Evaluating genetic ancestry and self-reported ethnicity in the context of carrier screening.

BACKGROUND: Current professional society guidelines recommend genetic carrier screening be offered on the basis of ethnicity, or when using expanded carrier screening panels, they recommend to compute residual risk based on ethnicity. We investigated the reliability of self-reported ethnicity in 9138 subjects referred to carrier screening. Self-reported ethnicity gathered from test requisition forms and during post-test genetic counseling, and genetic ancestry predicted by a statistical model, were compared for concordance. RESULTS: We identified several discrepancies between the two sources of self-reported ethnicity and genetic ancestry. Only 30.3% of individuals who indicated Mediterranean ancestry during consultation self-reported this on requisition forms. Additionally, the proportion of individuals who reported Southeast Asian but were estimated to have a different genetic ancestry was found to depend on the source of self-report. Finally, individuals who reported Latin American demonstrated a high degree of ancestral admixture. As a result, carrier rates and residual risks provided for patient decision-making are impacted if using self-reported ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlights the unreliability of ethnicity classification based on patient self-reports. We recommend the routine use of pan-ethnic carrier screening panels in reproductive medicine. Furthermore, the use of an ancestry model would allow better estimation of carrier rates and residual risks.

Validation of a multiplex genotyping platform using a novel genomic database approach.

PURPOSE: Technological advances now allow for multiplex platforms to simultaneously test many genetic conditions. Typically, such platforms are validated by assaying samples with known genotypes and/or phenotypes and/or with synthetic plasmids; however, these methods have limitations and with the inclusion of rarer diseases and mutations, we can no longer rely solely on them. We used a novel genomic database to validate an expanded genetic carrier screening platform. METHODS: Our expanded carrier screening assay uses the Illumina Infinium iSelect HD Custom genotyping platform to test for 213 genetic diseases by assaying 1,663 pathogenic mutations. We leveraged two Coriell Institute biorepositories for validation: the Subcollection of Heritable Diseases and the 1000 Genomes Project. RESULTS: We measured 12,394 mutation observations in 206 samples, resulting in 246 true positives, 12,147 true negatives, 1 false positive, and no false negatives. Results demonstrated high sensitivity (99.99%) and specificity (99.99%). CONCLUSION: We successfully validated our platform with two biorepositories, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity. The 1000 Genomes Project samples provided both positive and negative validation for mutations in genes not available through other biorepositories, expanding the depth of validated variants. We recommend including samples from the 1000 Genomes Project in the validation of future multiplex testing platforms.Genet Med advance online publication 30 July 2015Genetics in Medicine (2015); doi:10.1038/gim.2015.101.