Novel approaches toward early diagnosis of islet allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: The inability to diagnose early rejection of an islet allograft has previously proved to be a major impediment to progress in clinical islet transplantation. The need to detect early rejection will become even more relevant as new tolerance-inducing protocols are evaluated in the clinic. We explored three novel approaches toward development of early diagnostic markers of islet rejection after islet allotransplantation. METHODS: (a) Canine islet allograft transplant recipients were immunosuppressed for 1 month, then therapy was withdrawn. Serum glutamic acid decarboxylase antigen (GAD65), an endogenous islet protein, was monitored daily with a CO2 release assay. (b) Rodent islets were genetically engineered to express a unique foreign protein (beta-galactosidase) by using adenoviral vectors, and after allograft transplantation, the viral-specific protein was measured in serum using optical luminescence. (c) Rodents receiving islet allografts were immunosuppressed temporarily, and daily glucose tolerance tests were followed until graft failure occurred. RESULTS: (a) Although serum monitoring of GAD65 antigen demonstrated elevated levels preceding loss of graft function in preliminary studies, the effect was not reproducible in all animals. (b) Genetically engineered rodent islets demonstrated normal insulin kinetics in vitro (insulin stimulation index 2.57+/-0.2 vs. 2.95+/-0.3 for control islets, P=ns), and purified viral protein products had a stable half-life of 8 hr in vivo. After islet allotransplantation, there were two peak elevations in serum viral proteins, confirming that an intra-islet "sentinel signal" could be detected serologically during acute rejection. There was no lead-time ahead of hyperglycemia, however. (c) Daily sequential intravenous glucose tolerance (IVGT) tests demonstrated evidence of allograft dysfunction (decline in KG) with a 2-day lead time to hyperglycemia (2.58+/-0.3 vs. 1.63+/-0.2%/min, respectively, P<0.001), with an accuracy of 89%, sensitivity of 78%, and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Of the three diagnostic tests, metabolic assessment with an abbreviated IVGT was the most effective method of demonstrating early islet dysfunction due to rejection.

Prolongation of canine pancreatic islet allograft survival with combined rapamycin and cyclosporine therapy at low doses. Rapamycin efficacy is blood level related.

We studied the survival of 5 groups of apancreatic mongrel dogs that received 30 days of treatment with CsA adjusted to 300 micrograms/L, rapamycin (0.05 mg/kg/day), both, or no immunosuppression after intrasplenic allotransplantation with purified pancreatic islets. Autografts survived indefinitely. Neither CsA nor rapamycin alone at low doses showed significant increase in islet allograft survival: 6.2 +/- 1.7 and 5.0 +/- 1.1, respectively, versus 3.4 +/- 1.0 days in controls. Dogs treated with low doses of both CsA and rapamycin demonstrated prolongation of graft function to 23.6 +/- 13.2 days (P < 0.05). These findings support synergism between these 2 agents, especially as CsA was not shown to increase trough rapamycin blood concentration when given together. In the combined treatment group, a significant (r = 0.90, P < 0.001) relationship was found between rapamycin blood levels and graft survival. Animals having trough rapamycin concentrations > 10 micrograms/L had significantly (P < 0.05) prolonged graft survival, which suggests that dosing of rapamycin according to blood levels may optimize the effectiveness of the drug. Given at these low doses, combination CsA and rapamycin gave no evidence of adverse effects as measured by hepatic and renal function tests, histology, or electron microscopy.