Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao ; 31(7): 2422-2430, 2020 Jul.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715709

ABSTRACT

A field experiment with five treatments, control (CK, no fertilizer), conventional fertilization (U), double-effect inhibitor synergistic urea (DU), coated urea (CU) and slow/controlled release urea mixture (CDU), was conducted to investigate the effects of conventional fertilization (240 kg N·hm-2) and one-off application of different slow/controlled release fertilizers (180 kg N·hm-2) on the yield and quality of fresh maize, soil inorganic nitrogen (N), and ammonia (NH3) emissions. The results showed that the total amount of ammonia volatilization was the highest in treatment of conventional fertilization (U), with N topdressing being an important source of NH3 emission. Compared with U treatment, the NH3 volatilization in the DU, CU, and CDU treatments was reduced by 78%-81%. At harvest stage, the soil layer of 80-100 cm in the U treatment had the highest nitrate concentration (51.6 mg·kg-1), resulting in a high risk of N leaching. In contrast, the nitrate concentrations in the same soil layer in the slow/controlled release fertilizer treatments were much lower, reducing the risk of leaching. In comparison with U, three slow/controlled release fertilizer treatments with 25% lower N application did not decrease yield but increased seed Vc, soluble sugar and protein contents. The agronomic efficiency and economic benefit of DU treatment were the highest among three slow/controlled release fertilizers treatments. In conclusion, the application of new type of slow/controlled release fertilizer could improve the yield and quality of fresh maize, and significantly reduce the risk of ammonia loss and N leaching. Considering the higher cost of the polymer coated urea, the double-effect inhibitor urea has lower cost and is more convenient to make. It is therefore a better choice to fresh maize planting.


Subject(s)
Ammonia/analysis , Fertilizers/analysis , Agriculture , Delayed-Action Preparations , Nitrogen , Soil , Zea mays
2.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao ; 21(12): 3147-53, 2010 Dec.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21443002

ABSTRACT

An open field experiment was conducted to study the effects of applying controlled-release fertilizer blended with rapidly available chemical N fertilizer on Chinese cabbage yield and quality as well as nitrogen losses, including ammonia volatilization and NO3- -N accumulation and leaching in Beijing suburb. The results showed that a combined application of 2:1 controlled-release fertilizer and urea fertilizer (total N rate 150 kg x hm(-2)) did not induce the reduction of Chinese cabbage yield, and decreased the leaf nitrate and organic acid contents significantly, compared with conventional urea N application (300 kg x hm(-2)), and had no significant difference in the cabbage yield and leaf nitrate content, compared with applying 150 kg x hm(-2) of urea N. The combined application of 2:1 controlled-release fertilizer and urea fertilizer improved the N use efficiency of Chinese cabbage, and reduced the ammonia volatilization and NO3- -N leaching. At harvest, the NO3- -N concentrations in 20-40, 60-80 and 80-100 cm soil layers were significantly lower in the combined application treatment than in urea N treatment.


Subject(s)
Biomass , Brassica/growth & development , Fertilizers , Nitrogen/pharmacology , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , China , Groundwater/analysis , Nitrogen/analysis , Quality Control , Soil/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...