Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Invest ; 62(3-4): 188-94, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26399346

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed for 6 periampullary cancer patients by using methods verified by quality randomized controlled trials (RCT) in a low-volume center (LVC). The purpose of this study was to verify the clinical results. METHODS: No-touch pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy (PrPD), antecolic gastrojejunostomy, pancreatico-jejunostomy with a lost stent tube to the main pancreatic duct, and early removal of a prophylactic drain were performed. RESULTS: The drain could be removed 4 days after operation, and no pancreatic fistula was observed in all cases. Solid food could be started on POD4 after removing the drain. Furthermore, postoperative systemic chemotherapy could be started earlier. CONCLUSION: Although we have only a few PD cases a year in our institution, PD can be conducted safely without complications by using the methods verified by quality RCTs.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Pylorus/surgery , Adult , Aged , Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
J Med Invest ; 60(3-4): 249-55, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24190043

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to verify the outcome of the emergency one stage resection and anastomosis procedure for patients with obstructed colorectal cancer. METHODS: An emergency one stage resection and anastomosis procedure was performed for 40 patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. The outcome was verified and compared dividing into two groups. 17 patients under the age of 70 in (Group A), 23 patients 70 years and over in (Group B). RESULTS: The operative mortality rate in both groups was 0%. As a result, postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. The overall survival rate after a 5-year period in both groups was 41.8%, regarding all patients and the survival curves for the two groups, was not significantly different. The 5 year survival rate in stage II or III showed no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The one-stage resection and anastomosis of the large bowel could be applied safely to emergency patients, which in turn allows for excellent short-term operative results in both groups mentioned. This particular procedure should be positively enforced, even in elderly patients in their 70's.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colectomy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Emergencies , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/mortality , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...