Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 78(4 Suppl): A67-78, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17511301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The bioeffects of space radiation on organisms outside of the environment of Earth's magnetosphere are a concern for long-duration exploration spaceflights. Potential mutagenic effects from space radiation exposure result from direct DNA damage or indirectly from the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). HYPOTHESES: 1) Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) measurements in cell culture monolayers may be used as a model system for detecting cell damage produced by exposure to simulated space radiation and for testing potential chemoprotective agents; 2) biomarkers of exposure that quantitate indirect radiation effects may allow prediction of cellular DNA damage; and 3) a multiple agent, chemoprevention cocktail may reduce the bioeffects of simulated space radiation. METHODS: Normal human and canine lung, breast, and renal epithelial cells were assayed in vitro and exposed to escalating doses of gamma or heavy-ion carbon (290 MeV/u), ceon (400 MeV/u), or iron (600 MeV/u) irradiation. Post-exposure measurements of TER, lipid peroxidation (LP) via measurement of 4-hydroxy-nonenal (4-HNE), and malonaldehyde (MDA) and assessment of chromosome damage via fluorescence in situ hybridization with tandem labeling of chromosome 1 were performed. RESULTS: Cells exposed to intermediate or high doses of radiation (5, 10, and 25 Gy) showed characteristic diminution in TER, thought to be secondary to dysfunction of tight junctions, and associated with membrane LP and other mechanisms. The cells also showed increases in 4-HNE + MDA measurements and increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations. Preliminary studies of cells incubated with media containing a combination of chemoprotective agents at the time of radiation exposure showed a 15-50% reduction in the radiation-induced changes in membrane resistance, levels of LP, and chromosomal aberrations relative to their unprotected cellular counterparts. CONCLUSION: TER measurement, in conjunction with measures of LP, may provide a useful model for determination of physiological changes caused by radiation exposure and the efficacy of chemoprotective agents. A multi-agent mixture of chemoprotective agents may be more effective than previously evaluated single agents alone.


Subject(s)
Astronauts , Epithelial Cells/radiation effects , Extraterrestrial Environment , Radiation, Ionizing , Space Flight , Weightlessness , Animals , Biomarkers , Cell Death/radiation effects , Chemoprevention , Chromosome Aberrations/radiation effects , Dogs , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Lipid Peroxidation/physiology , Lipid Peroxidation/radiation effects , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Oxidative Stress/radiation effects , Radiation-Protective Agents , Reactive Oxygen Species/radiation effects , Space Simulation
2.
J Radiat Res ; 47 Suppl A: A165-9, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16571933

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the results of a biodosimetry investigation are reported for two villages in the area of the Semipalatinsk nuclear testing site: Chekoman and Dolon. Chekoman village is considered to be relatively less affected by radiation in comparison with Dolon village. The distance between the two villages is about 100 km and the life styles of the residents are similar. Chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes collected from the residents of the two villages were analyzed using the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. Our results showed that the average frequency of stable translocations for the Dolon group was significantly greater that of the Chekoman group. The elevated level of stable translocations with the Dolon residents corresponds to a dose of about 180 mSv.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Chromosome Aberrations/statistics & numerical data , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/statistics & numerical data , Lymphocytes/ultrastructure , Nuclear Warfare/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Radiometry/methods , Adult , Body Burden , Humans , Incidence , Kazakhstan/epidemiology , Lymphocytes/radiation effects , Radiation Injuries/genetics , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors
3.
Radiat Res ; 160(4): 425-35, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12968931

ABSTRACT

Chromosome aberrations were investigated in human lymphocytes after in vitro exposure to 1H-, 3He-, 12C-, 40Ar-, 28Si-, 56Fe-, or 197Au-ion beams, with LET ranging from approximately 0.4-1393 keV/microm in the dose range of 0.075-3 Gy. Dose-response curves for chromosome exchanges, measured at the first mitosis postirradiation using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with whole-chromosome probes, were fitted with linear or linear-quadratic functions. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was estimated from the initial slope of the dose-response curve for chromosomal damage with respect to low- or high-dose-rate gamma rays. Estimates of RBEmax values for mitotic spreads, which ranged from near 0.7 to 11.1 for total exchanges, increased with LET, reaching a maximum at about 150 keV/microm, and decreased with further increase in LET. RBEs for complex aberrations are undefined due to the lack of an initial slope for gamma rays. Additionally, the effect of mitotic delay on RBE values was investigated by measuring chromosome aberrations in interphase after chemically induced premature chromosome condensation (PCC), and values were up to threefold higher than for metaphase analysis.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human/radiation effects , Chromosomes, Human/ultrastructure , Linear Energy Transfer , Lymphocytes/cytology , Lymphocytes/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Interphase/radiation effects , Metaphase/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Relative Biological Effectiveness
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL