Is Radiographic Osteoporotic Hip Morphology A Predictor For High Mortality Following Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures?: Osteoporotic Hip Morphology & Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Factors related to mortality after intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF) have been investigated intensively in the literature except for radiographic osteoporotic hip morphology. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between mortality and radiographic osteoporotic hip morphology of patients with ITFF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery between the dates of January 2012 and June 2018 due to ITFF were retrospectively reviewed. Osteoporotic status of the proximal femur was determined based on Singh Index grading and Dorr classification systems on preoperative anteroposterior pelvis radiographs of contralateral hips. The mortality rates of the patients were measured at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months. For controlling the confounders, multiple regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 321 consecutive ITFFs were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 81.5 ± 6.6 years. All patients were treated with osteosynthesis utilizing a cephalomedullary nail. The overall mortality rates at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were 7.2%, 13.4%, 16.2%, 22.7%, respectively. There was 2.196 (1.140 - 4.229) folds increase in the mortality rate of patients with the Dorr type C femurs at 6th month (p=0.019). However, Singh index grade was not significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with Dorr type C femur seem to have 2.1 times increased mortality at 6th months following ITFFs. A simple anteroposterior pelvis radiograph obtained during the initial evaluation of the patients may be used to estimate the mortality rate after ITFF.

Dynamic and Stabilometric Analysis After Syndesmosis Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis contributes to dynamic stability of the ankle joint and thereby affects gait cycle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the grade of syndesmosis injury on plantar pressure distribution and dynamic parameters of the foot. METHODS: Grade of syndesmosis injury was determined by preoperative plain radiographic evaluation, intraoperative hook test, or external rotation stress test under fluoroscopic examination, and two groups were created: group 1, patients with grade III syndesmosis injury (n = 17); and group 2, patients with grade II syndesmosis injury (n = 10). At the last visit, radiologic and clinical assessment using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score was performed. Dynamic and stabilometric analysis was carried out at least 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48.9 years (range, 17-80 years), and the mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 12-24 months). No statistically significant difference was noted between two groups regarding Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. The comparison of stabilometric and dynamic analysis revealed no significant difference between grade II and grade III injuries (P > .05). However, comparison of the data of patients with grade III syndesmosis injury between injured and healthy feet showed a significant difference for dynamic maximum and mean pressures (P = .035 and P = .49, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Syndesmosis injury does not affect stance phase but affects the gait cycle by generating increased pressures on the uninjured foot and decreased pressures on the injured foot. With the help of pedobarography, processing suitable orthopedic insoles for the injured foot and interceptive measures for overloading of the normal foot may prevent later consequences of ankle trauma.