disorders/diagnosis , Self Care/psychology , Self Care/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...