Advanced Stage Is a Risk for Severe Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Adriamycin/Cyclophosphamide/Docetaxel Chemotherapy.

Background: Severe neutropenia, including febrile neutropenia, is a major toxicity of systemic chemotherapy that leads to delays in treatment, higher costs, and mortality. Severe neutropenia may occur during neoadjuvant chemotherapy even when the patients are free from known risk factors. Pegfilgrastim, a covalent conjugant of filgrastim that stimulate the production of neutrophils, is used for prevention. The current study aimed to reveal the characteristics of patients who need pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis to prevent severe neutropenia, including febrile neutropenia and grade 3 neutropenia, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 83 patients treated with neoadjuvant adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel chemotherapy was performed. The factors which associated with severe neutropenia were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Severe neutropenia developed in one of 22 patients (5%) with pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis and in 17 of 61 patients (28%) without it. In 83 patients, the incidence of severe neutropenia was significantly decreased in the patients with pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis shown by the univariate analysis (P = 0.023) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.030). In 61 patients without pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis, the univariate analysis showed that severe neutropenia was associated with tumor size (P = 0.004), clinical stage (P = 0.009), and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) (P = 0.026). The multivariate analysis showed that clinical stage was associated with severe neutropenia (P = 0.021). Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that advanced stage is a risk for severe neutropenia in patients treated with neoadjuvant adriamycin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel chemotherapy. Given that prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was associated with significantly lower incidence of severe neutropenia, patient with advance stage breast cancer may benefit from pegfilgrastim during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

[A Case of Metachronal Phyllodes Tumors That Presented Bilaterally in the Breast].

A 33-year-old woman underwent resection of a right breast mass, which was diagnosed as a fibroadenoma 15 years ago. Ten years later, a right breast mass appeared again, and it was diagnosed as a fibroadenoma based on core needle biopsy. After observation for a while, the mass increased in size, and she underwent resection of the tumor, which was diagnosed as a borderline-malignant phyllodes tumor. A mass appeared again in the right breast and rapidly expanded. A malignant phyllodes tumor was suspected, and right mastectomy was performed. The pathological diagnosis revealed a benign phyllodes tumor. Four years ago, a left breast mass was also detected. Because the mass was suspected to be a fibroadenoma, it has been observed for a few years. The mass has increased in size since 1 year ago, and another mass emerged 2 months ago. Core needle biopsy of the 2 masses revealed that both were phyllodes tumors. She underwent left mastectomy, and the pathological examination revealed that both masses were benign phyllodes tumors. We report this rare case of metachronal phyllodes tumors that presented bilaterally.

[A Case of Breast Cancer with Metastatic Nodules in Additionally Resected Specimens].

A 68-year-old woman who had leftbreastcancer (cT2N0M0, cStage ⅡA)underwentbreast -conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Pathological diagnosis of the resected specimen revealed a 60mm cancer lesion including a 50 mm invasive ductal carcinoma with surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ, although the pre-operative MRI suggested a 30mm invasive cancer. The surgical margin was positive with the exposure of ductal carcinoma in situ. Additional resection was performed with a resection margin of 20mm from the head-side stump of the previous surgery. Pathological diagnosis of the additionally resected specimen revealed a 6mm invasive carcinoma with its exposure on the surface of the specimen around the new surgical stump distant from the initial surgical margin, where no remnant cancer was noted. She underwent left mastectomy. Pathological diagnosis further revealed 7mm and 2mm invasive carcinomas in the remnant breast. The preoperative imaging was reviewed retrospectively, and it was found that identifying the nodules in the remnant breast was quite difficult based on the images, including MRI. We report a case of breast cancer with metastatic nodules in additionally resected specimens.

[Clinical Experience of a Primary Accessory Breast Cancer Patient].

A 59-year-old woman attended a previous hospital complaining of a nodule of the right axilla. Although ultrasonography had shown no evidenceof malignancy, a growth of thenodulewas found on follow-up. Excisional biopsy revealed a primary accessory breast cancer. Because the resected margins were involved, she was referred to our hospital for additional treatment. Based on imaging, both bilateral mammary glands and axillary lymph nodes were reported normal, and distant metastasis was not observed. We performed additional resection of the right axillary tissue around the biopsy site and the right axillary lymph nodedisse ction. Histo-pathological examination revealed the residual invasive ductal carcinoma in the resected specimen. Both the new surgical margins and the lymph nodes were free of disease. Accessory breast cancer is relatively rare, with the incidence being less than 1% of all breast cancers. It is most frequent in the axillary region. Local extensive resection with sufficient surgical margin and axillary lymph node dissection are generally required. This case report presents our clinical experience of accessory breast cancer with some discussion of the literature.