ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Customized birthweight centiles have improved the detection of small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) babies compared to existing population standards. This study used perinatal registry data to derive coefficients for developing customized growth charts for Qatar. METHODS: The PEARL registry data on women delivering in Qatar (2017-2018) was used to develop a multivariable linear regression model predicting optimal birthweight. Physiological variables included gestational age, maternal height, weight, ethnicity, parity, and sex of the baby. Pathological variables such as hypertension, preexisting and gestational diabetes and smoking were calculated and excluded to derive the optimal weight at term. RESULTS: The regression model found a term optimal birthweight of 3,235â¯g for a Qatari nationality mother with median height (159â¯cm), booking weight (72â¯kg), parity (1) and gestation at birth (276 days) at the end of an uncomplicated pregnancy. Constitutional coefficients significantly affecting birthweight were gestational age, height, weight, and parity. The main pathological factors were preexisting diabetes (increase by +175.7â¯g) and smoking (decrease by -190.9â¯g). The SGA and LGA rates in the entire cohort after applying the population-specific customized centiles were 11.1 and 12.2â¯%, respectively (contrasting with the Hadlock standard: SGA-26.3â¯% and LGA-1.8â¯%, and Fenton standard: SGA-12.9â¯% and LGA-4.0â¯%). CONCLUSIONS: Constitutional and pathological variations in fetal growth and birthweight apply in the maternity population in Qatar and have been quantified to allow the generation of customised charts for better identification of pregnancies with abnormal growth. Currently in-use population standards may misdiagnose many SGA and LGA babies.
ABSTRACT
Background: The prevalence of childhood and adult obesity is rising exponentially worldwide. Class IV obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥50 kg/m2) is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study compared these outcomes between women with class IV obesity and women in the normal or overweight categories during pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in Qatar, including women having singleton live births beyond 24 weeks of gestation, classified into two class IV obesity and normal/overweight (BMI between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m2). The outcome measures included the mode of delivery, development of gestational diabetes and hypertension, fetal macrosomia, small for date baby, preterm birth and neonatal morbidity. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: A total of 247 women with class IV obesity were compared with 6797 normal/overweight women. Adjusted analysis showed that women with class IV obesity had 3.2 times higher odds of cesarean delivery (aOR: 3.19, CI: 2.26-4.50), 3.4 times higher odds of gestational diabetes (aOR: 3.39, CI: 2.55-4.50), 4.2 times higher odds of gestational hypertension (aOR: 4.18, CI: 2.45-7.13) and neonatal morbidity (aOR: 4.27, CI: 3.01-6.05), and 6.5 times higher odds of macrosomia (aOR 6.48, CI 4.22-9.99). Conclusions: Class IV obesity is associated with more adverse perinatal outcomes compared with the normal or overweight BMI categories. The study results emphasized the need for specialized antenatal obesity clinics to address the associated risks and reduce complications.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Abnormal body mass index (BMI) during pregnancy, a growing public health concern, increases maternal and neonatal complications. This study aimed to investigate the impact of abnormal BMI on perinatal outcomes compared to normal BMI. METHODS: A total of 14,624 women having singleton births were categorized as underweight (BMI<18.5â¯kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9â¯kg/m2), obesity class I (30.0-34.9â¯kg/m2), obesity class II (35.0-39.9â¯kg/m2), and obesity class III (≥40.0â¯kg/m2) and compared to those with normal BMI (18.5-24.9â¯kg/m2). Outcomes included gestational diabetes (GDM), gestational hypertension (GHT), postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), cesarean delivery (CD), preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), congenital anomalies and neonatal intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: Women with increasing BMI had increasingly higher odds of developing specific adverse outcomes, the highest being in the class III obesity group (GDM-aOR 2.71, 95â¯% CI 2.25-3.27, p<0.001, GHT-aOR 5.32 95â¯% CI 3.49-8.11, p<0.001, CD-aOR 2.33 95â¯% CI 1.85-2.94, p<0.001, PPH-aOR 1.77 95â¯% CI 1.35-2.33, p<0.001). On the other hand, being underweight during pregnancy was associated with increased odds of PTB (aOR 2.09, 95â¯% CI 1.37-3.20, p=0.001), LBW (OR 1.88, 95â¯% CI 1.27-2.79, p=0.002) and congenital anomalies (aOR 2.52 95â¯% CI 1.12-5.64, p=0.025). Majority in the underweight category gained less than expected gestational weight gain during the pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study have important implications for the clinical management of pregnant women with abnormal BMI. Interventions to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes must focus on enhancing pre-pregnancy BMI and maintaining adequate gestational weight gain.
Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational , Gestational Weight Gain , Pregnancy Complications , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Thinness/complications , Thinness/epidemiology , Qatar/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted pregnant women, increasing maternal and neonatal morbidity. The placenta is a potential target for the pathophysiological processes due to the increased thrombotic inflammatory activation and inadequate uteroplacental perfusion and oxygenation, potentially causing intrauterine growth restriction. This study investigates the impact of gestational age at diagnosis of COVID-19 and the presence of symptoms on intrauterine fetal growth in pregnant women. METHODS: A retrospective review of COVID-19 positive pregnant women in Qatar from March 2020 to March 2021 was conducted. They were divided based on trimester of pregnancy in which they were infected. The outcomes included birthweight, customised fetal birthweight centiles, small for gestational age (SGA) baby and daily growth increments, compared between the trimesters and between symptomatic and asymptomatic women. RESULTS: In our cohort, 218 women (20.5%) were infected in the first trimester, 399 (37.5%) in the second and 446 (42%) in the third. Women in the second trimester were significantly younger and symptomatic. Women infected in the first trimester were least likely to have diabetes. The mean birthweight, risk of SGA (11.5% vs 10% vs 14.6%, p = 0.302), and median customized growth centiles (47.6% vs 45.9% vs 46.1%)were similar between the groups. Symptomatic women had significantly lower mean birthweight (3147 gms vs 3222 gms) and median birthweight centiles (43.9% vs 54.0%)compared to the asymptomatic (p<0.05 for both). In women infected within 20 weeks of gestation, a delay in daily fetal growth increments was noted with symptomatic disease, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study shows that women with symptomatic disease had lower birth centiles and birth weights. This was regardless of the gestational age at which they were infected. Early symptomatic disease seems to have an impact on fetal growth velocity; however, larger studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Qatar/epidemiology , Birth Weight , COVID-19/epidemiology , Fetal Development , Gestational AgeABSTRACT
Key Clinical Message: Liver cirrhosis may worsen during pregnancy resulting in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Proper antenatal evaluation, staging, and variceal screening will facilitate the management. Elective endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) during the second trimester can prevent unexpected variceal bleeding. A multidisciplinary approach including the planning of delivery and shared decision-making is recommended for favorable pregnancy outcomes. Abstract: Pregnancy in women with liver cirrhosis is relatively uncommon. During pregnancy, liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension may worsen significantly, placing both the mother and fetus at an increased risk of serious morbidity and life-threatening events. With the use of a wide variety of diagnostic tools and considerably improved treatment strategies, many women with liver disease in pregnancies are being diagnosed with significantly improved obstetric outcomes. We present a case of a 33-year-old lady with a previous medical history of cryptogenic chronic liver disease and schistosomiasis associated with periportal fibrosis, portal hypertension, splenomegaly, and pancytopenia. The mother presented to our tertiary care center at 18 weeks of gestation. She had EVL twice during the second trimester. With multidisciplinary care and follow-up, she labored spontaneously and was discharged home on third postnatal day.
ABSTRACT
Evidence-based treatment involving multidisciplinary decision making is warranted to treat COVID-19 in pregnancy. This case presents the management of a critically ill pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of emergency cervical cerclage and to determine predictors of failure or success in women with cervical incompetence. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for clinical and demographic data, gestational age at time of cerclage, cerclage-delivery interval, gestational age at time of delivery; and birth weight. Predictors of success and failure were analyzed. RESULT: Forty-three pregnant women between 18 and 25 weeks of gestation were recruited. The mean gestational age at time of cerclage was 21 weeks. The mean cerclage-delivery interval was 64 days. The mean gestation at delivery was 31 weeks and the mean neonatal birth weight was 2166 g. Whether cerclage done before or after 20 weeks, the difference in cerclage-delivery interval was insignificant while the difference in gestational age at time of delivery and neonatal birth weight was significant. Presence of infection, presence of symptoms, membranes through the cervix and dilated cervix >3 cm are frequently associated with failure. CONCLUSION: Emergency cervical cerclage is effective in prolonging pregnancy and improving neonatal outcome in patient with cervical incompetence. However, large prospective randomized controlled studies are recommended.
Subject(s)
Cerclage, Cervical/adverse effects , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/surgery , Adult , Cerclage, Cervical/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second/physiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Incompetence/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of 4-D ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal neurobehavior and in prediction of adverse neurological outcome. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Women Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. POPULATION: Forty pregnant women between 20 and 38 weeks of gestation with high risk for neurological abnormalities and 40 low risk cases were included. METHODS: Prenatal fetal neurological assessment using Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test (KANET). Postnatal neurological assessment was performed using Amiel-Tison's neurological assessment at term (ATNAT) for all live-borns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction of fetuses at neurological risk. RESULTS: The difference in the range of KANET score was significant. A significant difference was shown for isolated head anteflexion, isolated eye blinking, facial expressions, mouth movements, isolated hand movements, hand to face movement, finger movements, and general movements. For isolated leg movement and cranial sutures, the difference was not significant. All cases with abnormal KANET proved to be abnormal postnatally. CONCLUSION: 4-D ultrasonography may have an important role in prenatal assessment of fetal neurobehavior and prediction of adverse neurological outcome. However, further large studies are recommended before the test could be recommended for wider clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Nervous System Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Neurologic Examination , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: An evolving challenge for obstetrician is to better define normal and abnormal fetal neurological function in utero in order to better predict antenatally which fetuses are at risk for adverse neurological outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prenatal neurological assessment in high-risk fetuses using four-dimensional ultrasound applying the recently developed Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test (KANET). Postnatal neurological assessment was performed using Amiel Tison's neurological assessment at term (ATNAT) for all live-borns and general movement (GM) assessment for those with borderline and abnormal ATNAT. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 288 pregnant women in four centers of whom 266 gave birth to a live-born baby. It was revealed that 234 fetuses were neurologically normal, 7 abnormal and 25 borderline. Out of 7 abnormal fetuses ATNAT was borderline in 5 and abnormal in 2, whereas GM assessment was abnormal in 5 and definitely abnormal in 2. Out of 25 KANET borderline fetuses, ATNAT was normal in 7, borderline in 17 and abnormal in 1, whereas the GM assessment was as follows: normal optimal in 4, normal suboptimal in 20, and abnormal in 1. In summary, out of 32 borderline and abnormal fetuses ATNAT was normal in 7, borderline in 22 and abnormal in 3; GM assessment was normal optimal in 4, normal suboptimal in 20, abnormal in 6 and definitely abnormal in 2. CONCLUSION: The sonographic test requires further studies before being recommended for wider clinical practice.