ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Our study evaluated if rapid inpatient titration of methadone for pregnant patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) improved outcomes without increasing the risk for overdose. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients admitted for inpatient methadone titration from January 2020 to June 2022. Outcomes were compared between standard versus rapid titration protocols. Standard titration involved an initial methadone dose with additional doses every 6 hours if clinical opiate withdrawal score (COWS) is >9. Rapid titration involved an initial methadone dose with additional doses every 4 hours if COWS is >9. The primary outcome was time required to achieve stable dose. Secondary outcomes included elopement prior to achieving stable dose, methadone-related readmission, opioid overdose, and final dose. RESULTS: There were 97 patients in the standard titration (STP) and 97 patients in the rapid titration (RTP) groups. Demographic characteristics and substance use history did not differ between the 2 groups. Time to stable dose did not differ between the 2 groups (RTP, 5.0 days ±4.0; STP, 4.0 days ±3.0; P = 0.08). Patients in the rapid titration group were less likely to elope from the hospital prior to stabilization (RTP 23.0% vs STP 37.9%, P = 0.03) and had fewer methadone-related readmissions (P < 0.001). One patient (1.0%) in the RTP group required naloxone treatment while inpatient for concern for overdose, while none did in the STP group (P = 0.32). There was no difference in median final stable dose between the 2 groups (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid titration of methadone for pregnant patients with OUD was associated with decreased medical elopement and methadone-related readmission, without increasing the risk for overdose.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: As ambulatory spine surgery increases, efficient recovery and discharge become essential. Multimodal analgesia is superior to opioids alone. Acetaminophen is a central component of multimodal protocols and both intravenous and oral forms are used. While some advantages for intravenous acetaminophen have been touted, prospective studies with patient-centered outcomes are lacking in ambulatory spine surgery. A substantial cost difference exists. We hypothesized that intravenous acetaminophen would be associated with fewer opioids and better recovery. METHODS: Patients undergoing ambulatory spine surgery were randomized to preoperative oral placebo and intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen or preoperative oral acetaminophen. All patients received general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was 24-hour opioid use in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), beginning with arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included pain, Quality of Recovery (QoR)-15 scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, recovery time, and correlations between pain catastrophizing, QoR-15, and pain. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in final analyses. Demographics were similar between groups. For the primary outcome, the median 24-hour MMEs did not differ between groups (12.6 (4.0, 27.1) vs 12.0 (4.0, 29.5) mg, p=0.893). Postoperative pain ratings, PACU MMEs, QoR-15 scores, and recovery time showed no differences. Spearman's correlation showed a moderate negative correlation between postoperative opioid use and QoR-15. CONCLUSION: Intravenous acetaminophen was not superior to the oral form in ambulatory spine surgery patients. This does not support routine use of the more expensive intravenous form to improve recovery and accelerate discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04574778.
