Risk of transfusion-transmitted infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from blood donors in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) essentially affects respiratory organs and tissues. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia is often associated with more severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to cases without RNAemia. To determine the impact of the pandemic on transfusion medicine, particularly transfusion-related infection, we examined the frequency of blood donation with RNAemia, the viral RNA (vRNA) concentration, and any possibility of transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) among transfusion recipients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: vRNA was examined in plasma/serum samples from 496 of 513 blood donors who reported having been infected with SARS-CoV-2 within 2 weeks of donation among a total of ca. 9.9 million blood donations in Japan between January 15, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The clinical course of patients transfused with the blood component containing vRNA was also examined. RESULTS: vRNA was detected in 23 of 496 samples. The median period from blood donation to COVID-19 onset was 1 day in 16 RNAemia-positive donors. Most samples had vRNA concentrations below the limit of quantification. Three patients were transfused with either a packed red blood cell or platelet concentrate that tested positive for vRNA, showing no COVID-19 symptoms and testing negative for vRNA in post-transfusion blood. CONCLUSION: The rate of RNAemia was 4.6% among blood donors who were found to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 shortly after donation, and vRNA concentrations in their donated blood were extremely low. There was no evidence of TTI in the recipients transfused with RNAemia-positive blood components. TTI risk in SARS-CoV-2 is negligible.

Marked reduction in the incidence of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus infection after the introduction of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and individual donation nucleic acid amplification screening in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, 41 million blood donations have been screened for hepatitis B virus (HBV) during the past 8.4 years using individual donation nucleic acid amplification testing (ID-NAT) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) screening. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Transfusion-transmitted HBV infection (TT-HBV) incidence was examined. Donated blood implicated in TT-HBV was analyzed for infection stage and DNA levels. Causative HBV strains were phylogenetically analyzed. RESULTS: Among 5162 (0.013%) ID-NAT positives, window period (WP) and occult HBV infection (OBI) accounted for 3.4% (176) and 11.5% (594), respectively. No OBI-related TT-HBV occurred. Seven blood donations caused eight TT-HBV cases, six of which were in the pre-ID-NAT WP, leaving one with an unresolved infection stage. Seven cases were caused by platelet concentrate (180 mL plasma) and one case by fresh-frozen plasma (200 mL plasma), which contained estimated infectious doses varying between 2 and 2300 HBV virions. HBV subgenotypes in five cases were HBV/A2. Complete genome sequences of the transmitting A2 strains were nearly identical (99.6%-100%) and clustered in a group that included HBV/HIV-1 coinfections and a higher proportion of donors in the acute infection phase (69%) than the other group of HBV/A2 sequences (5%). DISCUSSION: The incidence of observed TT-HBV cases has significantly reduced to 0.19 per million in the ID-NAT screening period. OBI-related TT-HBV was eliminated by anti-HBc screening. Established TT-HBV cases were caused by blood products with large plasma volumes containing extremely low HBV concentrations derived from blood donors at a very early infection stage.

Transfusion-transmitted HBV infection with isolated anti-HBs-positive blood.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive individuals with isolated anti-HBs are found among HBV vaccine recipients and healthy blood donors with no vaccination history. HBV infectivity from blood transfusions derived from such individuals remains unclear. CASE PRESENTATION: A male patient who received transfusion with blood negative for individual donation-NAT, HBsAg and anti-HBc but weakly positive for anti-HBs developed typical transfusion-transmitted (TT)-HBV with anti-HBc response. The responsible blood donor was a frequent repeat donor showing a marked increase in anti-HBs titer without anti-HBc response 84 days after index donation. Test results for his past donations showed transient viremia with very low viral load and fluctuating low-level anti-HBs. The HBV vaccination history of this donor was unknown. DISCUSSION: Anti-HBs and anti-HBc kinetics of the donor suggest a second antibody response to new HBV challenge, representing a vaccine breakthrough case. On the other hand, transient low-level viremia and fluctuating anti-HBs in the test results of past donations suggested chronic occult HBV infection with isolated anti-HBs. CONCLUSION: Whatever the basic infection state, blood donors with isolated weak anti-HBs may include a small population with a risk of causing TT-HBV. Identifying individuals harboring such TT-HBV risk among individuals positive only for anti-HBs is difficult under current screening strategies. Active surveillance for the occurrence of TT-HBV with blood positive only for anti-HBs is necessary.

Optimal titer of anti-HBs in blood components derived from donors with anti-HBc.

BACKGROUND: The ultimate strategy to cope with transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection caused by transfusion of blood from donors with historical HBV infection is to reject all donors having anti-HBV core antigen (anti-HBc). However, this strategy would result in a huge loss of blood donors and subsequent blood inventory collapse. On the other hand, anti-HBc-positive blood is reportedly not infectious when containing more than 100 mIU/mL of anti-HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Japan, anti-HBc-positive blood has been used for transfusion if it contained 200 mIU/mL or more of anti-HBs. First, to verify the screening policy, clinical outcomes for transfusion of such blood were analyzed for the 2008-2012 period. Second, human hepatocyte-repopulated severe combined immunodeficiency mice were inoculated with HBV preincubated with varying doses of anti-HBs, then viremic status was followed. The effects of anti-HBs across different HBV genotypes were also investigated. RESULTS: Twenty-three transfusion-transmitted HBV infections related to anti-HBc-positive blood components were identified. None of the blood responsible for these cases contained 200 mIU/mL or more of anti-HBs. When 100 µL of plasma containing 104 copies of HBV and 20 mIU of anti-HBs was injected into severe combined immunodeficiency mice, no viremia was detected within 13 weeks. Genotype C anti-HBs was capable of total inhibition of genotype A HBV replication, whereas genotype A anti-HBs inhibited genotype C HBV to a lesser extent. CONCLUSION: Anti-HBc-positive blood containing 200 mIU/mL or more of anti-HBs appears safe as a transfusion component. HBV vaccination seems effective between HBV genotypes A and C.

Sequence analyses of variable cytomegalovirus genes for distinction between breast milk- and transfusion-transmitted infections in very-low-birth-weight infants.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) transmission to very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBWIs) sometimes induces serious clinical symptoms. Although breast milk is considered a major source of transmission, transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) infection is often suspected when CMV disease develops after transfusion. Thus, it is clinically important to distinguish between transfusion-transmitted and breast milk-transmitted CMV infections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Study A: The incidence of acquired CMV transmission was prospectively investigated in 65 VLBWIs. Study B: To determine the transmission routes in 18 TT-CMV-suspected VLBWIs who had been reported in our hemovigilance system, we performed polymerase chain reaction for CMV DNA in fed breast milk and/or repository blood samples related to transfused leukoreduced blood products. Furthermore, we evaluated the identity of CMV strains in patients' urine/blood samples and fed breast milk by sequence analyses of variable CMV genes UL139 and UL146. RESULTS: Study A: Acquired CMV infection was found in 4 of 65 VLBWIs (6.2%). Study B: CMV DNA was detected in fed breast milk for 12 of 14 TT-CMV-suspected cases, for which breast milk was available. Furthermore, CMV DNA sequence-matching rates between fed breast milk and patients' urine/blood for both UL139 and UL146 genes were 100% or nearly 100% in 11 patients. In contrast, repository blood samples for 11 of 14 patients were CMV DNA negative. CONCLUSION: CMV is principally transmitted through breast milk in VLBWIs. The risk of TT-CMV seems to be extremely low when using leukoreduced blood products. Sequence analyses of the variable CMV genes are useful for evaluating CMV transmission routes.

Sequence analysis of two variable cytomegalovirus genes for distinction between transfusion- and breast milk-transmitted infections in a very-low-birthweight infant.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in very-low-birthweight infants can lead to serious clinical consequences. When CMV-related symptoms occur after transfusion, CMV transmission is often attributed to the transfusion products rather than to breast milk. However, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between transfusion-transmitted and breast milk-transmitted CMV infections. PATIENT AND METHODS: A patient was born at 27 gestational weeks with a weight of 689 g. He was transfused with leukoreduced red blood cells (LR-RBCs), which were later found to be CMV seropositive and CMV DNA positive. He was also fed with CMV DNA-positive breast milk. Thereafter, he developed CMV disease with thrombocytopenia and jaundice. To determine the route of transmission, we analyzed the sequences of two variable CMV genes, UL139 and UL146, by direct sequence analysis. We also performed deep sequence analysis to determine whether there were polyclonal CMV strains in the LR-RBCs transfused. RESULTS: CMV DNA sequence-matching rates for the LR-RBCs and the patient's blood were 64.6% for the UL139 gene and 68.6% for the UL146 gene. In contrast, the sequences of these genes in the patient's blood were 100% matched with those in the breast milk. Furthermore, by deep sequence analysis, the CMV strain found in the patient's blood was not detected in the LR-RBCs transfused. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the pathogenic CMV strain was transmitted through breast milk, which is consistent with the claims that transfusion-transmitted CMV infection due to leukoreduced blood products is uncommon.