ABSTRACT
AIMS: We aimed to provide contemporary real-world data on wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) use, not only in terms of effectiveness and safety but also compliance and acceptability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Across 88 French centres, the WEARIT-France study enrolled retrospectively patients who used the WCD between May 2014 and December 2016, and prospectively all patients equipped for WCD therapy between January 2017 and March 2018. All patients received systematic education session through a standardized programme across France at the time of initiation of WCD therapy and were systematically enrolled in the LifeVest Network remote services. Overall, 1157 patients were included (mean age 60 ± 12 years, 16% women; 46% prospectively): 82.1% with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 10.3% after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator explant, and 7.6% before heart transplantation. Median WCD usage period was 62 (37-97) days. Median daily wear time of WCD was 23.4 (22.2-23.8) h. In multivariate analysis, younger age was associated with lower compliance [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-0.99, P < 0.01]. A total of 18 participants (1.6%) received at least one appropriate shock, giving an incidence of appropriate therapy of 7.2 per 100 patient-years. Patient-response button allowed the shock to be aborted in 35.7% of well-tolerated sustained ventricular arrhythmias and in 95.4% of inappropriate ventricular arrhythmia detection, finally resulting in an inappropriate therapy in eight patients (0.7%). CONCLUSION: Our real-life findings reinforce previous studies on the efficacy and safety of the WCD in the setting of transient high-risk group in selected patients. Moreover, they emphasize the fact that when prescribed appropriately, in concert with adequate patient education and dedicated follow-up using specific remote monitoring system, compliance with WCD is high and the device well-tolerated by the patient.
Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Wearable Electronic Devices , Aged , Cohort Studies , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Defibrillators , Electric Countershock , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue. This study conducted a real-life analysis of the impact of clinical characteristics and medical management of HF on its prognosis. METHODS: Analysis was based on the EGB ("Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires") database. A cohort comprising 1825 adult patients with a first admission for HF between 2009 and 2011 was created and followed until June 2013 (median 22.3 [7.7-34.5] months) for survival analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 77.3 ± 13.2 years (53 % ≥80 years). The overall incidence of HF admission was 117 [112-122] per 100,000 population with a marked increase in patients >80 years (1297 [1217-1348]). At discharge, only 8 % of patients received recommended combination of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB), beta-blockers (BB) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Only prescription levels of BB and vitamin K antagonists, at discharge, increased during the study period. In-hospital mortality was 9 % and survival was 71.6 %[69.5-73.6] and 52.0 %[49.4-54.6] at 12 and 36 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, female gender [HR:0.78 (0.67-0.91), p = 0.001], ACEi/ARB + BB + MRA [0.41 (0.28-0.60), p < 0.001] and ACEi/ARB + BB [0.47 (0.39-0.57) p < 0.001] treatments were associated with improved survival, conversely to age 70-79 [1.90 (1.20-3.00), p = 0.003] and ≥80 [3.50 (2.30-5.40), p < 0.001], cardiogenic shock [3.00 (2.10-4.40), p < 0.001], acute pulmonary edema [1.70 (1.10-2.50), p = 0.01], denutrition [1.80 (1.45-2.24), p < 0.001], dilated cardiomyopathy [1.20 (1.00-1.40), p = 0.02] and in-hospital acute renal failure [1.36 (1.05-1.78), p = 0.002]. CONCLUSIONS: These real-life HF data provide insight into prognostic factors and "real-world" pharmacological management in this unselected HF population, confirming the benefit of ACEi/ARB + BB ± MRAs on patient survival.
