A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of mFOLFOX6 + Cetuximab as Induction Chemotherapy to Achieve R0 Surgical Resection for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases (NEXTO Trial).

BACKGROUND: The effect of cetuximab plus mFOLFOX on downsizing of the tumors for curative resection has yet to be assessed for patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study aimed to assess the oncologic benefit of cetuximab plus mFOLFOX for wild-type KRAS patients with advanced CRLMs. METHODS: In this multicenter phase 2 trial, patients with technically unresectable tumor and/or five or more CRLMs harboring wild-type KRAS were treated with mFOLFOX plus cetuximab. The patients were assessed for resectability after 4 treatments, and then every 2 months up to 12 treatments. Patients with resectable disease were offered surgery after a waiting period of 1 month. The primary end point of the study was the R0 resection rate. The secondary end points were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry Clinical Trials Registry (no. C000007923). RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2015, 50 patients from 13 centers were enrolled in this trial. Two patients were excluded because they had not received induction therapy. The 48 patients had a complete response rate of 0% and a partial response rate of 64.6%. For 26 R0 resections (54.2%) and 5 R1 resections (10.4%), no mortality occurred. During a median follow-up period of 31 months, the median OS for all the patients was calculated to be 41 months (95% confidence interval, 28-not reached). The 3-year OS rate was 59%. CONCLUSION: For patients with advanced CRLMs harboring wild-type KRAS, cetuximab administered in combination with mFOLFOX yields high response rates, leading to significantly high R0 resection rates and favorable prognoses.

Factors affecting successful palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal dissemination from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nonresectable colorectal cancer often causes malignant intestinal obstruction due to peritoneal dissemination. However, no previous report has specifically investigated which patients, with peritoneal dissemination from colorectal cancer, would actually benefit from palliative surgery. This study defines the selection criteria for patients who are likely to benefit from palliative surgery. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent palliative surgery for malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal dissemination from colorectal cancer. In all cases, the advanced and nonresectable nature of the tumor was confirmed at laparotomy. Clinical factors such as age, gender, serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen, amount of ascites, location of the primary cancer, surgical procedure, and postoperative chemotherapy were analyzed for prognostic significance in symptom-free and overall survival using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: All the postoperative courses were uneventful. Obstruction recurred after a median symptom-free interval of 61 days in the group with less than 100 ml of ascites, whereas it recurred after 9 days in the group with more than 100 ml of ascites. Symptom-free survival rates in patients who manifested ascites were significantly lower than in those without ascites (P = 0.0321, log-rank method). The symptom-free and overall survival rates in patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy were significantly higher (P = 0.0225 and 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Palliative surgery can be performed effectively for patients without ascites. For patients who do not meet this criterion, a non-surgical procedure may be preferable.