[Educational Project of Self-Removal of the Intravenous Central Venous Access Port Guided by Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer Instructed by a Nurse in the University Hospital].

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil infusion for 46±5h from the central venous(CV)port is required for mFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer(CRC), followed by self-removal of the needle by patients. At our hospital, outpatients were instructed for self-removal of the needle, but the results were unsatisfactory. Therefore, instructions for self-removal of the needle from the CV port have been initiated at the patient ward since April 2019, making use of a hospital stay of 3 days. PATIENTS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with chemotherapy-introduced advanced CRC from the CV port who received instructions for self-removal of the needle in the outpatient department and ward between January 2018 and December 2021. RESULTS: Of all patients with advanced CRC, 21 received instructions at the outpatient department(OP)while 67 at patient ward(PW). Incidences of successful self-removal of the needle without the aid of others were similar: 47% in OP and 52% in PW(p=0.80). However, after several additional instructions involving their families, it was higher in PW than in OP(97.0 vs 76.1%, p=0.005). Incidences of successful self-removal of the needle without the aid of others in those aged≥75/<75, and≥65/<65 years were 0%/61.1%, and 35.4%/67.5%, respectively. OP was as a risk factor for failed self-removal of the needle in the logistic regression analysis(odds ratio: 11.19, 95%CI: 1.86- 67.30). CONCLUSION: Repeated instructions involving patients' families during the hospital stay improved the incidence of successful self-removal of the needle. Involvement of patients' families from the beginning may effectively improve self- removal of the needle, particularly in the elderly patients with advanced CRC.

[Challenge of Skin Treatment Led by Nurses and Pharmacists for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-EGFR Antibodies].

Preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists was started for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)who received anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Incidence of skin-related toxicities, amount of topical moisturizers used, and administered cycles of anti-EGFR antibody were retrospectively compared between a preemptive skin treatment group and a control group. Thirty-four mCRC patients before the introduction of preemptive skin treatment led by nurses and 23 mCRC patients treated with preemptive skin treatment led by nurses were evaluated. The incidence of 6- and 12- week Grade 2 or higher skin-related toxicity was 23.5% in the control group and 8.7% in the preemptive group(p=0.18), and 67.7% in the control group and 30.4% in the preemptive group(p=0.0076), respectively. Mean amounts of moisturizer used were both lower in the control group than in the preemptive group at both 6 weeks and 7-12 weeks(6 weeks; 275 g vs 550 g, p=0.036, 7-12 weeks; 575 g vs 1,175 g, p=0.013). However, the amount of topical steroid used was similar in both groups. Preemptive moisturizer skin treatment led by nurses and pharmacists may decrease the incidence of skin- related toxicity.