Defining the structure-function relationship of specific lesions in early and advanced age-related macular degeneration.

The objective of this study is to define structure-function relationships of pathological lesions related to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using microperimetry and multimodal retinal imaging. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 87 patients with AMD (30 eyes with early and intermediate AMD and 110 eyes with advanced AMD), compared to 33 normal controls (66 eyes) recruited from a single tertiary center. All participants had enface and cross-sectional optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg HRA-2), OCT angiography, color and infra-red (IR) fundus and microperimetry (MP) (Nidek MP-3) performed. Multimodal images were graded for specific AMD pathological lesions. A custom marking tool was used to demarcate lesion boundaries on corresponding enface IR images, and subsequently superimposed onto MP color fundus photographs with retinal sensitivity points (RSP). The resulting overlay was used to correlate pathological structural changes to zonal functional changes. Mean age of patients with early/intermediate AMD, advanced AMD and controls were 73(SD = 8.2), 70.8(SD = 8), and 65.4(SD = 7.7) years respectively. Mean retinal sensitivity (MRS) of both early/intermediate (23.1 dB; SD = 5.5) and advanced AMD (18.1 dB; SD = 7.8) eyes were significantly worse than controls (27.8 dB, SD = 4.3) (p < 0.01). Advanced AMD eyes had significantly more unstable fixation (70%; SD = 63.6), larger mean fixation area (3.9 mm2; SD = 3.0), and focal fixation point further away from the fovea (0.7 mm; SD = 0.8), than controls (29%; SD = 43.9; 2.6 mm2; SD = 1.9; 0.4 mm; SD = 0.3) (p ≤ 0.01). Notably, 22 fellow eyes of AMD eyes (25.7 dB; SD = 3.0), with no AMD lesions, still had lower MRS than controls (p = 0.04). For specific AMD-related lesions, end-stage changes such as fibrosis (5.5 dB, SD = 5.4 dB) and atrophy (6.2 dB, SD = 7.0 dB) had the lowest MRS; while drusen and pigment epithelial detachment (17.7 dB, SD = 8.0 dB) had the highest MRS. Peri-lesional areas (20.2 dB, SD = 7.6 dB) and surrounding structurally normal areas (22.2 dB, SD = 6.9 dB) of the retina with no AMD lesions still had lower MRS compared to controls (27.8 dB, SD = 4.3 dB) (p < 0.01). Our detailed topographic structure-function correlation identified specific AMD pathological changes associated with a poorer visual function. This can provide an added value to the assessment of visual function to optimize treatment outcomes to existing and potentially future novel therapies.

Monocular and Binocular Visual Function Assessments and Activities of Daily Living Performance in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between specific monocular and binocular visual function (VF) assessments with binocularly performed activities of daily living task tests (ADLTTs) in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and healthy controls. DESIGN: Prospective case-control cohort study. SUBJECTS: Thirty-six AMD patients and 36 controls. METHOD: Visual field assessments included monocular and binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and monocular microperimetry testing for mean macula sensitivity, mean retina sensitivity (MRS), fixation area, and fixation distance from fovea (FDF). Age-related macular degeneration lesion area and sensitivity were measured on OCT and microperimetry, respectively. Participants performed 4 validated ADLTTs with binocular BCVA: (1) reading; (2) item-search; (3) money-counting; and (4) multi-step drink-making tasks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spearman correlations and multivariate regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, and potential correlation between the 2 eyes, were used to assess the relationship between monocular and binocular VF assessments, and ADLTT performance in both groups. RESULTS: Age-related macular degeneration patients had poorer VF (BCVA, CS, mean macula sensitivity, and MRS) compared with healthy controls. Monocular BCVA in both better- and worse-vision eyes was moderately correlated with the binocular reading speed and money-counting tasks in participants with AMD. In AMD, monocular worse eye CS, MRS, AMD lesion area on OCT, and lesion sensitivity on microperimetry showed moderate correlations to various ADLTTs, such as reading, money-counting, and drink-making. Similar findings were found in our AMD cohort on multivariate regression analysis. Fewer significant correlations were observed for the better-vision eye, whereas no correlations were observed for healthy controls between VF parameters and ADLTTs. In contrast, significant associations were observed between binocular BCVA and CS with binocular ADLTTs (reading and item-search tasks) but not in AMD patients. CONCLUSION: Although monocular BCVA remains the most common measure of VF, CS and microperimetry testing also show significant correlations with ADLTTs performance in AMD patients, and should be considered as complimentary VF-outcome measures in both clinical and research settings. Unlike healthy subjects, AMD patients do not rely on binocular VF for ADLTT function, with the worse-vision eye impacting binocular ADLTT function more than the better-vision eye. Therefore, the worse-vision eye should not be neglected during the management of AMD. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.