ABSTRACT
A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the correlation between the integration of high-risk human papillomavirus and disease severity of cervical lesions. 720 liquid-based cytology specimens including 422 normal cytology, 78 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 172 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 48 women with cervical cancers were examined using HPV blot and type-specific E6 PCR. Positive HPV DNA types 16, 18, 52 and 58 were examined for viral DNA using real-time PCR. Expression of E6 transcripts was 89.5% (pure integration), 71.7% (mixed type), and 47.1% (pure episomal) (p<0.0001). Geometric mean levels ranged from 110.6 (episomal form) to 508.4 (mixed form), and 5966.2 (integration form) by real-time PCR (p<0.0001). Geometric mean levels of E6 transcript in HPV 16, 18, 52, and 58 correlated with the severity of cervical lesions and the physical integration state of the viral genome (p<0.0001). We conclude that this is the first paper to point out that integration of high-risk HPVs not only 16 and 18 but also 52 and 58 is correlated with high levels of oncogene transcripts from normal cervix, CIN to cervical cancer.
Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Transcription, Genetic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Virus Integration , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/classification , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Alphapapillomavirus/physiology , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Viral , Humans , Middle Aged , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/metabolism , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Prospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate whether quantitation of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) E6 messenger RNA (mRNA) can be a potential biomarker for detecting the severity of cervical lesions. HPV genotyping was performed using a modified MY11/GP6+ PCR for HPV DNA amplification, followed by HPV genotype-specific hybridization with on a gene chip. E6 type-specific PCR was used to validate multiple infections. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase (QRT-PCR) and real-time PCR used to measure mRNA levels and DNA viral loads of 6 HPV oncogenic types (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 52 and 58) in 720 liquid-based cytology samples. The HPV DNA and RNA measurements were correlated with cervical lesions diagnosed by histopathologic examination. mRNA transcripts in the 6 types HPV DNA-positive cases was lower in normal women and Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/genetics
, Oncogenes
, RNA, Messenger/analysis
, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
, Base Sequence
, Cross-Sectional Studies
, DNA Primers
, Female
, Humans
, Nucleic Acid Hybridization
, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
, Severity of Illness Index
, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
, Viral Load
ABSTRACT
We compared the efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA detection between a PCR-based genechip (Easychip HPV Blot [hereafter referred to as HPV Blot]; King Car, Taiwan) method and Hybrid Capture II (HCII; Digene, Gaithersburg, MD) in women with previous normal (n = 146) or abnormal (> or =atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS] [n = 208]) cytology. A total of 354 cervical swab samples were collected for HPV DNA assay by both HCII and SPF1/GP6+ PCR followed by HPV Blot tests. Colposcopy-directed biopsy was performed if clinically indicated. Of the 354 samples, HPV-positive rates by these two methods (HCII and HPV Blot) were 12.6% and 18.2% in 143 normal samples, 36.2% and 45.7% in 105 ASCUS samples, 57.4% and 57.4% in 94 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion samples, and 83.3% and 75.0% in 12 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion samples, respectively. The concordance of HPV Blot and HCII was 80.8% (286/354), and the agreement between the methods (kappa value, 0.68) was substantial. Discrepancies were further investigated by at least one of the following three methods: direct sequencing, type-specific PCR, and HPV Blot genotyping of cervical biopsy tissue. In the 15 HCII-positive samples, HPV Blot detected only non-HCII HPV genotypes; results of further verification methods were consistent with the latter test in the 15 samples. Of the 20 samples with HCII-negative and HPV Blot-positive results, 18 were found to contain the 13 HCII high-risk genotypes by verification methods. In only 16.7% (3/18) of the HCII-positive but HPV Blot-negative samples, further studies detected the 13 HCII genotypes. We conclude that HPV Blot seemed comparable to HCII for detection of HPV DNA in cervical swab samples.