Ovarian size as a risk factor for recurrent adnexal torsion: Smaller is not better.

AIM: To investigate characteristics and risk factors for recurrent adnexal torsion (AT). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in a university-affiliated medical center included 320 Women with AT verified by laparoscopy, from January 2005 through January 2017. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, surgical findings and treatment were retrospectively reviewed from patient records. Data from primary and secondary AT of patients in the recurrent torsion group was compared to those with single torsion, to evaluate risk factors for recurrent AT. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty seven (83.4%) patients had a single event of AT and 53 (16.5%) had recurrent AT. Patients with recurrent torsion had significantly fewer previous non-gynecologic surgeries (4.3% and 9.8% of the study groups vs 32.2% of the control group, P = 0.001 for both). Ovarian size was significantly smaller in the recurrent torsion groups (47.5 mm and 48.3 mm vs 63.9 mm, P = 0.045 and P = 0.012, respectively). Polycystic ovary was significantly more common in the recurrent AT group (P = 0.028 and P = 0.005), with risk ratio 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.66 to 11.63). Ovaries without any specific findings were also more common among recurrent AT cases (P = 0.001 for both groups). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that smaller ovarian size is an independent risk factor for recurrent AT. CONCLUSION: Recurrent torsion correlated with fewer previous surgeries, small ovarian mass, polycystic ovaries and ovaries without specific findings, which might indicate that additional pathophysiological factors contribute to the recurrent event. Ovarian fixation might be recommended in patients with primary torsion of normal or polycystic ovaries.

Does stress affect IVF outcomes? A prospective study of physiological and psychological stress in women undergoing IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of physiological and psychological stress on fertility outcomes for women undergoing IVF? DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 72 patients undergoing IVF in 2017 and 2018. Physiological stress was assessed by salivary cortisol measurements: (i) pretreatment, when the patient received the IVF protocol; (ii) before oocyte retrieval (follicular cortisol was also measured); and (iii) before embryo transfer. Emotional stress was evaluated at each assessment with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and a 1-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, referred to as the 'Stress Scale'. Correlations between cortisol concentrations, psychological stress and IVF outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Salivary cortisol concentrations increased by 28% from pretreatment phase (0.46 ± 0.28 µg/dl) to maximum concentration on oocyte retrieval day (0.59 ± 0.29 µg/dl, P = 0.029) and then decreased by 29% on embryo transfer day (0.42 ± 0.23 µg/dl, P = 0.0162). On embryo transfer day, cortisol among women in their first cycle was higher than women who underwent more than one treatment (P = 0.024). Stress Scale score increased by 39% from pretreatment to a maximum score on oocyte retrieval day and then decreased by 12% on embryo transfer day. Salivary cortisol and Stress Scale were not related to subsequent embryo transfer, fertilization rate, embryo quality or clinical pregnancy rate. Follicular cortisol concentration was positively correlated with fertilization rate (r = 0.4, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: It can be cautiously concluded that physiological and psychological stress do not negatively affect IVF outcomes. Moreover, high follicular cortisol concentrations might have positive effects on pregnancy rates.