Effect of a fixed combination of ripasudil and brimonidine on aqueous humor dynamics in mice.

Ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination (K-232) simultaneously targets three different intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering mechanisms, increasing trabecular meshwork outflow and uveoscleral outflow, and reducing aqueous humor production Vascularly, ripasudil induces transient vasodilation, brimonidine transient vasoconstriction. Investigating effects on IOP, aqueous dynamics, and EVP in mice eyes by microneedle and constant-pressure perfusion methods, and on cytoskeletal and fibrotic proteins changes in HTM cells by a gel contraction assay and immunocytochemistry. Ripasudil, K-232, and brimonidine droplets significantly reduced IOP at 30 min, with K-232 sustaining the effect at 60 min. For EVP, only K-232 exhibited reduced EVP until 60 min after instillation. In vitro, ripasudil inhibited gel contractility and TGFß2-induced fibrotic changes, whereas brimonidine did not. K-232 significantly lowered IOPs in mice by combining the effects of ripasudil and brimonidine. Brimonidine alone also showed IOP reductions with enhanced outflow facility, and the drug did not interfere with the effects of ripasudil on the trabecular meshwork outflow; K-232 and ripasudil alone both significantly lowered the EVP and enhanced outflow facility, demonstrating that K-232 efficiently reduces IOPs.

The Roles Played by FP/EP3 Receptors During Pressure-lowering in Mouse Eyes Mediated by a Dual FP/EP3 Receptor Agonist.

Purpose: We investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of topical sepetaprost (SPT), a dual agonist of the FP and EP3 receptors. We explored whether certain receptors mediated the hypotensive effect of SPT and outflow facility changes in C57BL/6 mice (wild-type [WT]) and FP and EP3 receptor-deficient mice (FPKO and EP3KO mice, respectively). Methods: IOP was measured using a microneedle. Outflow facility was measured using a two-level, constant-pressure perfusion method. Results: SPT significantly reduced IOP for 8 hours after administration to WT mice. The 2-hour IOP reductions afforded by latanoprost were 15.3 ± 2.5, 1.8 ± 2.0, and 12.3 ± 2.4% in WT, FPKO, and EP3KO mice, respectively; the SPT figures were 13.6 ± 2.1, 5.9 ± 2.7, and 6.6 ± 2.6%, respectively. Latanoprost-mediated IOP reduction was significantly decreased in FPKO mice, and SPT-mediated IOP reduction was reduced in both FPKO and EP3KO mice. At 6 hours after administration, latanoprost did not significantly reduce the IOP in any tested mouse strain. SPT-mediated IOP reduction was reduced in both FPKO and EP3KO mice. IOP reduction at 6 hours was significantly higher after simultaneous administration of selective FP and EP3 receptor agonists, but IOP did not fall on administration of (only) a selective EP3 receptor agonist. SPT significantly increased outflow facility in WT mice, but less so in FPKO and EP3KO mice. Conclusions: The IOP-lowering effect of SPT lasted longer than that of latanoprost. Our data imply that this may be attributable to augmented outflow facility mediated by the FP and EP3 receptors.

Contribution of prostanoid FP receptor and prostaglandins in transient inflammatory ocular hypertension.

We explored the involvement of FP receptor and endogenous prostaglandins (PGs) in transient ocular hypertension (OH) induced by PGE2 or PGF2α in mouse eyes. PGE2 and PGF2α were topically applied to induce transient OH in Wild-type (WT) and FP-, EP1-, EP2-, and EP3-deficient (knockout [KO]) mice. To suppress endogenous PG production, the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug nepafenac was applied topically before treatment. PGE2 and PGF2α induced significant OH in the WT, FPKO, and EP1-3KO mice compared to the control 30 min after instillation, and the increase in IOP at 30 or 60 min after instillation in FPKO mice was significantly higher than that in the WT mice. The effects of PGF2α on the increase in IOP were significantly weaker than those of PGE2, especially in EP1KO and EP3KO mice. Transient OH induced by PGE2 and PGF2α was significantly attenuated by nepafenac treatment in FPKO mice. Transient OH was induced by PGE2 and PGF2α in WT, FPKO, and EP1-3KO mice, which was enhanced in FPKO mice. This OH was significantly diminished by nepafenac treatment in FPKO mice, suggesting that FP receptor may have an important naïve physiological role in the eye, and could regulate IOP elevation during PG-associated ocular inflammation.

Interaction Between Pilocarpine and Ripasudil on Intraocular Pressure, Pupil Diameter, and the Aqueous-Outflow Pathway.

Purpose: To explore interactions between pilocarpine and the ROCK inhibitor, ripasudil, on IOP and pupil diameter in human eyes, and morphological and functional changes in outflow tissues in vitro. Methods: IOP and pupil diameter were measured after pilocarpine and/or ripasudil, which were topically applied in healthy subjects. Human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells were used in a gel contraction assay, for the evaluation of phosphorylation of myosin light chain and cofilin, and immunostaining for cytoskeletal proteins. Porcine ciliary muscle (CM) was used in a CM contraction assay. The permeability of human Schlemm's canal endothelial (SCE) cells was evaluated by measuring transendothelial electrical resistance and fluorescein permeability. Results: Both pilocarpine and ripasudil significantly reduced IOP in human eyes, but pilocarpine interfered with ripasudil-induced IOP reduction when concomitantly introduced. Ripasudil significantly inhibited gel contraction, TGFß2-induced stress fiber formation, α-smooth muscle actin expression, and phosphorylation of both myosin light chain and cofilin in HTM cells. Pilocarpine reduced these effects, significantly inhibited the ripasudil-induced HTM cell responses to TGFß2 stimulation, and increased the permeability in SCE cells. In CM, ripasudil inhibited pilocarpine-stimulated contraction, but ripasudil did not have significant effects on pilocarpine-induced miosis. Conclusions: Pilocarpine interfered with the direct effects of ROCK inhibitor on the conventional outflow pathway leading to IOP reduction and cytoskeletal changes in trabecular meshwork cells, but did not affect the relaxation effect of the ROCK inhibitor. It is therefore necessary to consider possible interference between these two drugs, which both affect the conventional outflow.