Adjacent lobe invasion of T2 tumor in non-small cell lung cancer has T3 disease-like survival fissure invasion: T2 or T3?

Controversy still exists regarding the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with adjacent lobe invasion (T-ALI) according to the TNM system in terms of T factor and the appropriate surgical resection method. We performed an analysis to compare the prognosis of T-ALI with T2 and T3 disease and to see the effect of our surgical method for these tumors. Two hundred consecutive patients between January 2012 and November 2020, with anatomical lobectomy for T2 or T3 tumor (Group-1) and non-anatomical lobectomy resection (lobectomy plus wedge resection [LWR]) (Group-2) for T-ALI (T2-ALI and T3-ALI) due to primary NSCLC, who did not have lymph node metastases were analyzed retrospectively. All surgeries were performed by two experienced surgeons who adopted the same surgical technique. Those who underwent additional segmentectomy and bilobectomy due to fissure invasion were excluded from the study. Overall survival rates of all patients were determined and factors affecting survival were evaluated by performing univariate and multivariate analyses. Of the patients with a mean age of 62.2 ± 7.8 years, 175 (87.5%) were male and 25 (12.5%) were female. There were 137 (68.5%) patients in Group 1 and 63 (31.5%) patients in Group 2. The mean tumor size in Group 1 (4.4 ± 1.4 cm) was significantly smaller than that in Group 2 (4.9 ± 1.4 cm) (p = 0.014). When T distribution within the groups was considered, the rate of pathological T3 in Group 1 (33.6%) was significantly lower than that in Group 2 (55.6%) (p = 0.005). While the 5-year overall survival rate was 70.1% in Group 1, it was 50.6% in Group 2 (p = 0.022). When tumors were grouped as T2, T2-ALI, T3, and T3-ALI according to T factor, the 5-year overall survival rates were 71.4% and 67.8% in T2 and T3 tumors, respectively, and 49.2% and 51.5% in T2-ALI and T3-ALI tumors, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of these four groups, the overall survival rates for T2-ALI and T3-ALI were significantly lower than those of T2 tumors (p = 0.046 and p = 0.025, respectively). In the analysis made between the T2 tumor group and the new T3 group (T2-ALI, T3, T3-ALI), which was formed by upgrading T2-ALI tumors to the T3 group, T2 tumors were found to have a significantly better survival rate (p = 0.019). The disease-free survival of pT2 patients and new T3 group patients was statistically significant, 63.7% and 45.7%, respectively (p = 0.050). Our results suggest that LWR for T-ALI can be performed with acceptable oncologic outcomes when compared to anatomical lobectomy. T2-ALI has a worse overall survival than T2 tumor and offers a similar prognosis to T3. Given this situation, it is more appropriate to classify T2-ALI as T3. Further studies based on larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Effect of the pandemic on surgical procedures in a tertiary care hospital: A retrospective review.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of performing surgeries with necessary precautions and to evaluate demographic characteristics of operated patients during novel coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the infection rates during hospitalization and within 14 days after surgery. Material and Methods: Between March 15th, 2020 and April 30th, 2020, a total of 639 patients who had been operated on in our center were retrospectively analyzed. According to the triage system, the surgical procedures were classified as emergency, time-sensitive, and elective procedures. Data including age, sex, indication for surgery, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, pre- and postoperative symptoms, the presence and/ or absence of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test result, type of surgery, surgical site, and documented COVID-19 infections during hospitalization and within 21 days after surgery were recorded. Results: Of the patients, 60.4% were males and 39.6% were females with a mean age of 43.08 ± 22.68 years. Malignancy was the most common indication for surgery (35.5%), followed by trauma (29.1%). The abdominal area and head and neck region were the most frequent surgical sites in 27.4% and 24.9% of the patients, respectively. Of all surgical procedures, 54.9% were emergency and 43.9% were time-sensitive procedures. Of the patients, 84.2% were in ASA Class I-II while 15.8% patients were in ASA Class III, IV and V. General anesthesia was the most common anesthesia type in 83.9% of the patients. The overall rate of COVID-19 infection was 0.63% in the preoperative period. The rate of COVID-19 infection during and after surgery was 0.31%. Conclusion: With similar infection rates to the general population, surgeries of all types can be performed safely taking preventive measures in the preand postoperative period. It would be wise to perform surgical treatment without delay in patients with an increased risk for mortality and morbidity in accordance with strict infection control principles.

A Word of Caution for Gossypiboma.

Gossypiboma, a retained nonabsorbable surgical sponge, is a major safety issue despite being infrequent, causing serious malpractice debates. In addition to this, it may mimic a range different disease within the thorax and even have unpleasant clinical presentations even after years.In this article, we report four gossypiboma cases with nonspecific clinical presentations to emphasize the importance of keeping this diagnosis in mind with all patients who have had a previous operation.

Oxygen reserve index guided oxygen titration in one lung ventilation with low fresh gas flow

Background/aim: Continuous oxygen reserve index (ORI) measurement with multiple wave pulse co-oximetry is a noninvasive measurement. The decrease in the ORI trend provides a prediction for the development of hypoxemia and provides info rmation on hyperoxia. Our aim is to determine the effect of ORI-guided oxygen titration on hyperoxemia-mediated morbidity. Materials and methods: Consecutive 120 ASA I-III patients, 18­70 years of age, without severe obstruction or restriction, undergoing one lung ventilation (OLV), were included in the study. Patients were divided into 4 groups. Oxygen titration without ORI monitoring with low-flow anesthesia (1 L/min, Group 1, n = 25) and high-flow anesthesia (4 L/min, Group 2, n = 28). Oxygen titration by ORI monitoring with low flow anesthesia (1 L/min, Group 3, n = 25) and high flow anesthesia (4 L/min, Group 4, n = 25). FiO2 increased up to 100% if necessary. OLV time, duration of surgery and anesthesia, FiO2 applied during OLV, oxygen application time (T) over 60%, vital signs, hospital and ICU stay time, and complications were recorded. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in terms of FiO2 used during OLV (p < 0.05). There was no difference in ORI values (p < 0.05). In Group 3, both PaO2 and SpO2 were significantly lower than the others both before and during OLV. There was no significant difference in terms of ORI parameters between low flow and high flow anesthesia groups. There was a strong, positive correlation between the duration of hospital stay and FiO2 used above 80% during OLV. Conclusion: We concluded that ORI-guided thoracic anesthesia may reduce hospital stay and increase patient safety.