Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Nagoya J Med Sci ; 78(4): 399-406, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28008195

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute and late toxicity as well as local control (LC) in T1 glottic cancer (GC) patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in clinical practice. The Tokai Study Group for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology started RT treatment with a dose of 2.25 Gy for T1 GC in 2011. Ten institutions combined data from 104 patients with T1 squamous cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2015. In total, 104 patients with T1 GC were irradiated with a standard radiation dose of 63 Gy in 28 fractions.The median follow-up duration was 18 (3.7-49.5) months. Acute grade 3 adverse events were observed in 7 patients, with 4 patients (5%) having dermatitis and 3 patients (4%) having mucositis. Late adverse events above grade 3 were not observed. Two patients developed local recurrence. The rates of acute adverse events in the present study were comparable to those in previous studies that have used 2 Gy fractions of RT.

2.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 37(13): 2929-31, 2010 Dec.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21160273

ABSTRACT

We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with multiple lymph node metastases after ascending colon cancer who received radiation therapy and then chemotherapy with S-1. She was diagnosed with lymph node metastasis of the para aorta and left upper clavicle 10 months after surgery. We performed radiation therapy for the left upper clavicle (64 Gy)and para aorta (40 Gy). Consequently, we administered S-1(100mg/day)orally. After three months, the upper clavicle lymph nodes had disappeared and the para-aortic lymph nodes reduced. All metastatic lesions disappeared after 10 months. She survived for 32 months after the radiation therapy.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Oxonic Acid/therapeutic use , Tegafur/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/radiotherapy , Middle Aged , Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage , Tegafur/administration & dosage
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 102(3): 493-9, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16478629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the combination of intraarterial and intravenous concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CIAIV-CCRT) for the treatment of high-risk uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: Between January 2000 and November 2004, we reviewed 45 cervical cancer patients treated by CIAIV-CCRT. The numbers of patients with stage IB2, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA were 3, 6, 14, 1, 17, and 4, respectively. Patients with stage III and IVA or patients with tumors >3 cm in diameter were enrolled in this study. Two sessions of CCRT were administered every 3 weeks using a combination of 70 mg/m2 x h(-1) cisplatin or 50 mg/m2 x h(-1) nedaplatin via the bilateral uterine artery and 2800 mg/m2 x 96 h(-1) 5-fluorouracil intravenously. Patients concurrently received external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy. A nonrandomized control group of 47 patients who underwent radiation therapy alone between 1993 and 2000 was used for comparison. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 28 (62%) exhibited complete response and 16 (36%) exhibited partial response. One IIIB patient (2%) did not show any response. The 5-year overall survival (OAS) rates in the CCRT group and control group were 80.6% and 54.9%, respectively. With regard to late toxicities, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups. In uni- and multivariate analyses, positive pelvic lymph node showed a statistically significant influence on the OAS in the CIAIV-CCRT group (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that CIAIV-CCRT can improve the prognosis of patients with high-risk cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intra-Arterial , Injections, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Survival Analysis
4.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 34(3): 142-8, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15078910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome results for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix between patients treated in a single facility [single facility therapy: (SFT)] and others combined with external beam irradiation (EBRT) in a small facility and intracavitary brachytherapy in a central facility (combined facilities therapy: CFT). METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 155 patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix radically treated by EBRT and high dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy from August 1995 to May 2000. The overall survival and cause-specific survival rates were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The endpoint was defined as death due to cervical cancer for the cause-specific survival. The log-rank test and the generalized Wilcoxon test were used to compare the survival curves between the two treatment groups. RESULTS: Nine patients were lost, so 146 patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were 22 patients (15%) in stage I, 21 (14%) stage IIA, 51 (35%) stage IIB, 41 (28%) stage III, 11 (8%) stage IVA. The median age was 72 years (range, 30-89 years). The median follow-up time was 58 months. The proportion of patients treated with SFT was 23% (33/146) and CFT 77% (113/146). The overall survival rate was 62.3% and the cause-specific survival rate was 71.3%. The cause-specific survival rates for SFT and CFT were 87.9% and 66.4%, respectively; the difference between these two treatments was statistically significant (P = 0.024). The difference in the survival rate between these two treatments for stage III and IVA patients was also statistically significant (P = 0.021). However, no significant difference between these treatments was seen in the cause-specific survival rate for each stage. There was a significant difference between SFT and CFT in the incidence rate of severe late complications (grade 3-5) (P = 0.038). There was no significant difference in overall treatment times and total dose between the two groups; the applied photon beam energy showed a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the survival outcome will be aggravated by CFT. If the treatment process of using a lower photon beam energy were to be improved by the installation of a high-energy linear accelerator, CFT can be applied to patients with cervical cancer.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...