ABSTRACT
Background: Mycobacterium bovis is a zoonotic member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex with a wide range of hosts, mainly cattle. Molecular epidemiological studies should be conducted to determine the transmission route, zoonotic risk factors, and phylogenetic relationships of M. bovis strains. Aims: This study aimed to characterize bovine and human M. bovis isolates by molecular methods. Methods: Molecular characterization and clonal relationship of strains isolated from tissue and organ samples of 76 cattle with positive tuberculin tests were collected from a slaughterhouse, and four M. bovis strains isolated from clinical materials of patients with suspected pulmonary TB isolates were analyzed using 24-locus MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping methods. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus; Qiagen) was used to determine the prevalence of latent TB infection among 21 slaughterhouse personnel including 7 veterinarians, 12 butchers, 1 caretaker, and 1 veterinary technician. Results: SB0288/SIT685 type was detected in both cattle and humans by the spoligotyping method. When evaluating MIRU-VNTR, the presence of a 100% compatible pattern between human and bovine isolates was not detected, but some human samples were found to be 91.6% similar to a bovine sample. In addition, 21 slaughterhouse workers were screened with the interferon gamma-released assay (IGRA) and a 23.8% positivity was detected. Conclusion: Clonal similarity was determined between the bovine and human isolates using the MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping methods and IGRA positivity in the occupational group suggested that M. bovis might be associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in humans.
ABSTRACT
Background: In this study, it was aimed to investigate Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated from lungs and lymph nodes of slaughtered animals on clonal level by using different methods such as spoligotyping, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR), randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPD-PCR) and OUT-PCR. Comparative evaluation of these methods was further conducted. Methods: A total of 38 M. bovis isolates were evaluated in the study. DNA isolation of all M. bovis strains isolated from pruvat free Löwenstein Jensen medium was done by boiling method for ERIC-PCR, RAPD-PCR, and OUT PCR. Mickle device was used for DNA isolation for spoligotyping method. Results: In 38 M. bovis isolates examined in our study, 4 different groups were determined by spoligotyping and RAPD-PCR test methods, and 5 different groups were detected in ERIC-PCR tests. In the OUT-PCR tests, the band which provides sufficient type separation was not observed. Conclusion: ERIC-PCR, RAPD-PCR, and OUT-PCR methods are easily applicable, simple, and relatively inexpensive methods for evaluating the differences between origins in the typing of M. bovis. The tests need to be evaluated in more detail with extensive studies.