Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 34(5): 1305-1309, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36950851

ABSTRACT

Head and neck tumors can rarely cause carotid sinus syndrome and this often resolves by surgical intervention or palliative chemoradiotherapy. If these modalities are not an option or are ineffective, the most preferred treatment is permanent pacemaker therapy. Here, we present the first case of cardioneuroablation treatment performed in patient with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer who developed recurrent asystole and syncope attacks due to compression of the carotid sinus on neck movement.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell , Pacemaker, Artificial , Humans , Carotid Sinus , Syncope/diagnosis , Syncope/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/complications , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/therapy
2.
J Vasc Access ; 23(3): 416-421, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33624532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative ultrasound (US) for cephalic cut-down is related to shorter procedure time and higher success rate. This study aimed to assess efficiency of US-guided percutaneous cephalic vein (CV) puncture for placement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: Patients undergoing a procedure including both US-guided pectoral nerve block (PECS) and percutaneous CV puncture were retrospectively investigated. Patient medical history and demographic data was collected. Clinical features of the procedures and intra- and post-operative complications occurring were collected from patient records. Clinical data included target vessel features, and the time taken for the following: CV puncture; CV and PECS puncture; total procedure. RESULTS: In total 34 patients had CV puncture with US-guided PECS block was attempted in all patients and the procedure was successful in 27 of 34 (79.4%) patients. The total number of CV puncture attempts was 62 for 34 leads (mean attempts per lead = 1.82). The mean ± standard deviation time for CV puncture was 137.5 ± 27.4 s. There were no venous access-related complications. CONCLUSION: US-guided CV puncture appears feasible and safe with an acceptable success rate. In case of failure of the US-guided axillary or subclavian vein approach, it may be preferred as an alternative to the cephalic cut-down procedure, where the success rate is relatively lower and the risk of bleeding is higher.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous , Phlebotomy , Electronics , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects
4.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 42(7): 1026-1031, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Combined ultrasound (US)-guided pectoral nerves (PECS) block and axillary vein (AV) puncture for cardiac implantable electronic devices can be effective to achieve optimal perioperative pain management and prevent access-related complications. METHODS: A total of 36 patients who underwent combined US-guided PECS block and AV puncture were included. All routinely recorded parameters, including clinical and demographic characteristics, periprocedural medical administrations, the time taken for both PECS block and AV puncture, procedure time, postprocedural pain score, and procedure-related complications, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 54 leads were placed in 36 patients. The combined US-guided PECS block and AV puncture was performed successfully in 35 (97.2%) patients without the need for fluoroscopy or venography. AV access for each lead was achieved in a single attempt in 80.6% of cases. The time for both PECS block and AV puncture was 223.6 ± 52.1 s, including the time to apply incision site anesthesia. Additional sedatives and/or local anesthetics were required in two patients during procedure. Visual analog scale average of the patients in the 1st, 6th, and 24th h was 3.7 ± 1.14. 1.61 ± 1.29, and 0.08 ± 0.28, respectively. After the procedure, four patients (three of them woman) needed analgesics. There were no venous access-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: This new combined technique maintains both surgical and postoperative analgesia and prevents vascular access-related complications without significant increase on procedure time.


Subject(s)
Axilla/blood supply , Nerve Block/methods , Phlebotomy , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Thoracic Nerves , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Aged , Defibrillators, Implantable , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...