Comparison of the Efficiency of Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation Methods in the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of two thermal ablation techniques (radiofrequency vs microwave ablation) in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with 80 nodules underwent thermal ablation of thyroid nodules with either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (23 females and 14 males; mean age 41 ± 9years) or microwave ablation (MWA) (28 females and 15 males; mean age 45 ± 11years). Ultrasound assessments were made at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after the ablation procedure. RESULTS: The mean initial volume of the nodules (RFA: 15.6 mL [min 2.5-max 74]; MWA: 40 mL [min 2-max 205]) was statistically significantly different (P < .001). The following were the volume reduction rates of nodules at 1, 3, 6, and 12months, respectively: after RFA: 46.8 ± 13.5%, 62.9 ± 13.6%, 71.6 ± 11.9%, and 77.9 ± 10.3%. After MWA: 38.7 ± 12.5%, 54 ± 15.3%, 59.6 ± 12.5%, and 65 ± 11.3%. For all months, volume reduction rates in the RFA group were significantly higher than those in the MWA group (P < .05). One patient treated by RFA reported an abscess formation and another patient treated by RFA had a self-limiting hematoma, who recovered without any further treatment. Also, in the MWA group, one patient had abscess formation and another patient had transient recurrent nerve paralysis, who recovered with appropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: Both methods are effective in treating benign thyroid nodules; however, RFA provides a better volume reduction.

46 XX male syndrome with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: A case report.

We report a 46 XX male syndrome diagnosed after failure of gonadotropin therapy taken for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to a pituitary macroadenoma. A 39-year-old man with a non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma was admitted to our clinic due to vision loss and infertility. After pituitary surgery, vision loss improved while infertility still existed. Low testosterone levels without elevated gonadotropins were established suggesting hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to pituitary adenoma. Gonadotropin treatment was initiated. There was no response to treatment after 12 months. A karyotype analysis was ordered to investigate other causes of infertility. Karyotype analysis showed a 46 XX male syndrome that can explain the failure of gonadotropin therapy. Testosterone therapy was started instead of gonadotropin therapy. 46 XX male syndrome usually presents with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. However, in our case, it presented with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to pituitary mass not responding to gonadotropin therapy. It is important to keep in mind to obtain a genetic analysis of patients whose gonadotropin therapy failed, even if their gonadotropin levels are not elevated.