Unexplained Progressive Neurological Deficits after Corpus Callosotomy May Be Caused by Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Case of Suspected Postoperative Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis.

The main causes of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis are ovarian teratoma and herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis. We present a rare case of suspected anti-NMDAR encephalitis caused by corpus callosotomy (CC). An 18-year-old woman with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome underwent CC. Although left hemiplegic due to cerebral hemorrhage and impaired consciousness due to cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) appeared postoperatively, anticoagulant therapy quickly improved CVST and impaired consciousness. However, various unexplained symptoms such as insomnia, hallucination, impulsivity, impaired consciousness, and a new type of drug-resistant cluster seizures gradually developed over a 2-month period. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed the gradual extension of a hyperintense area from the right frontal lobe on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse was initiated from postoperative day (POD) 74, followed by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, although white blood cell counts were normal in all three cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examinations. After IVIg therapy, the above unexplained symptoms promptly improved. On POD 103, antibodies against NMDAR were revealed in both the serum and CSF collected before these immunotherapies. The patient was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital due to residual left hemiplegia. Psychiatric symptoms and a new onset of drug-resistant seizures may be suggestive of postoperative anti-NMDAR encephalitis, even if CSF findings are mild.

Perampanel monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy: Clinical trial and real-world evidence.

Perampanel, a selective, non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist, is a once-daily oral anti-seizure medication (ASM) for focal-onset seizures (FOS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). In the US, perampanel is approved for the treatment of FOS (adjunctive and monotherapy), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), in patients aged ≥4 years, and as adjunctive treatment of GTCS in patients aged ≥12 years. The monotherapy approvals in the US were based on the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) policy allowing extrapolation of adjunctive data to the monotherapy setting in the absence of randomized controlled monotherapy trials; since then, perampanel monotherapy has received approvals in approximately 48 countries. As there are key differences in clinical evidence of perampanel as adjunctive therapy vs monotherapy, we review the clinical outcomes of perampanel when administered as primary or secondary monotherapy. Eight publications reporting the efficacy and safety outcomes of perampanel monotherapy in clinical trial and real-world settings were selected during our literature search and are included; these comprise three Eisai-sponsored studies in patients with epilepsy: one prospective, open-label, Phase III clinical trial of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy (Study 342 [FREEDOM]) and two retrospective, real-world Phase IV studies of patients with epilepsy who received perampanel during routine clinical care (Studies 504 and 506 [PROVE]); and five retrospective, real-world studies in patients with epilepsy who were prescribed perampanel during routine clinical care. Results from these studies demonstrated that seizure freedom may be achieved following treatment with perampanel monotherapy (either primary or secondary), with favorable retention rates and safety profiles. Overall, the clinical evidence supports the use of perampanel monotherapy both in newly diagnosed patients and in those who have been unable to control their seizures with other ASMs.

[Clinical Application of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation].

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) refers to stimulation of the vagus nerve through the skin of the left cymba conchae and is a unique strategy that is investigated as a useful therapeutic approach for a variety of conditions including epilepsy, depression, cardiac diseases, tinnitus, and migraine. A randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Although several pilot studies were performed before this trial and showed that taVNS was safe, well tolerated, and feasible for long-term treatment, no statistically significant difference was observed between the high- and low-stimulation groups, and further studies are warranted to gain a deeper understanding of this subject. A tingling sensation or pain at the site of stimulation is the most common adverse effect associated with taVNS. Therefore, intermittent stimulation, ranging from 30 minutes to several hours, is provided during each session several times a day. Currently, taVNS is not approved for insurance coverage by the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Further studies and investigations are necessary in the near future.

Perampanel for the treatment of patients with myoclonic seizures in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of perampanel (PER) in treating myoclonic seizures in clinical practice, using data from the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study. METHODS: PERMIT was a pooled analysis of 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which patients with focal and generalised epilepsy were treated with PER. This post-hoc analysis included patients with myoclonic seizures at baseline. Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months; effectiveness was additionally assessed at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit). Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. RESULTS: 156 patients had myoclonic seizures (59.0% female; mean age, 32.1 years; idiopathic generalised epilepsy, 89.1%; Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy, 63.1%; monthly median myoclonic seizure frequency [interquartile range], 1.7 [1.0-10.0]; mean [standard deviation] prior antiseizure medications, 2.9 [2.6]). Retention was assessed for 133 patients (mean time, 12.1 months), effectiveness for 142, and safety/tolerability for 156. Responder and seizure freedom rates were, respectively, 89.5% and 68.8% at 12 months, and 85.9% and 63.4% at the last visit. Incidence of AEs was 46.8%, the most frequent being dizziness/vertigo (19.2%), irritability (18.6%) and somnolence (9.6%). AEs led to discontinuation of 14.0% of patients over 12 months. CONCLUSION: PER was associated with reduction in myoclonic seizure frequency in patients with myoclonic seizures treated in everyday clinical practice.

Omitting Hyperventilation in Electroencephalogram during the COVID-19 Pandemic May Reduce Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Patients with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: To prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), hyperventilation (HV) activation has been avoided in electroencephalograms (EEGs) since April 2020. The influence of omitting HV in EEG on epilepsy diagnosis remains uncertain for patients with epilepsies other than child absence epilepsy. We hypothesized that EEGs with HV would show more interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) than EEGs without HV in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: We reviewed the EEGs of seizure-free patients with JME who underwent EEG, both with and without HV, from January 2019 to October 2021, in our institution, and compared IEDs between EEG with and without HV. RESULTS: This study analyzed 23 JME patients. The IED-positive rate was significantly higher in EEG with HV (65.2%) than in EEG without HV (34.8%, p = 0.016). The mean ± standard deviation number of IEDs per minute was significantly larger during HV (1.61 ± 2.25 × 10-1) than during non-activation of both first EEG (0.57 ± 0.93 × 10-1, p = 0.039) and second EEG (0.39 ± 0.76 × 10-1, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In JME patients, performing HV during EEG may increase IEDs and appears to facilitate the accurate diagnosis of epilepsy.

Experience of perampanel monotherapy beyond initial titration to achieve seizure freedom in patients with focal-onset seizures with newly diagnosed or currently untreated recurrent epilepsy: A post hoc analysis of the open-label Study 342 (FREEDOM).

OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis evaluated whether continued treatment with perampanel monotherapy beyond initial titration may be appropriate for patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with currently untreated epilepsy to achieve seizure freedom with an effective dose. METHODS: Study 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single-arm, open-label, Phase III study of perampanel monotherapy. Patients aged ≥12 years with untreated FOS received perampanel 4 mg/d in a 32-week Treatment Phase (6-week Titration and 26-week Maintenance Periods); in case of seizure(s) during Maintenance Period, patients could enter a 30-week Treatment Phase (4-week Titration and 26-week Maintenance Periods) to be up-titrated to perampanel 8 mg/d. The primary endpoint was seizure-freedom rate during Maintenance Period in the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Analysis Set (patients who had ≥1 post-dose efficacy measurement during Maintenance Period); safety was monitored. This analysis of 4-mg/d efficacy data assessed the proportion of patients achieving seizure freedom during the Maintenance Period (responders) relative to patients with an early/later response (depending on seizure status during the Titration Period). RESULTS: In the mITT population (n = 73), 46 patients were 4-mg/d responders; of whom, 37 (80.4%) were early responders and nine (19.6%) were later responders. The mean (standard deviation) percent reductions in FOS frequency from baseline at the end of the 4-mg/d Titration Period were 100.0% (0.0%; early responders) and 46.3% (97.3%; later responders). Among the 27 4-mg/d nonresponders, nine (33.3%) patients who had an early response experienced seizure(s) during the subsequent 4-mg/d Maintenance Period. Safety outcomes were similar, regardless of responder status, without new safety concerns. SIGNIFICANCE: Some patients with untreated FOS may benefit from continued treatment beyond initial titration of perampanel monotherapy to achieve seizure freedom, suggesting that it may not be appropriate to make treatment decisions to discontinue or switch from perampanel monotherapy solely based on seizure response before an effective dose has been reached.

Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation following Corpus Callosotomy for Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for residual seizures after corpus callosotomy (CC) has not yet been fully investigated. We hypothesized that seizure control would be improved by VNS after CC. The purpose of this study was to compare seizure frequency between patients with implantation of a VNS generator (post-VNS group) or without VNS (non-post-VNS group) following CC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CC between January 2009 and May 2019 in our institution. We evaluated proportions of ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) and seizure reduction rate 1 and 2 years after VNS. To investigate factors related to responders, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed regarding age, number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), addition of novel ASMs (levetiracetam, lacosamide or perampanel), and post-VNS or non-post-VNS status. RESULTS: Thirteen post-VNS patients and 24 non-post-VNS patients were analyzed in this study. Responder rate at 1 year after VNS differed significantly between the post-VNS group (53.9%) and non-post-VNS group (12.5%, p = 0.017). Number of ASMs at the time of CC and post-VNS were significantly associated with responders in univariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.88, p = 0.025 and OR 8.2, 95%CI 1.6-41.6, p = 0.011, respectively), whereas age, sex, seizure frequency, and addition of novel ASMs were not. In multivariate analysis, the presence of VNS procedures after CC was the only factor favorably associated with responder status (OR 82.2, 95%CI 1.55-4355.7, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: VNS therapy after CC may increase the proportion of responders independent of the addition of novel ASMs.

Current Status and Future Objectives of Surgical Therapies for Epilepsy in Japan.

This study investigated the number of epilepsy surgeries performed over time in Japan, and conducted a questionnaire survey of the Japan Neurosurgical Society (JNS) training program core hospitals to determine the current status and future objectives of surgical therapies and epilepsy training programs for physicians in Japan. This article presents part of a presentation delivered as a presidential address at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Epilepsy Surgery Society of Japan held in January 2021. The number of epilepsy surgeries performed per year has increased in Japan since 2011 to around 1,200 annually between 2015 and 2018. The questionnaire survey showed that 50% of the responding hospitals performed epilepsy surgery and 29% had an epilepsy center, and that these hospitals provided senior residents with education regarding epilepsy surgery. The presence of an epilepsy center in a hospital was positively correlated with the availability of long-term video electroencephalography monitoring beds as well as the number of epilepsy surgeries performed at the hospital. In regions with no medical facilities offering specialized surgical therapies for epilepsy, the JNS training program core hospitals may help improve epilepsy diagnosis and treatment. They may also increase the number of safe and effective surgeries by establishing epilepsy centers that can perform long-term video electroencephalography monitoring, providing junior neurosurgeons with training regarding epilepsy, and playing a core role in surgical therapies for epilepsy in tertiary medical areas in close cooperation with neighboring medical facilities.

Optimal Use of Perampanel in Asian Patients with Epilepsy: Expert Opinion.

Perampanel is a once-daily, first-in-class AMPA receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of epilepsy and exhibits broad-spectrum efficacy in a range of seizure types when used as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. Clinical studies and real-world evidence have demonstrated the advantages of initiating perampanel at low doses and utilizing a slow titration strategy. Initiating perampanel at an early stage has also been shown to be associated with better patient outcomes. However, the optimal use and place of perampanel in clinical practice has not yet been clearly defined for the Asian patient population. Use of perampanel in clinical practice varies markedly across the Asia region because of variation in knowledge, attitudes, and practice. There is currently no specific guidance on best practices for prescribing perampanel in Asian patients or how to optimize treatment strategies to maximize adherence. A group of epilepsy experts attended a virtual meeting in September 2020 to discuss their experience with using perampanel in the Asian practice setting, including their views regarding appropriate patient populations, optimal starting and maintenance doses, optimal titration regimens, key barriers to adherence, and prevention and management of adverse events. This article summarizes key clinical and real-world evidence for perampanel and consolidates the experts' opinions on optimization of perampanel prescribing and adherence in real-world practice, providing practical strategies for clinicians to implement to improve outcomes for people with epilepsy in Asia.

Freedom From Seizures Might Be Key to Continuing Occupation After Epilepsy Surgery.

Introduction: We hypothesized that epilepsy surgery for adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who obtained freedom from seizures could provide opportunities for these patients to continue their occupation, and investigated continuity of occupation to test this postulation. Methods: Data were obtained from patients who had undergone resective surgery for medically intractable TLE between October 2009 and April 2019 in our hospital. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ≥16 years old at surgery; (2) post-operative follow-up ≥12 months; (3) seizure-free period ≥12 months. As a primary outcome, we evaluated employment status before and after surgery, classified into three categories as follows: Level 0, no job; Level 1, students or homemakers (financially supported by a family member); and Level 2, working. Neuropsychological status was also evaluated as a secondary outcome. Results: Fifty-one (87.9%) of the 58 enrolled TLE patients who obtained freedom from seizures after surgery continued working as before or obtained a new job (employment status: Level 2). A significant difference in employment status was identified between before and after surgery (p = 0.007; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) were evaluated for neuropsychological status both before and after surgery. Significant differences in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III scores were identified between before and after surgery (p < 0.05 each; paired t-test). Conclusion: Seizure freedom could be a factor that facilitates job continuity, although additional data are needed to confirm that possibility. Further investigation of job continuity after epilepsy surgery warrants an international, multicenter study.

Responsive Neurostimulation as a Novel Palliative Option in Epilepsy Surgery.

Patients with drug-resistant focal onset epilepsy are not always suitable candidates for resective surgery, a definitive intervention to control their seizures. The alternative surgical treatment for these patients in Japan has been vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). Besides VNS, epileptologists in the United States can choose a novel palliative option called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop neuromodulation system approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2013. The RNS System continuously monitors neural electroencephalography (EEG) activity at the possible seizure onset zone (SOZ) where electrodes are placed and responds with electrical stimulation when a pre-defined epileptic activity is detected. The controlled clinical trials in the United States have demonstrated long-term utility and safety of the RNS System. Seizure reduction rates have continued to improve over time, reaching 75% over 9 years of treatment. The incidence of implant-site infection, the most frequent device-related adverse event, is similar to those of other neuromodulation devices. The RNS System has shown favorable efficacy for both mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and neocortical epilepsy of the eloquent cortex. Another unique advantage of the RNS System is its ability to provide chronic monitoring of ambulatory electrocorticography (ECoG). Valuable information obtained from ECoG monitoring provides a better understanding of the state of epilepsy in each patient and improves clinical management. This article reviews the developmental history, structure, and clinical utility of the RNS System, and discusses its indications as a novel palliative option for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Recent Advancement of Technologies and the Transition to New Concepts in Epilepsy Surgery.

Fruitful progress and change have been accomplished in epilepsy surgery as science and technology advance. Stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) was originally developed by Talairach and Bancaud at Hôspital Sainte-Anne in the middle of the 20th century. SEEG has survived, and is now being recognized once again, especially with the development of neurosurgical robots. Many epilepsy centers have already replaced invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes (SDEs) by SEEG with depth electrodes worldwide. SEEG has advantages in terms of complication rates as shown in the previous reports. However, it would be more indispensable to demonstrate how much SEEG has contributed to improving seizure outcomes in epilepsy surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been an only implantable device since 1990s, and has obtained the autostimulation mode which responds to ictal tachycardia. In addition to VNS, responsive neurostimulator (RNS) joined in the options of palliative treatment for medically refractory epilepsy. RNS is winning popularity in the United States because the device has abilities of both neurostimulation and recording of ambulatory electrocorticography (ECoG). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has also attained approval as an adjunctive therapy in Europe and the United States. Ablative procedures such as SEEG-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) have been developed as less invasive options in epilepsy surgery. There will be more alternatives and tools in this field than ever before. Consequently, we will need to define benefits, indications, and limitations of these new technologies and concepts while adjusting ourselves to a period of fundamental transition in our foreseeable future.

Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with focal-onset seizures with newly diagnosed epilepsy or recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission: The open-label Study 342 (FREEDOM Study).

OBJECTIVE: Our study assessed perampanel monotherapy in patients (aged ≥12 years) with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) in Japan and South Korea. METHODS: Study 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single-arm, open-label, Phase III study. Patients initially received perampanel in a 32-week 4-mg/d Treatment Phase (6-week Titration; 26-week Maintenance Periods). If they experienced a seizure during the 4-mg/d Maintenance Period, they could be up-titrated to 8 mg/d across an additional 30-week Treatment Phase (4-week Titration; 26-week Maintenance Periods). Primary endpoint was the seizure-freedom rate during the Maintenance Period (4 mg/d and last evaluated dose [4 or 8 mg/d]). Secondary endpoints included time to first seizure onset and to withdrawal during Maintenance. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. RESULTS: At data cutoff (February 28, 2019), 89 patients with FOS (84 [94.4%] with newly diagnosed epilepsy and 5 [5.6%] with recurrence of epilepsy after a period of remission) had received ≥1 perampanel dose; 16 patients discontinued during the 4-mg/d Titration Period, meaning 73 patients entered the 4-mg/d Maintenance Period and were included in the primary analysis set for efficacy. Seizure-freedom rate in the 26-week Maintenance Period was 46/73 (63.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.9-74.0) at 4 mg/d and 54/73 (74.0%; 95% CI: 62.4-83.5) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Cumulative probability of seizure-onset and withdrawal rates during Maintenance was 30.8% (95% CI: 21.5-43.0) and 23.7% (95% CI: 15.4-35.3) at 4 mg/d, and 18.2% (95% CI: 11.0-29.3) and 23.3% (95% CI: 15.2-34.8) at 4 or 8 mg/d. Perampanel was generally well tolerated, and the most common TEAE was dizziness. SIGNIFICANCE: Perampanel monotherapy (4 to 8 mg/d) was efficacious and consistent with the known safety profile up to 26 weeks in patients (≥12 years) with primarily newly diagnosed FOS with or without FBTCS.

Additional seizure reduction by replacement with Vagus Nerve Stimulation Model 106 (AspireSR).

AspireSR is a novel vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) device which detects ictal heart rate changes and automatically apply additional stimulus. We investigated the difference of the efficacy between AspireSR and preceding VNS models in patients with device replacement. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 17 patients whose VNS devices were changed because of battery discharge. The rates of seizure reduction, the number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used and device parameters between the two devices were evaluated. AspireSR improved significantly the rates of seizure reduction of the patients. Four patients out of 11 patients with low response to the preceding VNS models (no change or <50 % reduction) achieved>50 % seizure reduction. The AEDs used were not different in the observed periods. The device parameters were low setting in AspireSR compared to preceding VNS models. AspireSR decrease significantly seizure frequencies compared to the preceding VNS models. Change of the devices to AspireSR at the time of battery empty could be recommendable.

Investigation of the effects of electromagnetic field treatment of hot spring water for scale inhibition using a fibre optic sensor.

Treatment with an electromagnetic field, one of the potential techniques to inhibit scale deposition from water, has the advantage of not requiring the addition of any chemicals. Field tests using a fibre optic sensor were conducted to evaluate the effect that the treatment of hot spring water in Matsushiro, Japan with an electromagnetic field had on calcium carbonate scale formation. The optical response to scale deposition recorded by the fibre optic sensor decreased as a consequence of the application of an electromagnetic field, and the effectiveness of scale formation inhibition depended on the frequency of the electromagnetic field. This evidence was compared with results from changes in scale mass measured using the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) method. Mass increases of the scale formed on the quartz crystal surface in hot spring water were inhibited by electromagnetic field treatment. These results were verified performing a column flow test, whereby the flow rate of hot spring water through a column was measured.

Vagus nerve stimulation in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus - A systematic review.

RATIONALE: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is the persistence of status epilepticus despite second-line treatment. Super-refractory SE (SRSE) is characterized by ongoing status despite 48 h of anaesthetic treatment. Due to the high case fatality in RSE of 16-39%, off label treatments without strong evidence of efficacy in RSE are often administered. In single case-reports and small case series totalling 28 patients, acute implantation of VNS in RSE was associated with 76% and 26% success rate in generalized and focal RSE respectively. We performed an updated systematic review of the literature on efficacy of VNS in RSE/SRSE by including all reported patients. METHODS: We systematically searched EMBASE, CENTRAL, Opengre.eu, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and PubMed databases to identify studies reporting the use of VNS for RSE and/or SRSE. We also searched conference abstracts from AES and ILAE meetings. RESULTS: 45 patients were identified in total of which 38 were acute implantations of VNS in RSE/SRSE. Five cases had VNS implantation for epilepsia partialis continua, one for refractory electrical status epilepticus in sleep and one for acute encephalitis with refractory repetitive focal seizures. Acute VNS implantation was associated with cessation of RSE/SRSE in 74% (28/38) of acute cases. Cessation did not occur in 18% (7/38) of cases and four deaths were reported (11%); all of them due to the underlying disease and unlikely related to VNS implantation. Median duration of the RSE/SRSE episode pre and post VNS implantation was 18 days (range: 3-1680 days) and 8 days (range: 3-84 days) respectively. Positive outcomes occurred in 82% (31/38) of cases. CONCLUSION: VNS can interrupt RSE and SRSE in 74% of patients; data originate from reported studies classified as level IV and the risk for reporting bias is high. Further prospective studies are warranted to investigate acute VNS in RSE and SRSE.

Seizure frequency can be reduced by changing intracranial pressure: A case report in drug-resistant epilepsy.

A relationship between seizures and intracranial pressure (ICP) has been proposed, but not clearly identified. Whether changes in ICP can evoke seizures remains controversial. We report the case of a 23-year-old man who had undergone shunt surgery in childhood and later presented with focal impaired awareness seizures and behavior arrest. Seizures were uncontrolled despite 3 years of pharmacotherapy, but suddenly stopped after shunt removal. Our case supports the hypothesis that drug-resistant epilepsy can be influenced by changes in ICP. In particular, this case indicates that elevations in ICP may help reduce some seizures.

Simultaneous Multiselective Spectroelectrochemical Fiber-Optic Sensor: Sensing with an Optically Transparent Electrode.

We present a spectroelectrochemical fiber-optic sensor with an optically transparent electrode. The sensor was fabricated by coating indium tin oxide (ITO) onto the surface of fiber-optic core chips using a polygonal barrel-sputtering method. The ITO-coated fiber-optic probe can be simply and cheaply mass-produced and used as a disposable probe. The sensing is based on changes in an attenuated total reflection signal accompanying the electrochemical oxidation-reduction of an analyte at the electrode. The properties of an ITO-coated fiber-optic probe as an optically transparent electrode were investigated for varying thicknesses of ITO. The sensor responses were successfully enhanced with an additional level of selectivity via an electrostatically adsorbed, self-assembled monolayer, which comprised a polyanion and polycation.