Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Am J Hypertens ; 36(2): 90-101, 2023 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inconsistencies between the office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) values (described as white-coat hypertension or masked hypertension) may be attributable in part to differences in the BP monitoring devices used. METHODS: We studied consistency in the classification of BP control (well-controlled BP vs. uncontrolled BP) among office, home, and ambulatory BPs by using a validated "all-in-one" BP monitoring device. In the nationwide, general practitioner-based multicenter HI-JAMP study, 2,322 hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive drugs underwent office BP measurements and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), consecutively followed by 5-day home BP monitoring (HBPM), for a total of seven BP measurement days. RESULTS: Using the thresholds of the JSH2019 and ESC2018 guidelines, the patients with consistent classification of well-controlled status in the office (<140 mmHg) and home systolic BP (SBP) (<135 mmHg) (n = 970) also tended to have well-controlled 24-hour SBP (<130 mmHg) (n = 808, 83.3%). The patients with the consistent classification of uncontrolled status in office and home SBP (n = 579) also tended to have uncontrolled 24-hour SBP (n = 444, 80.9%). Among the patients with inconsistent classifications of office and home BP control (n = 803), 46.1% had inconsistent ABPM-vs.-HBPM out-of-office BP control status. When the 2017 ACC/AHA thresholds were applied as an alternative, the results were essentially the same. CONCLUSIONS: The combined assessment of the office and home BP is useful in clinical practice. Especially for patients whose office BP classification and home BP classification conflict, the complementary clinical use of both HBPM and ABPM might be recommended.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , White Coat Hypertension , Humans , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis
2.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 22(9): 1585-1593, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32810338

ABSTRACT

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular and renal complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and represent guideline-recommended therapy in this indication. However, precise mechanisms underlying the beneficial cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are not fully understood. This study investigated the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor, luseogliflozin, on arterial properties and home blood pressure (BP) in patients with T2DM. This multicenter, single-arm study enrolled adults with T2DM, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5%-8.9% in the previous 4 weeks, and an indication for new/additional antidiabetic therapy. Luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/d was given for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was change in cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) from baseline to Week 4 and Week 12. Home and office BP, BP variability, and metabolic parameters were secondary endpoints. Forty-seven patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.7 years) treated with luseogliflozin were included in the full analysis set. CAVI did not change significantly from baseline (mean [95% confidence interval] 8.67 [8.37-8.97]) to Week 12 (8.64 [8.38-8.91]; P = .750), but there were significant reductions from baseline in morning home BP, HbA1c, body weight, body mass index, and serum uric acid levels during luseogliflozin therapy. The reduction in morning home systolic BP was ≥ 5 mm Hg and was independent of baseline BP and BP control status. In conclusion, there was no change in arterial stiffness (based on CAVI) during treatment with luseogliflozin, but changes in BP and metabolic parameters were consistent with the known beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Hypertension , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Pulse Wave Analysis , Sorbitol/analogs & derivatives , Uric Acid
3.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 22(7): 1208-1215, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32530542

ABSTRACT

The value of the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) increases with age. All large-scale studies of the CAVI have investigated patients <80 years old. Thus, the clinical characteristics of high CAVI in patients aged 80 or more remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated (1) the CAVI in very elderly patients and (2) the determinants of a high CAVI in high-risk patients, including very elderly patients. The Cardiovascular Prognostic Coupling Study in Japan (Coupling Registry) is a prospective observational study of Japanese outpatients with any cardiovascular risk factors. We enrolled 5109 patients from 30 institutions (average age 68.7 ± 11.4 years, 52.4% males). We investigated the determinants of the CAVI by separating the patients into three groups: 970 middle-aged (<60 years), 3252 elderly (60-79 years), and 887 very elderly (≥80 years) patients. The CAVI values of the males were significantly higher those of the females in all age groups (<60 years: 7.81 ± 1.11 vs. 7.38 ± 0.99, P < .001; 60-79 years: 9.20 ± 1.29 vs. 8.66 ± 1.07, P < .001; ≥80 years: 10.26 ± 1.39 vs. 9.51 ± 1.12, P < .001). In all age groups, the CAVI of the patients with diabetes/glucose tolerance disorder was higher than that of the patients without diabetes/glucose tolerance disorder (<60 years: 7.82 ± 1.22 vs 7.58 ± 1.03, P = .002; 60-79 years: 9.23 ± 1.20 vs 8.78 ± 1.19, P < .001; ≥80 years: 10.04 ± 1.24 vs 9.75 ± 1.32, P = .002). The determinants of the CAVI in these very elderly patients were age, male sex, low BMI, and mean blood pressure. Diabetes/glucose tolerance disorder and glucose were independently associated with the CAVI in the patients aged <60 years and 60-79 years, but not in those aged ≥80 years after adjusting for other covariates.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Vascular Stiffness , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ankle , Ankle Brachial Index , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Registries , Risk Factors
4.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 22(3): 465-474, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32092246

ABSTRACT

Vascular biomarkers, including the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), are increasingly being recognized as important indicators of cardiovascular risk. CAVI has been shown to have good discriminative ability for detecting new-onset hypertension, but results of studies investigating cardiovascular risk prediction are inconsistent. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on the prognostic value of changes in CAVI over time. The Cardiovascular Prognostic Coupling study was designed to determine the impact of baseline CAVI and changes in CAVI on cardiovascular events in a Japanese cohort. The design of the ongoing, multicenter, prospective, observational registry and baseline characteristics of the enrolled population are reported. Eligible consecutive patients were aged ≥30 years, had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, and were being treated according to relevant Japanese guidelines. The primary outcome is time to onset of a major cardiovascular event (a composite of cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke of unknown etiology, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular intervention for angina pectoris, and sudden death). Screening and enrollment occurred over a period of 3 years, followed by ≥7 years of follow-up, with CAVI determined annually. A total of 5279 patients were registered, of whom 5109 had baseline data available and will be included in future analyses. Mean CAVI at baseline was 8.8 ± 1.4. The proportion of patients with CAVI of <8, 8-10 or >10 was 25.3%, 57.0%, and 17.7%, respectively. Data from this registry should provide information on the significance of baseline CAVI and change in CAVI as indicators of cardiovascular prognosis in a representative patient population.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Vascular Stiffness , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Factors
5.
Circ J ; 81(7): 948-957, 2017 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28321001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is an independent risk factor of cardiovascular events. The NOCTURNE study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) using our recently developed information and communication technology (ICT) nocturnal home BP monitoring (HBPM) device, was performed to compare the nocturnal HBP-lowering effects of differential ARB-based combination therapies in 411 Japanese patients with nocturnal hypertension (HT).Methods and Results:Patients with nocturnal BP ≥120/70 mmHg at baseline even under ARB therapy (100 mg irbesartan daily) were enrolled. The ARB/CCB combination therapy (irbesartan 100 mg+amlodipine 5 mg) achieved a significantly greater reduction in nocturnal home systolic BP (primary endpoint) than the ARB/diuretic combination (daily irbesartan 100 mg+trichlormethiazide 1 mg) (-14.4 vs. -10.5 mmHg, P<0.0001), independently of urinary sodium excretion and/or nocturnal BP dipping status. However, the change in nocturnal home systolic BP was comparable among the post-hoc subgroups with higher salt sensitivity (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and elderly patients). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first RCT demonstrating the feasibility of clinical assessment of nocturnal BP by ICT-nocturnal HBPM. The ARB/CCB combination was shown to be superior to ARB/diuretic in patients with uncontrolled nocturnal HT independently of sodium intake, despite the similar impact of the 2 combinations in patients with higher salt sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Amlodipine/administration & dosage , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Biphenyl Compounds/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Diuretics/administration & dosage , Hypertension , Tetrazoles/administration & dosage , Trichlormethiazide/administration & dosage , Aged , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Communication , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Irbesartan , Male , Middle Aged
6.
Hypertension ; 68(1): 54-61, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27160200

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Our aim is to determine the optimal time schedule for home blood pressure (BP) monitoring that best predicts stroke and coronary artery disease in general practice. The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study is a nationwide practice-based study that included 4310 Japanese with a history of or risk factors for cardiovascular disease, or both (mean age, 65 years; 79% used antihypertensive medication). Home BP measures were taken twice daily (morning and evening) over 14 days at baseline. During a mean follow-up of 4 years (16 929 person-years), 74 stroke and 77 coronary artery disease events occurred. Morning systolic BP (SBP) improved the discrimination of incident stroke (C statistics, 0.802; 95% confidence interval, 0.692-0.911) beyond traditional risk factors including office SBP (0.756; 0.646-0.866), whereas the changes were smaller with evening SBP (0.764; 0.653-0.874). The addition of evening SBP to the model (including traditional risk factors plus morning SBP) significantly reduced the discrimination of incident stroke (C statistics difference, -0.008; 95% confidence interval: -0.015 to -0.008; P=0.03). The category-free net reclassification improvement (0.3606; 95% confidence interval, 0.1317-0.5896), absolute integrated discrimination improvement (0.015; SE, 0.005), and relative integrated discrimination improvement (58.3%; all P<0.01) with the addition of morning SBP to the model (including traditional risk factors) were greater than those with evening SBP and with combined morning and evening SBP. Neither morning nor evening SBP improved coronary artery disease risk prediction. Morning home SBP itself should be evaluated to ensure best stroke prediction in clinical practice, at least in Japan. This should be confirmed in the different ethnic groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/. Unique identifier: UMIN000000894.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Circadian Rhythm , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Stroke/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Databases, Factual , Female , General Practice/methods , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Distribution , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/physiopathology , Survival Rate
7.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 17(5): 340-8, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25689113

ABSTRACT

To study whether sleep blood pressure (BP) self-measured at home is associated with organ damage, the authors analyzed the data of 2562 participants in the J-HOP study who self-measured sleep BP using a home BP monitoring (HBPM) device, three times during sleep (2 am, 3 am, 4 am), as well as the home morning and evening BPs. The mean sleep home systolic BPs (SBPs) were all correlated with urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), maximum carotid intima-media thickness, and plasma N-terminal pro-hormone pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) (all P<.001). After controlling for clinic SBP and home morning and evening SBPs, associations of home sleep SBP with UACR, LVMI, and baPWV remained significant (all P<.008). Even in patients with home morning BP <135/85 mm Hg, 27% exhibited masked nocturnal hypertension with home sleep SBP ≥120 mm Hg and had higher UACR and NTproBNP. Masked nocturnal hypertension, which is associated with advanced organ damage, remains unrecognized by conventional HBPM.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure/physiology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Sleep/physiology , Aged , Biomarkers/metabolism , Circadian Rhythm , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Hypertension/metabolism , Hypertension/pathology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/diagnosis , Risk Factors
8.
Am J Hypertens ; 27(7): 939-47, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24473255

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several guidelines recommend that home blood pressure (HBP) be measured both in the morning and in the evening. However, there have been fewer reports about the clinical significance of morning HBP than about the clinical significance of evening HBP. METHODS: Our study included 4,310 patients recruited for the Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure Study who had one or more cardiovascular risk factors. We measured morning and evening HBP, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), maximum carotid intima media thickness (IMT), N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (Hs-cTnT). RESULTS: The correlation coefficients for the associations between morning systolic BP (SBP) and log-transformed baPWV, NT-proBNP, or Hs-cTnT were significantly greater than the corresponding relationships for evening SBP (all P < 0.01). The goodness-of-fit of the associations between morning home SBP and UACR (P < 0.05) or baPWV (P < 0.01) was improved by adding evening home SBP to the SBP measurement. In contrast, the goodness-of-fit values of the associations between evening SBP and UACR (P < 0.001), LVMI (P < 0.05), baPWV (P < 0.001), NT-proBNP (P < 0.001), and Hs-cTnT (P < 0.001) were improved by adding morning home SBP to the SBP measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Morning BP and evening BP provide equally useful information for subclinical target organ damage, yet multivariate modeling highlighted the stand-alone predictive ability of morning BP.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure/physiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Aged , Albuminuria/complications , Ankle Brachial Index , Carotid Intima-Media Thickness , Circadian Rhythm , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...