Is it meaningful to add mesh reinforcement to laparoscopic fundoplication for esophageal hiatal hernias in the patients with high risk of hiatal hernia recurrence?

BACKGROUND: While laparoscopic fundoplication is a standard surgical procedure for patients with esophageal hiatal hernias, the postoperative recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias is a problem for patients with giant hernias, elderly patients, or obese patients. Although there are some reports indicating that reinforcement with mesh is effective, there are differing opinions regarding the use thereof. The aim of this study is to investigate whether mesh reinforcement is effective for laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with esophageal hiatus hernias. METHODS: The subjects included 280 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication as the initial surgery for giant esophageal hiatal hernias, elderly patients aged 75 years or older, and obese patients with a BMI of 28 or higher, who were considered at risk of recurrent hiatal hernias based on the previous reports. Of the subject patients, 91 cases without mesh and 86 cases following the stabilization of mesh use were extracted to compare the postoperative course including the pathology, symptom scores, surgical outcome, and recurrence of esophageal hiatus hernias. RESULTS: The preoperative conditions indicated that the degree of esophageal hiatal hernias was high in the mesh group (p = 0.0001), while the preoperative symptoms indicated that the score of heartburn was high in the non-mesh group (p = 0.0287). Although the surgical results indicated that the mesh group underwent a longer operation time (p < 0.0001) and a higher frequency of intraoperative complications (p = 0.037), the rate of recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernia was significantly low (p = 0.049), with the rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis also tending to be low (p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Mesh reinforcement in laparoscopic fundoplication for esophageal hiatal hernias contributes to preventing the recurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias when it comes to patient options based on these criteria.

The pathological conditions and surgical outcomes depending on the degree of hernia in the intra-thoracic stomach.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of patients requiring surgery for intra-thoracic stomach (ITS) has been increasing due to the effects of obesity and gibbus due to aging. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of the degree of hernia on the pathological conditions and surgical outcomes in ITS patients. METHODS: ITS was defined as cases in which over 50% of the stomach had deviated into the mediastinum by esophagogastric fluoroscopy and/or computed tomography, with 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery as the initial surgery included. We compared the pathological conditions and surgical outcomes by dividing the subjects into 3 groups: Group A: 50%- < 75%; Group B: 75%- < 100%; and Group C: 100% (upside-down stomach), depending on the degree of deviation into the mediastinum of the stomach. RESULTS: The breakdown of patients was 33 in Group A, 21 in Group B, and 11 in Group C. Regarding the preoperative pathological conditions, Group C had a high body mass index (BMI) and a low score for factor V according to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (p = 0.0109, p = 0.0062, respectively). While the surgical results indicated that the operation time was extended depending on the degree of hernia (p = 0.0051), there was no marked difference in other surgical outcomes or the postoperative course among the three groups, with a high degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In the case of ITS, although the operation time was extended depending on the degree of the hernia, the surgical outcomes were the same, and overall good results were obtained.

Correlation between our symptom-based scoring system and the Eckardt score for assessing patients with esophageal achalasia.

PURPOSE: The Eckardt score (ES) is a famous scoring system used for assessing achalasia patients. We studied the correlation between our scoring system and the ES and examined the relationship between each score and the pathophysiology of achalasia. METHODS: The subjects were 143 patients with diagnosed achalasia. We assessed the frequency and degree of dysphagia, regurgitation (vomiting), and chest pain on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with the product of the frequency and degree score defined as each symptom score (0-16). The sum of the three symptom scores was the Total Symptom Score (TSS). We then studied the correlation between the TSS and the ES, including whether these scores reflected the pathophysiology. RESULTS: The median scores were 20 for TSS and 6 for the ES, indicating a high correlation between the two scores (r = 0.7280, p < 0.0001). A relationship was found between the morphologic type and both scores (TSS: p = 0.002, ES: p = 0.0036). On creating a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the Straight type and each score, the AUC was 0.6740 for TSS and 0.6628 for ES. CONCLUSIONS: A high positive correlation was found between the TSS and the ES. Both scoring systems reflected the morphologic type well, demonstrating that the TSS was a scoring system comparable to the ES.

Relationship between esophageal achalasia subtypes and esophageal clearance.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and pathological evaluation of esophageal achalasia have been improved dramatically by the development of high-resolution manometry. It is currently known to be divided into three subtypes. However, the differences between subtypes in terms of esophageal clearance remain unclear. AIMS: To compare the pathology of subtypes in patients with esophageal achalasia from the perspective of esophageal clearance. METHODS: We classified the patients diagnosed with esophageal achalasia into three subtypes based on the high-resolution manometry findings and compared the patient background, esophagography findings, esophageal manometry findings, timed barium esophagogram (TBE) findings, and their symptoms. We also calculated the esophageal clearance rate from TBE to investigate the relationship with the subtypes. RESULTS: There were 71 cases of Type I, 140 cases of Type II, and 10 cases of Type III. No differences by subtype were found in patient background or symptoms. Regarding the esophageal manometry findings, the integrated relaxation pressure was high in Type II (p = 0.0006). The esophagography revealed a mild degree of esophageal flexion in Type III (p = 0.0022) and a high degree of esophageal dilation in Type I and II (p = 0.0227). The esophageal clearance rate in descending order was: Type III, II, and I (height: p = 0.0302, width: p = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: The subtypes by high-resolution manometry diagnosis had an association with the esophagography findings and best reflected the esophageal clearance, with no correlation to the patient backgrounds and symptoms.

Redo laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication versus rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure and rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with failed Heller myotomy. METHODS: We identified patients who had undergone redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure or rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy from August 1996 to September 2019 and assessed the patients' characteristics, timed barium swallow results, symptom scores before/after surgery, surgical outcomes, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure, and 14 underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy. Blood loss (p = 0.001) and intraoperative complications rate (p = 0.003) were lower and the operative time (p > 0.001) and observation period (p = 0.009) shorter in patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy than in patients who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. Patients who underwent rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had a higher rate of postoperative reflux esophagitis (p = 0.033) than those who underwent redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. After the interventions, the dysphagia symptoms were improved for both groups. Furthermore, both groups expressed satisfaction with their respective procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy was associated with better surgical outcomes than redo laparoscopic Heller-Dor for patients with failed Heller myotomy. However, rescue peroral endoscopic myotomy had higher rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis.

Is an objective evaluation essential for determining the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic surgery among patients with esophageal achalasia?

BACKGROUND: Despite a high degree of satisfaction with laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia, some cases show no improvement in postoperative esophageal clearance. We investigated whether an objective evaluation is essential for determining the therapeutic effect of LHD. METHODS: We investigated the difference in symptoms, regarding esophageal clearance, using timed barium esophagogram (TBE), in 306 esophageal achalasia patients with high postoperative satisfaction who underwent LHD. Furthermore, these patients were divided into two groups, in accordance with the difference in postoperative esophageal clearance, in order to compare the preoperative pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical results. RESULTS: Although the poor postoperative esophageal clearance group (117 cases, 38%) was mostly male and the ratio of Sigmoid type was high compared to the good postoperative esophageal clearance group (p = 0.046, p = 0.001, respectively); in patients with high surgical satisfaction, there was no difference in terms of preoperative symptom scores and surgical results. However, although the satisfaction level was high in the poor esophageal clearance group, the scores in terms of the postoperative dysphagia and vomiting were high (p = 0.0018 and p = 0.004, respectively). The AUC was 0.9842 upon ROC analysis regarding the presence or absence of clearance at 2 min following postoperative TBE and the postoperative feeling of difficulty swallowing score, with a cut-off value of 2 points (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 100%) in cases with a high degree of surgical satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The esophageal clearance ability can be predicted by subjective evaluation, based on the postoperative symptom scores; so, an objective evaluation is not essential in cases with high surgical satisfaction.

Risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia.

Peptic esophagitis can occur as a complication of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) among patients with esophageal achalasia. The goal of this study was to identify the characteristics of patients who have developed peptic esophagitis following LHD surgery along with the risk factors associated with the occurrence of peptic esophagitis. Among the 447 cases consisting of esophageal achalasia patients who underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not peptic esophagitis occurred following surgery. We also attempted to use univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors for peptic esophagitis occurring following surgery. Esophagitis following surgery was confirmed in 67 cases (15.0%). With respect to the patient backgrounds for cases in which peptic esophagitis had occurred, a significantly higher number were male patients, with a significantly high occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery in terms of surgical outcomes, along with a high occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias in terms of postoperative course (P = 0.045, 0.041, and 0.022, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in terms of age, BMI, disease duration, preoperative symptoms, esophageal manometric findings, esophageal barium findings, and esophageal clearance. A multivariate analysis indicated independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD as being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias. Peptic esophagitis occurred following LHD in 15% of cases. Independent risk factors for the occurrence of peptic esophagitis following LHD included being male, the occurrence of mucosal perforation during surgery, and the occurrence of esophageal hiatal hernias following surgery.

The patient characteristics of esophageal carcinoma following laparoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: It is common knowledge that esophageal achalasia patients have a high risk of developing esophageal carcinoma. The present study assessed the characteristics of esophageal carcinoma patients following laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) for esophageal achalasia. METHOD: Among 622 cases which were esophageal achalasia patients and underwent LHD as the primary surgery, we compared the patient background, pathophysiology, symptoms, and surgical outcomes according to whether or not esophageal carcinoma occurred following surgery. RESULTS: Six cases (0.96%) of postoperative esophageal carcinoma were confirmed. The characteristics of the cases in which esophageal carcinoma occurred were older age, longer disease duration (p = 0.0362 and 0.0028, respectively), decreased sphincter pressure of the lower esophagus, a high rate of sigmoid esophagus, and a long esophagus lateral diameter (p = 0.0214, 0.001, and 0.0416, respectively). Moreover, no differences in surgical outcomes were confirmed and there were no differences in symptoms from before and following surgery. CONCLUSION: The characteristics of esophageal carcinoma patients with achalasia following laparoscopic myotomy were an older age, longer disease duration, and greater progression of disease pathophysiology.

Effects of the preoperative IRP values on the pathophysiology of patients with esophageal achalasia and on the treatment outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery.

PURPOSE: One diagnostic criterion of esophageal achalasia is that the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) measured by high-resolution manometry (HRM) is at least 15 mmHg. Moreover, while the standard surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia is laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD), there have been insufficient investigations concerning the surgical outcomes from the perspective of the preoperative IRP value. METHODS: We split 121 cases in which LHD was performed as an initial treatment on patients with esophageal achalasia, into two categories according to the IRP median value, and performed a comparative investigation of the surgical outcomes with regard to the preoperative pathophysiology and symptoms. RESULTS: The IRP median value was 29.6 mmHg. The high IRP group consisted of younger individuals and low BMI (p = 0.004 and p = 0.0273, respectively), and the percentage of Chicago classification Type II and III was high (p = 0.029) and the regurgitation score in the preoperative symptoms was high (p = 0.0043). However, no differences in the surgical outcomes were confirmed. CONCLUSION: In patients with esophageal achalasia, the degree of the preoperative IRP value affects the age, BMI, preoperative LESP, and preoperative regurgitation symptoms. However, there were no effects on the surgical outcomes, with the surgical outcomes being satisfactory, regardless of the IRP value.

Giant Hepatic Cyst: A Possible Cause of Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome.

An 80-year-old man was transferred to our institution with lower limb edema and worsening dyspnea following the administration of diuretic medication. Transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography revealed a giant hepatic cyst (176×190 mm) compressing his right atrium and inferior vena cava (IVC). Laparoscopic cyst deroofing combined with omental packing and subsequent tube drainage immediately alleviated all his symptoms. The procedure was uneventful, and he was discharged without any complications on postoperative day 9; he had no recurrent symptoms or hepatic cysts at the postoperative 2-month follow-up. Therefore, a giant hepatic cyst can cause IVC syndrome, and laparoscopic deroofing is a beneficial approach for the treatment of accessible cysts.

Optimal cutoff value of integrated relaxation pressure on the esophagogastric junction to detect outflow obstruction using starlet high-resolution manometry system.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) are idiopathic esophageal motility disorders characterized by impaired deglutitive relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) which represents adequacy of LES relaxation. The Starlet HRM system is widely used in Japan; however, IRP values in achalasia/EGJOO patients assessed with the Starlet system have not been well studied. We propose the optimal cutoff of IRP for detecting achalasia/EGJOO using the Starlet system. METHODS: Patients undergone HRM test using the Starlet system at our institution between July 2018 and September 2020 were included. Of these, we included patients with either achalasia or EGJOO and those who had normal esophageal motility without hiatal hernia. Abnormally impaired LES relaxation (i.e., achalasia and EGJOO) was diagnosed if prolonged esophageal emptying was evident based on timed barium esophagogram (TBE). RESULTS: A total of 111 patients met study criteria. Of these, 48 patients were diagnosed with achalasia (n = 45 [type I, n = 20; type II, n = 22; type III, n = 3]) or EGJOO (n = 3). In the 48 patients who had a prolonged esophageal clearance based on TBE, IRP values distributed along a wide-range of minimal 14.1 to a maximal of 72.2 mmHg. The optimal cutoff value of IRP was 24.7 mmHg with sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 84.1% (AUC 0.94). CONCLUSION: The optimal cutoff value of IRP to distinguish achalasia/EGJOO was ≥ 25 mmHg using the Starlet HRM system in our cohort. This indicates that the current proposed cutoff of 26 mmHg appears to be relevant.

Factors affecting the treatment outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for erosive reflux esophagitis: findings of esophageal pathological function tests.

PURPOSE: To identify the factors that affect laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) treatment efficacy in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (e-GERD) esophagitis, based on the findings of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH) and high-resolution manometry (HRM). METHODS: The subjects were 102 patients with e-GERD diagnosed by endoscopy, who underwent LF as the initial surgery. To analyze the findings of MII-pH and HRM, the patients were divided into two groups: a cured group (CR), comprised of patients whose esophagitis was cured postoperatively; and a recurrence group (RE), comprised of patients who suffered recurrent esophagitis. RESULTS: There were 96 patients in the CR group and 6 in the RE group. MII-pH indicated that the acid reflux time, the longest reflux time, and the number of refluxes longer than 5 min, were significantly higher in the RE group than in the CR group (p = 0.0028, p = 0.0008, p = 0.012, respectively). The HRM indicated that only the distal contractile integral (DCI) was significantly lower in the RE group (p = 0.0109). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that esophageal clearance may affect the treatment outcome of LF. Based on the findings of MII-pH, the longest reflux time and the number of refluxes longer than 5 min were important factors influencing the therapeutic effect, whereas based on the HRM, the DCI value was most important.

Therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for chest pain in patients with achalasia: a single institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain reduces the quality of life of patients with achalasia. Although laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD) is a standard surgical treatment for achalasia, its therapeutic efficacy for chest pain is not clear. The present study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of LHD for chest pain and tried to identify factors associated with the relief of chest pain. METHODS: The study included 244 patients with preoperative chest pain who underwent LHD as the first surgical intervention. The questionnaire-based symptom frequency score was multiplied by the severity score, and the calculated metric was defined as the symptom score. The study population was stratified, by the change in the chest pain symptom score, into Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), and No Remission (NR) groups, which were compared for patient background and surgical outcome. Multivariate analysis was also performed to determine factors associated with the relief of chest pain. RESULTS: As for preoperative clinicopathological conditions, the CR subgroup was older (p = 0.0169) with fewer previous balloon dilatations (p = 0.009). Although no difference was detected in the surgical outcome, the NR group had higher postoperative symptom scores for both difficulty in swallowing and vomiting and a lower score for patient satisfaction with surgery (p = 0.0141). Multivariate analysis detected two factors associated with CR: disease duration over 60 months and less than two previous balloon dilatations. CONCLUSIONS: LHD improved chest pain symptoms in 90% of patients with achalasia. The patients who achieved relief of chest pain were characterized by disease duration over 60 months and less than two previous balloon dilatations.

Surgical results of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease with special reference to recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Surgical results of GERD have mainly been reported from the Western countries, with a few reports found in Japan. We examined the surgical results of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication and clarify the characteristics of recurrent cases. METHODS: The subjects included 375 patients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication from June 1997 to December 2016 as the initial surgery. Patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and surgical results were examined. In addition, we compared the patient characteristics and pathophysiology of recurrent cases in comparison with non-recurrent cases. RESULTS: Age 59 (43-70) and male 211 (56.3%). The operation time was 141 min (113-180) and intraoperative complications were found to have onset in 13 subjects (3.5%). Dysphagia after surgery was found in 18 cases (4.8%). The A factor (the degree of hiatal hernia), P factor (the degree of esophagitis), and pH < 4 holding time significantly improved after surgery compared with prior to surgery (p < 0.001 for all), while the LES lengths and abdominal LES lengths were extended (p < 0.001 for each). Recurrence was found in 48 patients (15.1%) among the 318 patients for whom we could confirm the presence or absence of recurrence. The A factor, P factor, and pH < 4 holding time prior to surgery were, respectively, higher in the recurrence group (p = 0.031, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for GERD could be performed safely, with a response rate as good as 85%. Compared with non-recurrent cases, preoperative clinical conditions such as esophageal hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and acid reflux time were all advanced in recurrent cases.

Effect of preoperative balloon dilation on treatment outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for achalasia: a propensity score matched study.

PURPOSE: There is some debate about whether preoperative balloon dilation influences the outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery (LHD), with no consensus opinion as yet. Thus, we investigated if preoperative dilation influences the treatment outcomes of LHD for achalasia. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 526 patients with achalasia who underwent LHD as an initial treatment between August 1994 and February 2017. The patients were roughly classified by the status of preoperative balloon dilation and matched with propensity scores for age, sex, BMI, morphologic type, and maximum esophageal transverse diameter. Consequently, 94 subjects each were assigned to the balloon dilation (BD) group and to the non-balloon dilation (non-BD) group. We evaluated patient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, and incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis. RESULTS: No differences were found in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of intraoperative mucosal injury, or postoperative hospital stay between the BD and non-BD groups. The mean patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the non-BD group (4.9) than in the BD group (4.7) and the incidence of postoperative esophagitis was significantly lower in the non-BD group (1.1%) than in the BD group (7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative balloon dilation had no effect on intraoperative complications but did increase the incidence of postoperative reflux esophagitis in patients undergoing LHD for achalasia.

Impact of preoperative balloon dilatation on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in young patients with esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Balloon dilatation is reportedly less effective for young patients with esophageal achalasia than for older patients. However, there is no consensus on the impact of prior balloon dilatation on outcomes of surgical treatment. This study investigated the significance of preoperative balloon dilatation on surgical outcomes in young patients with esophageal achalasia. METHODS: Of patients aged less than 40 years who had undergone a laparoscopic Heller-Dor operation for esophageal achalasia, 201 with a postoperative follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. They were divided into two groups with and without a history of balloon dilatation, and compared preoperative pathological conditions and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 100 men and 101 women with a median age of 31 years, of whom 158 patients without a history of pneumatic dilatation (79%, non-PD group) and 43 with a history of pneumatic dilatation (21%, PD group) The preoperative symptom scores for dysphagia and regurgitation were significantly higher in the non-PD group. Although no differences were observed in surgical outcomes or postoperative course, the esophageal clearance rates calculated on preoperative and postoperative timed barium esophagograms were lower in terms of both height and width of the barium column in the PD group than in the non-PD group. Subjectively, both groups expressed equally high satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged less than 40 years with esophageal achalasia, although preoperative balloon dilatation did not affect subjective levels of satisfaction with surgery, postoperative improvement in esophageal clearance in the lower esophagus was inhibited.

Learning curve for laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for achalasia.

PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHD) is widely performed to address achalasia, little is known about the learning curve for this technique. We assessed the learning curve for performing LHD. METHODS: Of the 514 cases with LHD performed between August 1994 and March 2016, the surgical outcomes of 463 cases were evaluated after excluding 50 cases with reduced port surgery and one case with the simultaneous performance of laparoscopic distal partial gastrectomy. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cut-off value for the number of surgical experiences necessary to become proficient with LHD, which was defined as the completion of the learning curve. RESULTS: We defined the completion of the learning curve when the following 3 conditions were satisfied. 1) The operation time was less than 165 minutes. 2) There was no blood loss. 3) There was no intraoperative complication. In order to establish the appropriate number of surgical experiences required to complete the learning curve, the cut-off value was evaluated by using a ROC curve (AUC 0.717, p < 0.001). Finally, we identified the cut-off value as 16 surgical cases (sensitivity 0.706, specificity 0.646). CONCLUSION: Learning curve seems to complete after performing 16 cases.

Impact of esophageal flexion level on the surgical outcome in patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia.

PURPOSE: Esophageal achalasia can be roughly divided into non-sigmoid and sigmoid types. Laparoscopic surgery has been reported to be less than optimally effective for sigmoid type. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the esophageal flexion level on the clinical condition and surgical outcomes of patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia. METHODS: The subjects were 36 patients with sigmoid esophageal achalasia who had been observed for >1 year after surgery. The subjects were divided into sigmoid type (Sg) and advanced sigmoid type (aSg) groups based on the flexion level of the lower esophagus to compare their clinical parameters and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The Sg and aSg groups included 26 (72%) and 10 subjects, respectively. There were no marked differences in the clinical parameters or surgical outcomes between the two groups. However, the clearance rate calculated using the timed barium esophagogram was lower in the aSg group than in the Sg group. No differences were found in the postoperative symptom scores between the two groups, and both reported a high level of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic surgery for symptoms of sigmoid esophageal achalasia was highly successful regardless of the flexion level, the improvement in esophageal clearance was lower when the flexion level was higher.

Early postoperative endoscopy for targeted management of patients at risks of anastomotic complications after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative endoscopy after esophagectomy is assumed to be effective in detection and prediction of anastomotic complications, but overall effects of early postoperative endoscopy remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether mucosal status assessed by early postoperative endoscopy could offer an approach to individualized management after esophagectomy. METHODS: Endoscopy was performed in 176 of 214 patients who underwent esophagectomy at either 1 week or 2 weeks postoperatively. Mucosal damage in the proximal region of the graft was classified as follows: intact mucosa, mild mucosal degeneration, and severe mucosal degeneration. We examined the association of the severity of mucosal damage and the incidence of anastomotic complications. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (16%) developed anastomotic stricture. Symptomatic anastomotic leaks occurred in 15 patients (8.5%), including 6 with stricture. The frequency of intact mucosa, mild mucosal degeneration, and severe mucosal was 7%, 20%, and 73% for leaks; 4%, 11%, and 85% for strictures; and 28%, 62%, and 10% for no complications, respectively (P <.001). Asymptomatic leaks were found in 4 patients in the 1-week endoscopy group. Sensitivity and specificity for the development of stricture in 1-week/2-week were 0.88/0.83 and 0.85/0.98, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 0.52/0.91 and 0.97/0.96, respectively. Early postoperative endoscopy could be carried out without any adverse events in all patients. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the anastomosis and graft with early postoperative endoscopy was safe and resulted in a high predictive value for subsequent anastomotic complications. Early postoperative endoscopy may lead to targeted management for a subset of patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Gender differences in both the pathology and surgical outcome of patients with esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal achalasia is a relatively rare disease that occurs usually in middle-aged patients. The laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD) procedure is the gold-standard surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. There are many studies on the pathology and surgical outcome of esophageal achalasia from various perspectives, but there are no studies on gender differences in both the pathology and surgical outcome. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate gender differences in the surgical outcome with the LHD procedure and in the pathology of esophageal achalasia patients. METHODS: The study included 474 LHD-treated patients who were postoperatively followed up for 6 months or more. The patients were divided into 2 groups by gender, to compare the preoperative pathology, surgical outcome, symptom scores before and after LHD, symptom score improvement frequency, and patient satisfaction with the surgery. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 248 male and 226 female, having a mean age of 45.1 years. There were no gender differences in the preoperative pathology, but a significantly lower BMI (p < 0.0001) and a smaller esophageal dilation (p = 0.0061) were observed in the female group. The frequency and severity of chest pain before the surgery were significantly higher in the female group (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0103, respectively), and the improvement in both the frequency and severity of chest pain was significantly higher in the female group (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.003, respectively). No differences were identified in the surgical outcomes and postoperative course. The patient satisfaction with the surgery was high in both groups and comparable (p = 0.6863). CONCLUSIONS: The female patients with esophageal achalasia were characterized by low BMI, less esophageal dilation, and increased frequency and severity of chest pain. LHD improved the chest pain in the female patients, whereas the surgical outcome and satisfaction with the surgery were excellent regardless of gender.