Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 215(3): 370.e1-6, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26996988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal screening has become an increasingly prevalent choice for women who desire aneuploidy screening. Although the test characteristics are impressive, some women are at increased risk for noninvasive prenatal screen failure. The risk of test failure increases with maternal weight; thus, obese women may be at elevated risk for failure. This risk of failure may be mitigated by the addition of a paternal cheek swab and screening at a later gestational age. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association among obesity, gestational age, and paternal cheek swab in the prevention of screening failure. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed for women who were ≥35 years old at delivery who underwent screening at NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL. Maternal weight, body mass index, gestational age, and a paternal cheek swab were evaluated in univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to assess the association with failed screening. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-five women met inclusion criteria for our study. The mean body mass index was 25.9 ± 5.1 kg/m(2); 111 women (20%) were obese (body mass index, ≥30 kg/m(2)). Forty-four women (7.8%) had a failed screen. Obese women had a failure rate of 24.3% compared with 3.8% in nonobese women (P < .01). Gestational age was not associated with failure rate (mean ± standard deviation, 13 ± 3 weeks for both screen failure and nonfailure; P = .76). The addition of a paternal cheek swab reduced the failure rate from 10.2% in women with no swab to 3.8% in women with a swab (P < .01). In multivariable analysis, obesity and lack of a paternal cheek swab were independent predictors of screen failure (odds ratio, 9.75; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-19.61; P < .01; and odds ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-8.33; P < .01, respectively). CONCLUSION: The addition of a paternal cheek swab significantly improved noninvasive prenatal screen success rates in obese women. However, delaying testing to a later gestational age did not.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , DNA/blood , Obesity/complications , Prenatal Diagnosis/adverse effects , Adult , Body Mass Index , Cohort Studies , Fathers , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Male , Mouth Mucosa/cytology , Multivariate Analysis , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
2.
Mutagenesis ; 17(4): 345-52, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12110632

ABSTRACT

Cumulative exposure to oestrogen has been linked to increased risk of breast cancer. Whilst oestrogens induce cancers in rodent bioassays it is unclear whether the mechanisms involved are genotoxic and/or epigenetic. The cytokinesis block micronucleus (CBMN) and the alkaline single cell-gel electrophoresis 'Comet' assays were used to examine MCF-7 cells for chromosomal damage and DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), respectively. The comet-forming activities of oestrogens were also tested in a 72 h primary culture of cells isolated from freshly expressed breast milk. Micronuclei (MN) were scored in 500 binucleate cells per treatment and SSBs were quantified by comet tail length (CTL) (microm). Effects on mitotic rate (per cent binucleate cells) and cell viability (per cent plating efficiency) were also assessed. beta-Oestradiol, oestrone and oestriol were tested for genotoxicity in the 10(-10)-10(-4) M and 10(-10)-10(-2) M concentration ranges in the CBMN and Comet assays, respectively. Beta-Oestradiol, following 24 h treatment but not 120 h treatment, induced increases (up to 3-fold) in MN at a concentration of 10(-9) M. Oestrone induced dose-related increases in MN (up to 5-fold) following both 24 and 120 h treatment, whereas oestriol appeared not to induce MN. All three oestrogens induced dose-related increases in per cent binucleate cells suggesting that they enhance mitotic rate. In the Comet assay both beta-oestradiol and oestrone induced dose-related increases in SSBs (up to 7-fold over control CTL) and were significantly comet-forming (P < 0.0001) at concentrations as low as 10(-9) and 10(-8) M, respectively, whereas oestriol was less genotoxic. All three oestrogens were significantly comet-forming (P < 0.0001) in a primary culture of breast milk cells, suggesting that they can damage the target cells from which breast cancers may eventually arise.


Subject(s)
Breast/cytology , Estrogens/toxicity , Adult , Breast/drug effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Carcinoma/genetics , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cells, Cultured , Comet Assay , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Estradiol/toxicity , Estriol/toxicity , Estrone/toxicity , Female , Humans , Micronucleus Tests , Milk, Human/cytology , Milk, Human/drug effects , Mitosis/drug effects , Mutagens/toxicity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...