Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Joint J ; 97-B(8): 1046-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26224819

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to determine the functional impact and financial burden of isolated and recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our secondary goal was to determine whether there was a difference between patients who were treated non-operatively and those who were treated operatively. We retrospectively reviewed 71 patients who had suffered dislocation of a primary THA. Their mean age was 67 years (41 to 92) and the mean follow-up was 3.8 years (2.1 to 8.2). Because patients with recurrent dislocation were three times more likely to undergo operative treatment (p < 0.0001), they ultimately had a significantly higher mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) (p = 0.0001), lower mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (p = 0.001) and a higher mean SF-12 score (p < 0.0001) than patients with a single dislocation. Likewise, those who underwent operative treatment had a higher mean HHS (p < 0.0001), lower mean WOMAC score (p < 0.0001) and a higher mean SF-12 score (p < 0.0001) than those who were treated non-operatively. Recurrent dislocation and operative treatment increased costs by 300% (£11 456; p < 0.0001) and 40% (£5217; p < 0.0001), respectively. The operative treatment of recurrent dislocation results in significantly better function than non-operative management. Moreover, the increase in costs for operative treatment is modest compared with that of non-operative measures.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Hip Dislocation/economics , Hip Dislocation/therapy , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies
2.
Bone Joint J ; 96-B(11 Supple A): 48-55, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25381408

ABSTRACT

We are currently facing an epidemic of periprosthetic fractures around the hip. They may occur either during surgery or post-operatively. Although the acetabulum may be involved, the femur is most commonly affected. We are being presented with new, difficult fracture patterns around cemented and cementless implants, and we face the challenge of an elderly population who may have grossly deficient bone and may struggle to rehabilitate after such injuries. The correct surgical management of these fractures is challenging. This article will review the current choices of implants and techniques available to deal with periprosthetic fractures of the femur.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Femoral Fractures/epidemiology , Periprosthetic Fractures/epidemiology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Global Health , Humans , Incidence , Periprosthetic Fractures/surgery , Reoperation , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...