Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Augment Altern Commun ; 27(1): 53-60, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21355811

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether participants with intellectual impairments could benefit from the movement associated with animated pictures while they were learning symbol names. Sixteen school students, whose linguistic-developmental age ranged from 38?91 months, participated in the experiment. They were taught 16 static visual symbols and the corresponding action words (naming task) in two sessions conducted one week apart. In the experimental condition, animation was employed to facilitate comprehension, whereas no animation was used in the control condition. Enhancement of learning was shown in the experimental condition, suggesting that the participants benefited from animated symbols. Furthermore, it was found that the lower the linguistic developmental age, the more effective the animated cue was in learning static visual symbols.


Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Disabled Children/rehabilitation , Education of Intellectually Disabled/methods , Intellectual Disability/rehabilitation , Semantics , Adolescent , Asian People , Child , Disabled Children/psychology , Humans , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Motor Skills Disorders/psychology , Motor Skills Disorders/rehabilitation , Photic Stimulation , Symbolism
2.
Cogn Psychol ; 55(2): 136-68, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17070794

ABSTRACT

This study examined whether singular/plural marking in a language helps children learn the meanings of the words 'one,' 'two,' and 'three.' First, CHILDES data in English, Russian (which marks singular/plural), and Japanese (which does not) were compared for frequency, variability, and contexts of number-word use. Then young children in the USA, Russia, and Japan were tested on Counting and Give-N tasks. More English and Russian learners knew the meaning of each number word than Japanese learners, regardless of whether singular/plural cues appeared in the task itself (e.g., "Give two apples" vs. "Give two"). These results suggest that the learning of "one," "two" and "three" is supported by the conceptual framework of grammatical number, rather than that of integers.


Subject(s)
Language , Mathematics , Semantics , Vocabulary , Child , Child, Preschool , Concept Formation , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Humans , Japan , Russia , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...