ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate surgical results and pregnancy outcomes of preconception laparoscopic cervical cerclage (LCC) in women with cervical insufficiency. Study design: We conducted an observational study in consecutive women who had preconception LCC. Data was prospectively collected from 55 women at high risk of second trimester miscarriage and extreme preterm delivery due to cervical insufficiency who underwent pre-conception LCC between January 2017 - December 2021. This included patient demographics and relevant obstetric & gynaecological history, previous cervical cerclage, operative complications and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. All women included in study had at least one previous unsuccessful transvaginal cervical cerclage. The surgeries were conducted in private tertiary hospital in Hyderabad, India. The follow-up was until December 2022. The primary outcome was neonatal survival. Surgical morbidity and complications were also recorded. Results: There were 49 pregnancies of which 46 progressed beyond first trimester. 4.34 % (2/46) were delivered between 28 and 33 weeks due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). 13.04 % (6/46) including 5 women with pregnancy complications and one with unicornuate uterus needed delivery between 34 and 36 weeks. 82.60 % (38/46) women were delivered at or beyond 37 weeks of pregnancy. In those who carried pregnancy beyond first trimester, live-birth rate and neonatal survival rate were 100 %. All neonates had favourable outcome with no long-term morbidity. There were no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. Two women had long-term complication in the form of tape erosion needing further surgery. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that LCC improves pregnancy outcomes significantly in those with cervical weakness, without increasing the safety risk.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) in inducing ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who failed to conceive after medical methods of ovulation induction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all women who underwent LOD as a treatment for anovulatory infertility between January 2010 and December 2011 was conducted. Women diagnosed to have PCOS by the Rotterdam criteria were considered for the study. Those who had PCOS but were associated with male factor infertility, deep infiltrating endometriosis and submucous fibroids were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 43 women underwent LOD during the study period. Majority were aged 26 to 30 years and two-thirds were overweight or obese. Most (72%) of them had primary infertility. Other factors which could have contributed to infertility such as superficial endometriosis, septate uterus and unilateral tubal block were observed in 30.2% of the women, which were dealt with concomitantly. When we excluded the 14% who were lost to follow up, 23 of 43 (53.5%) women achieved pregnancy and almost 70% of them did so within the first 6 months. None of our study population had ovarian hyperstimulation or multiple pregnancy. CONCLUSION: LOD thus not only helps in regulating ovulation and enhancing conception rates but also provides an opportunity to assess the pelvis for other potential causes of subfertility which could be treated at the same time. We therefore believe that diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy should be offered quite high-up in the hierarchy of infertility investigations and treatment.
