Clinical evaluation of a multitarget fecal immunochemical test-sDNA test for colorectal cancer screening in a high-risk population: a prospective, multicenter clinical study.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major malignancy threatening the health of people in China and screening could be effective for preventing the occurrence and reducing the mortality of CRC. We conducted a multicenter, prospective clinical study which recruited 4,245 high-risk CRC individuals defined as having positive risk-adapted scores or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results, to evaluate the clinical performance of the multitarget fecal immunochemical and stool DNA (FIT-sDNA) test for CRC screening. Each participant was asked to provide a stool sample prior to bowel preparation, and FIT-sDNA test and FIT were performed independently of colonoscopy. We found that 186 (4.4%) were confirmed to have CRC, and 375 (8.8%) had advanced precancerous neoplasia among the high CRC risk individuals. The sensitivity of detecting CRC for FIT-sDNA test was 91.9% (95% CI, 86.8-95.3), compared with 62.4% (95% CI, 54.9-69.3) for FIT (P < 0.001). The sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous neoplasia was 63.5% (95% CI, 58.3-68.3) for FIT-sDNA test, compared with 30.9% (95% CI, 26.3-35.6) for FIT (P < 0.001). Multitarget FIT-sDNA test detected more colorectal advanced neoplasia than FIT. Overall, these findings indicated that in areas with limited colonoscopy resources, FIT-sDNA test could be a promising further risk triaging modality to select patients for colonoscopy in CRC screening.

Closure of pelvic peritoneum with bladder peritoneum flap reconstruction after laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A prospective stage II study.

BACKGROUND: Extralevator abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) has increased perineal wound complications due to the extended resection area. Closure of the pelvic peritoneum (CPP) may exclude the abdominal content from descending into the pelvic cavity and reduce the incidence of perineal complications after ELAPE. We have previously introduced bladder peritoneum flap reconstruction (BLAPER) as a novel method for patients in whom traditional CPP is not possible. The aim of the present study was to report the development and preliminary outcomes of BLAPER. METHODS: This is a prospective single-arm study at the development and exploration phase and fulfills the IDEAL framework stage II. Ultralow rectal cancer patients with rigid pelvis who underwent ELAPE with BLAPER were enrolled. Primary outcomes were intraoperative complications and postoperative complications within 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: Among 27 patients included, the overall success rate of BLAPER was 96.3% (26/27). Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and antiadhesive barrier placement were introduced to improve the BLAPER technique. The incidence of major pelvic wound complications was 7.7%. No patient who underwent BLAPER has suffered small bowel obstruction (SBO), presence of small bowel in the retrourogenital space, or perineal hernia (PH). CONCLUSIONS: BLAPER is safe and may prevent the small bowel from descending into the retrourogenital space and subsequently developing PH and SBO without increasing the intraoperative and postoperative complications. BLAPER may serve as an option when the primary suture of the pelvic peritoneum is not feasible.

Day-case loop ileostomy reversal based on the community hospital joined enhanced recovery after surgery (CHJ-ERAS) program in China: Safe and feasible.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the feasibility of Day-case loop ileostomy reversal (DLIR) in China based on the community hospital joined enhanced recovery after surgery (CHJ-ERAS) program. METHOD: Patients who underwent loop ileostomy were enrolled in the CHJ-ERAS program for DLIR after rigorous evaluation. The primary outcome was the results of short-term follow-ups. RESULTS: From August 2017 to April 2022, 216 patients have been enrolled in the CHJ-ERAS program for DLIR. After DLIR, 14 patients (14/216, 6.5%) have recorded 17 episodes of postoperative complications within 1 month after surgery, including 10 readmission and 2 reoperation. Compared with in-patient loop ileostomy reversal, DLIR based on CHJ-ERAS did not increase the postoperative complications and reoperations. CONCLUSION: The CMJ-ERAS program for DLIR in our center is a safe and feasible alternative option for inpatient LIR and an acceptable transitional approach for the development of day-case DLIR in developing countries.

Clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of pT4 stage II colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair status: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIB/C CRC and defective mismatch repair (dMMr) status, and to evaluate what is the determinant risk factor for adjuvant chemotherapy in those patients. METHOD: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library databases will be performed. All RCTs published in electronic databases from inception to March 19, 2020, with language restricted in English will be included in this review study. Two reviewers will independently perform the Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and assessment of risk bias and will be supervised by third party. Outcomes consisted of overall survival, progression-free survival and sufficient information to extract hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals and it will be calculated to present the prognostic role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIB/C CRC and dMMR status using Review Manager version 5.3 when there is sufficient available data. RESULTS: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This study will summarize up-to-date evidence to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIB/C CRC and dMMR status and provide a scientific and practical suggestions for treatment decision-making. REGISTRATION: This protocol has been registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) with a registration number of INPLASY202050019.

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagogastrectomy Without Thoracic or Cervical Access: A Series of One Hundred Three Consecutive Cases.

AIM: To evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagogastrectomy (LTEG) for treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). METHODS: Patients with AEG who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery at our department from October 2008 to December 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients' demographics, perioperative outcomes, and survival data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with AEG were enrolled (103 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and 33 patients underwent open surgery). Patient characteristics were comparable between two groups in terms of age, gender, tumor-node-metastasis stage, tumor size, preoperative complications, and type of surgery. The median operative time was longer in laparoscopic group (240 versus 210 minutes, P = .048). However, the estimated blood loss was less, and the rate of pleural rupture was lower in laparoscopic group (20 versus 70 mL, P < .001 and 18.4% versus 36.4%, P = .033, respectively). The rate of patients with pleural rupture requiring prolonged use of mechanical ventilation longer than 12 hours (6/31, 19.4%) was higher than that of patients without pleural rupture (6/105, 5.7%) (P = .019). The incidence of reflux symptoms at postoperative month six was similar in two groups (18.4% in laparoscopic group versus 24.2% in open group, P = .468), as well as the use of proton pump inhibitors (12.6% versus 15.2%, P = .709). Furthermore, the number of lymph nodes harvested (22 versus 25), 2-year cumulative overall survival rates (80.4% versus 57.5%), and the median survival times (51.52 months versus 24.24 months) were similar between two groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: LTEG is a safe, feasible, and oncologically effective procedure for AEG when performed by an experienced surgeon. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with a lower risk of pleural rupture, but pleural rupture in laparoscopic surgery may cause an adverse effect on the recovery of pulmonary function presumably due to tension pneumothorax.

[The Comparison Between Extraction Methods of Exosomes From Ascites of Colorectal Cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the two different methods to isolate the exosome from the ascites of colorectal cancer (CRC) patient and find the efficient one. METHODS: Exosome from the ascites of CRC patient were isolated by two different methods: density gradient exosome isolation (DG-Exo) and Exo-Quick isolation, and followed by identification with transmission electron microscopy observation and Western blot analysis. And then, Nanodrop was used for protein quantification. RESULTS: Exosome were isolated by both of the two methods. The protein concentration of the exosome isolated by the Exo-Quick isolation were higher than that of DG-Exo. CONCLUSION: Exo-Quick isolation can obtain higher purity and more complete exosome from the ascites.

Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: a meta-analysis.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of the transthoracic and transhiatal approaches for cancer of the esophagogastric junction. METHODS: An electronic and manual search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane Library for articles published between March 1998 and January 2013. The pooled data included the following parameters: duration of surgical time, blood loss, dissected lymph nodes, hospital stay time, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, 30-d hospital mortality, and long-term survival. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding single studies. RESULTS: Eight studies including 1155 patients with cancer of the esophagogastric junction, with 639 patients in the transthoracic group and 516 in the transhiatal group, were pooled for this study. There were no significant differences between two groups concerning surgical time, blood loss, anastomotic leakage, or cardiovascular complications. Dissected lymph nodes also showed no significant differences between two groups in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. However, we did observe a shorter hospital stay (WMD = 1.92, 95%CI: 1.63-2.22, P < 0.00001), lower 30-d hospital mortality (OR = 3.21, 95%CI: 1.13-9.12, P = 0.03), and decreased pulmonary complications (OR = 2.95, 95%CI: 1.95-4.45, P < 0.00001) in the transhiatal group. For overall survival, a potential survival benefit was achieved for type III tumors with the transhiatal approach. CONCLUSION: The transhiatal approach for cancers of the esophagogastric junction, especially types III, should be recommended, and its long-term outcome benefits should be further evaluated.

Is Dor fundoplication optimum after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia? A meta-analysis.

AIM: To compare the outcome of acid reflux prevention by Dor fundoplication after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for achalasia. METHODS: Electronic database PubMed, Ovid (Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, EmBase and Ovid MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library were searched between January 1995 and September 2012. Bibliographic citation management software (EndNote X3) was used for extracted literature management. Quality assessment of random controlled studies (RCTs) and non-RCTs was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 and a modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (Version 5.1), and sensitivity analysis was performed by sequentially omitting each study. RESULTS: Finally, 6 studies, including a total of 523 achalasia patients, compared Dor fundoplication with other types of fundoplication after LHM (Dor-other group), and 8 studies, including a total of 528 achalasia patients, compared Dor fundoplication with no fundoplication after LHM (Dor-no group). Dor fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate of clinical regurgitation and pathological acid reflux compared with the other fundoplication group (OR = 7.16, 95%CI: 1.25-40.93, P = 0.03, and OR = 3.79, 95%CI: 1.23-11.72, P = 0.02, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences between Dor fundoplication and no fundoplication in all subjects. Other outcomes, including complications, dysphagia, postoperative physiologic testing, and operation-related data displayed no significant differences in the two comparison groups. CONCLUSION: Dor fundoplication is not the optimum procedure after LHM for achalasia. We suggest more attention should be paid on quality of life among different fundoplications.

[Transabdominal and transhiatal esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy using novel double stapling technique].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the techniques of esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy in the mediastinum through the abdomen and hiatus after extended proximal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy. METHODS: From May 2010 to January 2012, 15 patients with esophagogastric junction carcinoma underwent open transhiatal extended gastrostomy or total gastrectomy. After full mobilization, the anvil was reversely introduced into the esophagus and the esophagus was transected with curved stapler. The rod of the anvil was then pulled out with a stitch to complete esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy(n=9) or esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy(n=6). RESULTS: The anastomosis was successfully performed in all the patients. The mean operation time was(185.5±13.1) min. The mean operation time for anastomosis was(42.0±8.6) min. The mean estimated blood loss was (106.7±34.9) ml. The proximal resection margin was(4.4±1.2) cm. All the margins were negative for residual cancer. There was no postoperative death or fistula. During the follow up, there was one case of anastomotic stenosis which was successfully managed by endoscopic balloon dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy can be safely performed with double stapling technique including reverse anvil introduction and curved stapling transection of the esophagus. It is an ideal technique for anastomosis after extended gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma.

[A prospective study on quality of life in post-operative colorectal cancer patients with fast-track].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of postoperative recovery and short term quality of life in the patients with colorectal cancer in fast track model. METHODS: There were 122 patients enrolled into this prospective study in Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, from October 2008 to January 2009, and 121 patients completed the whole study. The patients were divided into the fast track group (62 cases) and the tradition track group (59 cases), postoperative recovery and the QLQ-C30 scores were evaluated at one week after the surgery. RESULTS: The fast track group showed earlier recovery than the tradition group in first aerofluxus [(3.96 +/- 1.40) d vs. (5.66 +/- 3.11) d, P < 0.05], first intake [(3.12 +/- 1.93) d vs. (5.96 +/- 3.23) d, P < 0.05], first ambulation [(2.05 +/- 1.16) d vs. (5.13 +/- 1.36) d, P < 0.05] and in-hospital time post-operation [(7.85 +/- 5.31) d vs. (10.11 +/- 3.37) d, P < 0.05]. The incidence of wound infection (1.61% vs. 6.78%, P < 0.05) and intestinal obstruction (1.61% vs. 8.47%, P < 0.05) in fast track were significantly lower than those in the traditional track group. The general health of fast track in C30 is better too (80.46 +/- 15.54 vs. 76.58 +/- 15.28, P < 0.05). In the functional assessment of C30, the physical function (87.35 +/- 5.12 vs. 85.02 +/- 8.70, P < 0.05) and emotional function (90.00 +/- 0.00 vs. 85.35 +/- 12.39, P < 0.05) both were better in the fast track group. In the symptom assessment of C30, fast track group is less fatigue (71.70 +/- 2.86 vs. 87.12 +/- 10.80, P < 0.05) and pain (71.78 +/- 3.76 vs. 77.63 +/- 8.33, P < 0.05). Better sleep (75.78 +/- 11.68 vs. 82.70 +/- 19.40, P < 0.05) and less loss of appetite(73.24 +/- 8.60 vs. 78.02 +/- 16.42, P < 0.05) were found in fast track group. CONCLUSION: The fast track group manifested faster in postoperative recovery and can improve the quality of life in postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.