Study on fingerprint and in vitro release of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm / 国际中医中药杂志

Objective:To establish a method of evaluating the reproducibility of the preparation process of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm. Methods:Used fingerprint spectrum technology and in vitro release test to evaluate the reproducibility preparation process of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm. By using HPLC to establish the fingerprint of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm. The chromatographic column was an Agilent HC-C18 column (4.6 mm×250 mm, 5 μm); the detection wavelength was 280 nm; the flow rate was 1 ml/min; the column temperature was 25 ℃. The mobile phase was acetonitrile-0.2% phosphoric acid aqueous solution, used gradient elution method. An HPLC method for the determination of tetrahydropalmatine content was established, and the vertical Franz diffusion cell method was used to investigate its in vitro release. Results:The results showed that the similarity between the 10 batches of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm and the control map was above 0.95, indicating that the process of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm was stable and feasible; the cumulative release amount of tetrahydropalmatine was 0.23 mg in 24 hours, and the cumulative release rate in 8 hours was 91.54%, and the RSD of 6 samples at each time point was <3%. Conclusion:The method of evaluating the reproducibility of the preparation process of Xiaozheng-Zhitong cataplasm was established by using fingerprint technology and in vitro release; it can provide a reference and scientific basis for the evaluation of the reproducibility of the preparation process of the plaster.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of traditional Chinese medicine compound kushen injection for bone cancer pain.

PURPOSE: Bone cancer pain presents a clinical challenge with limitations of current treatments. Compound kushen injection (CKI) is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulation in treatment of patients with bone cancer pain. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of CKI for bone cancer pain. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in nine databases until December 2012 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CKI versus current western therapies for bone cancer pain. The primary outcome was total pain relief rate. The secondary outcomes were the quality of life and adverse events at the end of treatment course. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed independently using six-item criteria according to the Cochrane Collaboration, and the level of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.1.0. RESULTS: Seven RCTs with 521 patients from 2010 to 2012 were identified. Compared with radiotherapy or bisphosphonates, seven RCTs showed significant effects of CKI for improving pain relief in patients with bone cancer pain (n = 521, risk ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95 % CI (95 % confidence intervals (CI)), 1.13 to 1.38, p < 0.0001)), three RCTs for improving Karnofsky scoring (KPS) increase rate (n = 305, RR = 1.62, 95 % CI, 1.32 to 1.99, p < 0.00001), 1 RCT for increasing KPS scores (n = 78, mean difference (MD) = 10.43, 95 % CI 4.76 to 16.10, p = 0.0003). 4 RCTs reported adverse effects in both the treatment and control groups. The patients treated with CKI achieved statistically significant reductions of incidences of leukopenia (n = 276, RR = 0.32, 95 % CI, 0.21 to 0.47, p < 0.00001) and nausea (n = 78, RR = 0.15, 95 % CI, 0.06 to 0.34, p < 0.00001). No severe adverse events were found and no treatment was stopped because of adverse events of CKI in the treatment groups. However, the studies were deemed to have a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed positive but weak evidence of CKI for bone cancer pain because of the poor methodological quality and the small quantity of the included trials. Future rigorously designed RCTs are required.

Discussion on six errors of formulas corresponding to syndromes in using the classic formulas / 中西医结合学报

The theory of formulas corresponding to syndromes is one of the characteristics of Treatise on Cold Damage and Miscellaneous Diseases (Shanghan Zabing Lun) and one of the main principles in applying classic prescriptions. It is important to take effect by following the principle of formulas corresponding to syndromes. However, some medical practitioners always feel that the actual clinical effect is far less than expected. Six errors in the use of classic prescriptions as well as the theory of formulas corresponding to syndromes are the most important causes to be considered, i.e. paying attention only to the local syndromes while neglecting the whole, paying attention only to formulas corresponding to syndromes while neglecting the pathogenesis, paying attention only to syndromes while neglecting the pulse diagnosis, paying attention only to unilateral prescription but neglecting the combined prescriptions, paying attention only to classic prescriptions while neglecting the modern formulas, and paying attention only to the formulas but neglecting the drug dosage. Therefore, not only the patients' clinical syndromes, but also the combination of main syndrome and pathogenesis simultaneously is necessary in the clinical applications of classic prescriptions and the theory of prescription corresponding to syndrome. In addition, comprehensive syndrome differentiation, modern formulas, current prescriptions, combined prescriptions, and drug dosage all contribute to avoid clinical errors and improve clinical effects.