The Relationship between Blood Groups and Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Plenty of diseases have been found having associations with blood types, especially cardiovascular diseases. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether there is a relationship between blood groups and acute aortic dissection. We also further studied the distribution of blood groups in different types of acute aortic dissection. METHODS: A total of 291 patients diagnosed with acute aortic dissection from 2011 to 2018 were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively in this study. The control group consisted of 582 patients who received plastic surgery at West China hospital from 2011 to 2018. First, we analyzed the distribution of blood groups between the study group and the control group, including the ABO, Rh, O and non-O groups. Then, we further divided the study group into two groups by the type of acute aortic dissection to determine if there was difference in blood groups between the two types of acute aortic dissection. RESULTS: The analysis of the distribution of ABO blood groups (p = 0.302) and Rh blood groups (p = 0.502) did not reveal statistically significant differences. There were no statistically significant differences in the distributions of ABO blood groups and Rh blood groups in different types of acute aortic dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not prove the incidence of acute aortic dissection, or the type of acute aortic dissection had a relationship with common blood groups.

Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and feasible in pregnant women during second trimester: A retrospective study in a top-level Chinese center.

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common nonobstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy. According to the current guidelines and meta-analyses, traditional open appendectomy (OA) is still recommended for pregnant patients over laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), which might be associated with higher rates of fetal loss. Previous studies and experiences indicated that LA might be safe in the second trimester of pregnancy. The current study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LA in pregnant women during the second trimester.At our institution, a retrospective study was conducted with pregnant patients who underwent LA or OA during the second trimester between January 2016 and August 2018.A total of 48 patients were enrolled. Of them, 12 were managed with laparoscopy and 36 with the open approach. We found that the LA group had higher BMIs than the OA group (4.0 ±â€Š4.3 vs 21.5 ±â€Š2.9, P = .031). The financial results showed that the average daily medical costs for patients who underwent LA was higher than those who underwent OA (444 ±â€Š107 US$ vs 340 ±â€Š115 US$, P = .009), while the total cost of hospitalization was comparable between the 2 approaches. The perioperative and obstetric outcomes were comparable between LA and OA. In each group, only 1 patient had fetal loss. No "Yinao" was found in any of the patients in the LA group.In this study, with the proven advantages of the laparoscopic techniques, LA was found to be safe and feasible for pregnant women during the second trimester.