Efficacy and Safety of Conversion Therapy by Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Paclitaxel Plus Oral S-1 in Gastric Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Prospective Phase II Study.

Background: Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) has shown promising results in gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastasis. However, clinical practice experience of NIPS is still lacking in China. In this study, we investigate the efficacy and safety of NIPS in Chinese patients. Methods: Eligible patients received NIPS every 3 weeks. Gastrectomy was performed for patients who met the criteria of conversion surgery. The primary end point was 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, toxic effects, conversion surgery outcomes and median survival time (MST). Results: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint was achieved with 1-year OS rate reached 67.2% (95% CI, 56.8%-79.4%). Conversion surgery was performed in 42 patients (62.9%), and R0 resection was achieved in 23 patients (54.8%) with the MST of 31.3 months (95% CI, 24.3-38.3). And the MST was 19.3 months (95% CI, 16.4-22.2) for all patients. Toxicity and surgical complications were well-tolerated. Moreover, sex, R0 resection, pathological nodal stage and tumor regression grade (TRG) were independent prognostic factors for patients who underwent conversion surgery. Conclusion: The NIPS is effective and safe in treating GC patients with peritoneal metastasis. Male patients, patients who underwent R0 resection, patients with ypN0-1 or TRG 1 after conversion surgery are more likely to benefit from the NIPS. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ().

A phase III trial of neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Although recent advances in systemic chemotherapy have improved the clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, the peritoneum still represents a common site of treatment failure and disease recurrence. Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy has been acknowledged as a more aggressive treatment for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. In this multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial, 238 patients will be randomly separated into two groups in a 2:1 ratio after laparoscopic exploration. The experimental arm will receive the proposed neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy regimen, whereas the control group will receive a Paclitaxel + S-1 (PS) chemotherapy regimen. The endpoints for the study are overall survival, response rate, gastrectomy radicality rate, progression-free survival and adverse events.

Recent advances in technology have improved the outcomes of stomach cancer patients. However, there are still many patients who die of cancer that has spread from another part of the body. Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal­systemic chemotherapy has been acknowledged as a more aggressive treatment for stomach cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (cancer that has spread to the very thin layer of tissue on the inside of the abdomen that covers the stomach and other organs). In this study, 238 patients will be randomly separated into two groups in a 2:1 ratio after evaluation. The experimental group will receive the proposed neoadjuvant intraperitoneal­systemic chemotherapy regimen, whereas the control group will receive a Paclitaxel + S-1 (PS) chemotherapy regimen. The endpoints for the study are how long patients live, number of patients who respond to treatment, number of patients who undergo surgery, how long patients live without their disease getting worse and problems caused by treatment. Trial registration number: ChiCTR-IIR-16009802.

A phase II study of perioperative treatment in gastric cancer with No.16a2/b1 lymph node metastasis: DRAGON-06 trial.

Although gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis is commonly regarded as unresectable, surgeons have explored the optimal treatment for patients with PAN metastases limited to No.16a2/b1 in the past few decades. Preoperative systemic therapy combined with D2 gastrectomy plus PAN dissection may improve the prognosis of these patients. In this multicenter phase II trial, 29 gastric cancer patients with PAN metastasis limited to No.16a2/b1 will receive preoperative treatment with nab-paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1 (nab-POS: nab-paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1) and sintilimab followed by D2 gastrectomy plus PAN dissection; and postoperative treatment with oral S-1, intravenous sintilimab and intraperitoneal paclitaxel. The end points for the study are 3-year overall survival, 3-year disease-free survival, pathological response rate, incidence of postoperative complications and adverse events.

Stomach cancer with metastases in the para-aortic lymph nodes is usually considered inoperable. Chemotherapy combined with resection of the stomach and more extensive lymph node dissection may prolong the life of these patients. In this multicenter study, 29 stomach cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastases will receive preoperative treatment with nab-paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, S-1 and sintilimab, followed by resection of the stomach combined with para-aortic lymph node dissection and use of continued oral, intravenous and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The study's end points are 3-year overall survival, 3-year disease-free survival, pathological response rate, incidence of postoperative complications and adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2200061125 (ChiCTR.org.cn).

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate omentum-preserving gastrectomy for patients with T1-T3 gastric cancer.

Although complete omentectomy is traditionally performed in patients with gastric cancer as part of radical gastrectomy to ensure the elimination of micrometastases, the prognostic value of omentectomy during gastrectomy remains unclear. Retrospective studies have shown that the incidence of metastases in the greater omentum is very low in T1-T3 gastric cancer. Thus radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and preservation of the greater omentum may be a proper curative treatment for gastric cancer patients with T1-T3 tumors. The aim of this article is to describe the design and rationale for this prospective, randomized controlled DRAGON-05 trial, conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of omentum-preserving gastrectomy for patients with T1-T3 gastric cancer. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2000040045 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Study protocol of a multicenter phase III randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant laparoscopic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (NLHIPEC) followed by R0 gastrectomy with intraoperative HIPEC for advanced gastric cancer (AGC): dragon II trial.

BACKGROUND: Even though treatment modalities such as adjuvant systemic radio-chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have individually have improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC), the peritoneum still presides as a common site of treatment failure and disease recurrence. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been acknowledged as prophylaxis for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in AGC patients and in this study, we aim at investigating the safety and efficacy of the combination of neoadjuvant laparoscopic HIPEC (NLHIPEC) with NAC in the neoadjuvant phase followed by surgery of curative intent with intraoperative HIPEC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). METHODS: In this multicenter Phase III randomized controlled trial, 326 patients will be randomly separated into 2 groups into a 1:1 ratio after laparoscopic exploration. The experiment arm will receive the proposed comprehensive Dragon II regimen while the control group will undergo standard R0 D2 followed by 8 cycles of AC with oxaliplatin with S-1 (SOX) regimen. The Dragon II regimen comprises of 1 cycle of NLHIPEC for 60mins at 43 ± 0.5 °C with 80 mg/m2 of Paclitaxel followed by 3 cycles of NAC with SOX regimen and after assessment, standard R0 D2 gastrectomy with intraoperative HIPEC followed by 5 cycles of SOX regimen chemotherapy. The end-points for the study are 5 year PFS, 5 year OS, peritoneal metastasis rate (PMR) and morbidity rate. DISCUSSION: This study is one of the first to combine NLHIPEC with NAC in the preoperative phase which is speculated to provide local management of occult peritoneal carcinomatosis or peritoneal free cancer cells while NAC will promote tumor downsizing and down-staging. The addition of the intraoperative HIPEC is speculated to manage dissemination due to surgical trauma. Where the roles of intraoperative HIPEC and NAC have individually been investigated, this study provides innovative insight on a more comprehensive approach to management of AGC at high risk of peritoneal recurrence. It is expected that the combination of NLHIPEC with NAC and HIPEC will increase PFS by 15% and decrease PMR after gastrectomy of curative intent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: World Health Organization Clinical Trials - International Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) with Registration ID ChiCTR1900024552, Registered Prospectively on the 16th July, 2019.

Prophylactic HIPEC with radical D2 gastrectomy improves survival and peritoneal recurrence rates for locally advanced gastric cancer: personal experience from a randomized case control study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the implications of prophylactic intraoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with D2 radical gastrectomy for locally advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC) in a randomized case control study. METHOD: Eighty consecutive patients with locally AGC were randomly separated into 2 groups: HIPEC group (Curative Resection + intraoperative HIPEC with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 at 42.0 ± 1.0 °C for 60 min) and Control group (Curative Resection only). Intraoperative and post-operative events, clinical recovery, morbidity and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were closely monitored. RESULTS: Among the 40 HIPEC group patients, the highest intracranial temperature recorded during the procedure was 38.2 °C but the patient made an eventless recovery. Mild renal dysfunction, hyperbilirubinemia and mild liver dysfunction were recorded in the HIPEC group but their incidences were found to be statistically insignificant when compared with the control group (P > 0.05). The initial post-operative analysis revealed shorter post-operative stay for in the HIPEC group but further analysis revealed that it was related to the incidence of postoperative complication. During a median follow-up time of 41 months, there were 9/39 and 15/38 cases of disease progression in HIPEC and Control groups respectively, with a more favorable 3-year DFS (76.9% vs 60.5%) and a lower peritoneal recurrence rate (5% vs 30%) in the HIPEC group. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic HIPEC with radical D2 Gastrectomy is safe and shows favorable survival and peritoneal recurrence rates for AGC with acceptable morbidity. Nevertheless, more structured multi-centered RCT should be carried out for more substantial evidence.

Correction to: Prophylactic HIPEC with radical D2 gastrectomy improves survival and peritoneal recurrence rates for locally advanced gastric cancer: personal experience from a randomized case control study.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported the following errors/updates.

A critical analysis of the cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combo in the clinical management of advanced gastric cancer: an effective multimodality approach with scope for improvement.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is manifested in up to 40% of gastric cancer (GC) patients, after which their 5-year survival drops to less than 5%. The currently most acceptable treatment option for advanced GC (AGC) is systemic chemo and radio therapies with however generally very unsatisfying results and this led to a resurgence of interest in regional therapies like cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Small trials have indicated an association with prolonged survival when applying this technique to AGC manifesting with PC. High procedure-related morbidity and mortality associated with the CRS-HIPEC approach have however brought by a polemic on the merits of the latter: with the advent of regulatory approval of more effective as well as novel, more personalized treatment options in AGC, along with advances in tailoring investigational agents specifically for peritoneal delivery, there clearly is a need to outline the appropriate role of CRS-HIPEC in this disease. In a clear objective to improve the therapeutic efficiency of HIPEC, there have been immense developments in the technical aspects of this technology including the use of nanotechnology in more precise drug delivery systems (DDS) or choice of more efficient drugs such as gene-target technology, laparoscopy and so on. Henceforth, in this review, we will be highlighting the past and current status of the CRS + HIPEC procedure, shedding light on the pros and cons in order to boost up the efficiency of this multimodality approach.

Radical gastrectomy with combined splenectomy: unnecessary.

UNLABELLED: BACKROUND/AIMS: To analyze the prognostic value of gastric cancer surgery combined with splenectomy for gastric cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study was performed on 112 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for upper third, upper and middle third, and entire stomach cancer, 61 patients underwent spleen-preserving modified radical lymphadenectomy (spleen-preservation group), and the remaining 51 patients underwent D2 radical lymphadenectomy with splenectomy (splenectomy group). Postoperative morbidity rate and the 5-year survival rate were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the spleen-preservation group and splenectomy group in gender, age, tumor size, T stage, N stage and TNM stage. The overall 5-year survival rate was 41.0% in the spleen-preservation group, compared with 39.2% in the splenectomy group (p>0.05). The 5-year survival rate of patients in the spleen-preservation group vs splenectomy group was 100% vs 100.0% for stage I, 66.7% vs 70.0% for stage II, 27.8% vs 26.7% for stage III, and 17.4% vs 5.6%for stage IV, respectively (p>0.05). There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in postoperative morbidity rate (11.5% for spleen-preservation group vs 27.5% in the splenectomy group). CONCLUSION: Lower postoperative morbidity but similar 5-year survival rate was observed in spleen-preserving modified radical lymphadenectomy group compared to D2 radical lymphadenectomy with splenectomy.

Nasogastric decompression for radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of a nasogastric decompression in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients by a prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS: From 2007 to 2009, 161 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy were randomly selected and entered into three groups: tube group (TG), intra-operative tube group (ITG), and no-tube group (NTG). The variables studied among the groups were demographic characteristics, surgical characteristics, postoperative recovery and complications. RESULTS: With respect to demographic and surgical characteristics, there were no significant differences among the 3 groups. The time of the first passage of flatus, tolerance of water intake, liquid diet and semiliquid diet were similar among TG, ITG and NTG. Postoperative hospital stay was increased in patients from TG compared to NTG (11.3 vs. 10.2 days, p = 0.031). The incidence of nausea was significantly higher in TG than in ITG or NTG (64 vs. 36.8 and 29.6%). The overall postoperative complication rate was not significantly different among these groups (20, 15.8 and 20.4% in TG, ITG and NTG, respectively, p = 0.612). CONCLUSIONS: Radical gastrectomy can be performed safely without nasogastric decompression for gastric cancer patients. The routine prophylactic nasogastric decompression is unnecessary.

[A comparative study on the efficacy of spleen-preserving modified D2 radical gastrectomy and D2 radical gastrectomy with splenectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of modified D(2) radical total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving and D(2) radical total gastrectomy with splenectomy in patients with gastric cancer located in the upper third, upper and middle third and entire stomach. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with gastric cancer in the upper third, upper and middle third, or entire stomach underwent radical total gastrectomy between January 1989 and December 1994. Modified D(2) total radical gastrectomy with spleen-preserving (spleen-preservation group) was performed in 61 patients, and 51 underwent D(2) total radical gastrectomy with splenectomy (splenectomy group). The differences in clinicopathological characteristics,5-year survival rate, incidence of postoperative complication and hospital stay between the two groups were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the spleen-preservation group and the splenectomy group in gender, age, tumor size, T stage, N stage and TNM stage. The overall 5-year survival rate was 41.0% in the spleen-preservation group and 39.2% in the splenectomy group (P>0.05). The 5-year survival rates of patients with stage I, II, III and IIII were 100%, 66.7%, 27.8% and 17.4% in the spleen-preservation group, respectively, and were 100%, 70.0%, 26.7% and 5.6% in the splenectomy group, respectively (all P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complication was lower in the spleen-preservation group (11.5% vs 27.5%, P<0.05). The mean hospital stay was longer in the splenectomy group (27.3 d vs 20.3 d, P=0.057). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of modified D(2) radical total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving for patients with gastric cancer in the upper third, upper and middle third or entire stomach is similar to that of D(2) radical total gastrectomy with splenectomy, and the spleen-preserving procedure is associated with decreased postoperative complication and improved survival.

[Evaluation of the gastrointestinal decompression after gastrectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of using nasogastric tube for patients after gastrectomy. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients undergone gastrectomy were divided randomizely into nasogastric decompression group(n=53) and non-nasogastric decompression group (n=55). Gastrointestinal function and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Between nasogastric decompression group and non-nasogastric decompression group, no significant differences in postoperative complications (20.8% vs 23.6%, P=0.719), postoperative time of flatus [(3.2+/-0.9) d vs (3.0+/-0.7) d, P=0.192], recovery time of drinking [(5.9+/-3.4) d vs (5.1+/-1.6) d, P=0.143], eating time of fluid food [(7.8+/-3.6) d vs (6.8+/-1.8) d, P=0.085] and eating time of semi-fluid food [(9.8+/-3.5) d vs (8.8+/-1.9) d, P=0.081] were found. While the recovery time of bowl sound [(1.8+/-0.7) d vs (2.2+/-0.9) d, (P=0.013)] and hospital stay [(10.2+/-2.1) d vs (11.7+/-4.3) d, (P=0.021)] were shorter in non-nasogastric decompression group. CONCLUSION: It is not necessary to use nasogastric decompression for patients after gastrectomy.

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative peritoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients with serosal invasion. A long-term follow-up study.

AIMS: This study was undertaken to investigate the clinical effects and safety of intraoperative peritoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. METHODS: A total of 118 AGC patients with serosal invasion were enrolled in this study from 1998 to 2001, 52 underwent IPHC after gastrectomy and 66 were treated with gastrectomy only. Among these cases, 96 patients without macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for the prophylactic study, 22 with peritoneal metastases were selected for the therapeutic study. Postoperative survival, recurrence pattern and incidences of postoperative complications between patients with and without IPHC were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: For the prophylactic study, the IPHC procedure improves postoperative survival rate and decrease the incidence of peritoneal recurrence, and is an independent prognostic factor for these patients. For the therapeutic study, postoperative survival times were longer if IPHC was undertaken. No surgery-related death occurred. The incidence of renal dysfunction was higher in the IPHC group, but all patients recovered without hemodialysis. CONCLUSION: IPHC is a safe procedure that improves the survival prognosis for AGC patients with serosal invasion. It is especially beneficial for patients without peritoneal metastasis due to the reduction of postoperative peritoneal recurrence.

[Clinical effect of intraoperative peritoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of intraoperative peritoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: A total of 118 AGC patients with serosal invasion were enrolled in this study from 1998 to 2001. Among these cases, 96 patients without macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for prophylactic study, including 42 cases with IPHC and 54 cases without IPHC as control. Other 22 patients with macroscopic peritoneal metastases were selected for therapeutic study, including 10 cases with IPHC and 12 without IPHC. Postoperative survival rate and peritoneal recurrence were compared. RESULTS: For prophylactic study, the 1, 2 and 4 years survival rates were 85.7%, 81.0% and 63.9% respectively in the patients with IPHC,significantly higher than 77.3%, 61.0% and 50.8% in the patients without IPHC. Cox ratio hazard model revealed that IPHC procedure was an independent prognostic factor. More patients in the control group suffered from peritoneal recurrence than those in IPHC group (34.7% vs 10.3%). For therapeutic study,the median survival period of the patients with IPHC was 10 months, higher than 5 months in the patients without IPHC. The overall 1, 2, 4 year survival rates were 76.9%, 69.2%, 55.2% respectively in all cases with IPHC, higher than 66.2%, 49.7%, 41.4% in the cases without IPHC. CONCLUSION: IPHC procedure can improve the prognosis of AGC patients with serosal invasion, reduce the risk for peritoneal recurrence, and is an independent prognostic factor.

[Study of hepatic injury during stop-flow chemotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the hepatic injury following stop- flow chemotherapy and investigate the potential mechanisms. METHODS: Twelve healthy hybrid female pigs were randomly divided into two groups as stop- flow group (SF) and stop- flow chemotherapy (SFC) group. The expression of IL- 8 and ICAM- 1 mRNA in hepatic biopsies was detected by RT- PCR, and the expression of NF- kappa B P65 subunit in nuclei was assessed by Western blot analysis. The levels of ALT and AST, and histopathologic alterations were examined to evaluate the hepatic function at different time before and after stop- flow procedure. RESULTS: The expression of NF- kappa B P65 subunit, IL- 8 and ICAM- 1mRNA increased at 30 min after stop- flow procedure, and gradually decreased at 3 h and 6 h after stop- flow procedure. The levels of ALT and AST decreased after reaching the peak at 24 h after stop- flow procedure, but removed one week after stop- flow procedure. Cytoplasmic microvascular steatosis developed with appreciable neutrophils infiltration after early stop- flow procedure without significant destroy occurred in the structure of hepatic lobule. No significant difference of various parameters above occurred between SF and SFC groups. CONCLUSION: The hepatic injury following stop- flow procedure was self-limited and reversible. There is no severe destroy of hepatic structure and disfunction during stop- flow chemotherapy.

Hepatic preconditioning of doxorubicin in stop-flow chemotherapy: NF-kappaB/IkappaB-alpha pathway and expression of HSP72.

AIM: To provide hepatic protection through administration of doxorubicin before stop-flow chemotherapy (SFC) and to investigate the expression of heat shock protein 72 (HSP72) and role of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) in this effect. METHODS: The hepatic preconditioning of doxorubicin was established in a porcine model by injection of doxorubicin (1 mg/kg) before SFC. The experimental animals were randomized into two groups: groups receiving doxorubicin (DOX) and normal saline (NS). Serial serum and tissue samples were taken from both groups to evaluate the protection of doxorubicin. Western blot and immuno-precipitation were applied to detect the expression of HSP72, NF-kappaB p65 protein, inhibitor kappaB-alpha (IkappaB-alpha) and phosphorylated IkappaB-alpha as well. The expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) was estimated by semiquantitative RT-PCR. And the extent of the hepatic injury was estimated with the level of serum aminotransferases. RESULTS: An abundance production of HSP72 in porcine liver was observed after 24 h of intravenous administration of doxorubicin, but without any change in the expression of NF-kappaB p65 subunit in cytoplasm. NF-kappaB p65 subunit accumulated in nuclei at the end of SFC and reached its highest level at 30 min after the restoration of the abdominal circulation and decreased gradually during the 6 h after SFC in NS group, while there was little change in DOX group. There was also a slight decrease of IkappaB-alpha at 30 min after the restoration of the abdominal circulation in NS group accompanying with the appearance of phosphorylated IkappaB-alpha. The expression of TNF-alpha was significantly higher in NS group than that in DOX group (average 1.40+/-0.17 vs 0.62+/-0.22, P<0.01) at serial time points after SFC. Serum ALT and AST levels of NS group were higher after 24 h than those of DOX group (93.2+/-7.8 IU/L vs 53.3+/-13.9 IU/L, 217.0+/-29.4 IU/L vs 155.0+/-15.6 IU/L for ALT and AST respectively, P<0.05) and after 48 h than those of DOX group (66.6+/-18.1 IU/L vs 43.3+/-16.7 IU/L, 174.4+/-21.3 IU/L vs 125.7+/-10.5 IU/L for ALT and AST respectively, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Doxorubicin renders the liver to be tolerant to the hepatic influence in SFC in a porcine model through the NF-kappaB/IkappaB-alpha pathway with the expression of HSP72.