The Molecular Mechanisms Governing the Assembly of the Immuno- and Thymoproteasomes in the Presence of Constitutive Proteasomes.

The proteasome is a large protein complex responsible for proteolysis in cells. Though the proteasome is widely conserved in all eukaryotes, vertebrates additionally possess tissue-specific proteasomes, termed immunoproteasomes and thymoproteasomes. These specialized proteasomes diverge from constitutive proteasomes in the makeup of their catalytic 20S core particle (CP), whereby the constitutive ß1, ß2, and ß5 catalytic subunits are replaced by ß1i, ß2i, and ß5i in immunoproteasomes, or ß1i, ß2i, and ß5t in thymoproteasomes. However, as constitutive ß1, ß2, and ß5 are also present in tissues and cells expressing immuno- and thymoproteasomes, the specialized proteasomes must be able to selectively incorporate their specific subunits. Here, we review the mechanisms governing the assembly of constitutive and specialized proteasomes elucidated thus far. Studies have revealed that ß1i and ß2i are added onto the α-ring of the CP prior to the other ß subunits. Furthermore, ß5i and ß5t can be incorporated independent of ß4, whereas constitutive ß5 incorporation is dependent on ß4. These mechanisms allow the immuno- and thymoproteasomes to integrate tissue-specific ß-subunits without contamination from constitutive ß1, ß2, and ß5. We end the review with a brief discussion on the diseases caused by mutations to the immunoproteasome and the proteins involved with its assembly.

The ubiquitination-deubiquitination cycle on the ribosomal protein eS7A is crucial for efficient translation.

Ubiquitination is a major post-translational modification of ribosomal proteins. The role of ubiquitination in the regulation of ribosome functions is still being elucidated. However, the importance of ribosome deubiquitination remains unclear. Here, we show that the cycle of ubiquitination and deubiquitination of the 40S ribosome subunit eS7 is important for efficient translation. eS7 ubiquitination at lysine 83 is required for efficient protein translation. We identified Otu2 and Ubp3 as the deubiquitinating enzymes for eS7. An otu2Δubp3Δ mutation caused a defect in protein synthesis. Ubp3 inhibited polyubiquitination of eS7 in polysomes to keep eS7 in a mono-ubiquitinated form, whereas Otu2 was specifically bound to the free 40S ribosome and promoted the dissociation of mRNAs from 40S ribosomes in the recycling step. Our results provide clues for understanding the molecular mechanism of the translation system via a ubiquitination-deubiquitination cycle.

In-depth Analysis of the Lid Subunits Assembly Mechanism in Mammals.

The 26S proteasome is a key player in the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins, comprising a 20S core particle (CP) and a 19S regulatory particle (RP). The RP is further divided into base and lid subcomplexes, which are assembled independently from each other. We have previously demonstrated the assembly pathway of the CP and the base by observing assembly intermediates resulting from knockdowns of each proteasome subunit and the assembly chaperones. In this study, we examine the assembly pathway of the mammalian lid, which remains to be elucidated. We show that the lid assembly pathway is conserved between humans and yeast. The final step is the incorporation of Rpn12 into the assembly intermediate consisting of two modular complexes, Rpn3-7-15 and Rpn5-6-8-9-11, in both humans and yeast. Furthermore, we dissect the assembly pathways of the two modular complexes by the knockdown of each lid subunit.

PAC1-PAC2 proteasome assembly chaperone retains the core α4-α7 assembly intermediates in the cytoplasm.

The proteasome core particle (CP) is a cytoplasmic and nuclear protease complex and is comprised of two α-rings and two ß-rings stacked in order of αßßα. The assembly of CP proceeds by ordered recruitment of ß-subunits on an α-ring with help of assembly chaperones PAC1-PAC2, PAC3-PAC4, and UMP1. However, the mechanism of α-ring formation remains unsolved. Here, we show that α4, α5, α6, and α7 form a core intermediate as the initial process of α-ring assembly, which requires PAC3-PAC4. α1 and α3 can be incorporated independently into the core α4-α7 intermediate, whereas α2 incorporation is dependent on preceding incorporation of α1. Through these processes, PAC1-PAC2 prevents nonproductive dimerization of α-ring assembly intermediates. We also found that PAC1-PAC2 overrides the effect of nuclear localization signals of α-subunits and retains α-ring assembly intermediates in the cytoplasm. Our results first show a detailed assembly pathway of proteasomal α-ring and explain the mechanism by which CP assembly occurs in the cytoplasm.

The aspartyl protease DDI2 activates Nrf1 to compensate for proteasome dysfunction.

In response to proteasome dysfunction, mammalian cells upregulate proteasome gene expression by activating Nrf1. Nrf1 is an endoplasmic reticulum-resident transcription factor that is continually retrotranslocated and degraded by the proteasome. Upon proteasome inhibition, Nrf1 escapes degradation and is cleaved to become active. However, the processing enzyme for Nrf1 remains obscure. Here we show that the aspartyl protease DNA-damage inducible 1 homolog 2 (DDI2) is required to cleave and activate Nrf1. Deletion of DDI2 reduced the cleaved form of Nrf1 and increased the full-length cytosolic form of Nrf1, resulting in poor upregulation of proteasomes in response to proteasome inhibition. These defects were restored by adding back wild-type DDI2 but not protease-defective DDI2. Our results provide a clue for blocking compensatory proteasome synthesis to improve cancer therapies targeting proteasomes.

Proteasome Impairment Induces Recovery of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and an Alternative Pathway of Mitochondrial Fusion.

Mitochondria are vital and highly dynamic organelles that continuously fuse and divide to maintain mitochondrial quality. Mitochondrial dysfunction impairs cellular integrity and is known to be associated with various human diseases. However, the mechanism by which the quality of mitochondria is maintained remains largely unexplored. Here we show that impaired proteasome function recovers the growth of yeast cells lacking Fzo1, a pivotal protein for mitochondrial fusion. Decreased proteasome activity increased the mitochondrial oxidoreductase protein Mia40 and the ratio of the short isoform of mitochondrial intermembrane protein Mgm1 (s-Mgm1) to the long isoform (l-Mgm1). The increase in Mia40 restored mitochondrial membrane potential, while the increase in the s-Mgm1/l-Mgm1 ratio promoted mitochondrial fusion in an Fzo1-independent manner. Our findings demonstrate a new pathway for mitochondrial quality control that is induced by proteasome impairment.

Sirt1-deficiency causes defective protein quality control.

Protein quality control is an important mechanism to maintain cellular homeostasis. Damaged proteins have to be restored or eliminated by degradation, which is mainly achieved by molecular chaperones and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase Sirt1 has been reported to play positive roles in the regulation of cellular homeostasis in response to various stresses. However, its contribution to protein quality control remains unexplored. Here we show that Sirt1 is involved in protein quality control in both an Hsp70-dependent and an Hsp70-independent manner. Loss of Sirt1 led to the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins in cells and tissues, especially upon heat stress, without affecting proteasome activities. This was partly due to decreased basal expression of Hsp70. However, this accumulation was only partially alleviated by overexpression of Hsp70 or induction of Hsp70 upon heat shock in Sirt1-deficient cells and tissues. These results suggest that Sirt1 mediates both Hsp70-dependent and Hsp70-independent protein quality control. Our findings cast new light on understanding the role of Sirt1 in maintaining cellular homeostasis.

Identification of minimum Rpn4-responsive elements in genes related to proteasome functions.

The proteasome is an essential, 66-subunit protease that mediates ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. The transcription factor Rpn4 regulates concerted expression of proteasome subunits to increase the proteasome by recognizing nonamer proteasome-associated control element (PACE) elements on the promoter regions. However, the genes for proteasome assembly chaperones and some of the subunits have no PACEs. Here we identified a minimal hexamer "PACE-core" sequence that responds to Rpn4. PACE-cores are found in many genes related to proteasome function including the assembly chaperones, but cannot substitute for PACE of the subunits. Our results add a new layer of complexity in transcriptional regulation of genes involved in protein degradation.

N-terminal α7 deletion of the proteasome 20S core particle substitutes for yeast PI31 function.

The proteasome core particle (CP) is a conserved protease complex that is formed by the stacking of two outer α-rings and two inner ß-rings. The α-ring is a heteroheptameric ring of subunits α1 to α7 and acts as a gate that restricts entry of substrate proteins into the catalytic cavity formed by the two abutting ß-rings. The 31-kDa proteasome inhibitor (PI31) was originally identified as a protein that binds to the CP and inhibits CP activity in vitro, but accumulating evidence indicates that PI31 is required for physiological proteasome activity. To clarify the in vivo role of PI31, we examined the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PI31 ortholog Fub1. Fub1 was essential in a situation where the CP assembly chaperone Pba4 was deleted. The lethality of Δfub1 Δpba4 was suppressed by deletion of the N terminus of α7 (α7ΔN), which led to the partial activation of the CP. However, deletion of the N terminus of α3, which activates the CP more efficiently than α7ΔN by gate opening, did not suppress Δfub1 Δpba4 lethality. These results suggest that the α7 N terminus has a role in CP activation different from that of the α3 N terminus and that the role of Fub1 antagonizes a specific function of the α7 N terminus.

Assembly mechanisms of specialized core particles of the proteasome.

The 26S proteasome has a highly complicated structure comprising the 20S core particle (CP) and the 19S regulatory particle (RP). Along with the standard CP in all eukaryotes, vertebrates have two more subtypes of CP called the immunoproteasome and the thymoproteasome. The immunoproteasome has catalytic subunits ß1i, ß2i, and ß5i replacing ß1, ß2, and ß5 and enhances production of major histocompatibility complex I ligands. The thymoproteasome contains thymus-specific subunit ß5t in place of ß5 or ß5i and plays a pivotal role in positive selection of CD8+ T cells. Here we investigate the assembly pathways of the specialized CPs and show that ß1i and ß2i are incorporated ahead of all the other ß-subunits and that both ß5i and ß5t can be incorporated immediately after the assembly of ß3 in the absence of ß4, distinct from the assembly of the standard CP in which ß-subunits are incorporated in the order of ß2, ß3, ß4, ß5, ß6, ß1, and ß7. The propeptide of ß5t is a key factor for this earlier incorporation, whereas the body sequence seems to be important for the earlier incorporation of ß5i. This unique feature of ß5t and ß5i may account for preferential assembly of the immunoproteasome and the thymoproteasome over the standard type even when both the standard and specialized subunits are co-expressed.

Pba3-Pba4 heterodimer acts as a molecular matchmaker in proteasome α-ring formation.

Eukaryotic proteasome assembly is assisted by multiple dedicated chaperones. In yeast, formation of the heteroheptameric ring composed of α1-α7 subunits is promoted by the heterodimeric chaperone Pba3-Pba4. Here we reveal that in the absence of this dimeric chaperone, α2 replaces α4 during α-ring assembly, thereby giving rise to a non-productive complex that lacks α4, ß1, ß5, ß6, and ß7 subunits and aggregates of α4. Furthermore, our structure-guided mutational data demonstrate that the Pba3-Pba4 heterodimer acts as molecular matchmaker reinforcing the interaction between α4 and α5, which is the crucial step in the α-ring formation.

The mechanism for molecular assembly of the proteasome.

In eukaryotic cells, the ubiquitin proteasome system plays important roles in diverse cellular processes. The 26S proteasome is a large enzyme complex that degrades ubiquitinated proteins. It consists of 33 different subunits that form two subcomplexes, the 20S core particle and the 19S regulatory particle. Recently, several chaperones dedicated to the accurate assembly of this protease complex have been identified, but the complete mechanism of the 26S proteasome assembly is still unclear. In this review, we summarize what is known about the assembly of proteasome to date and present our group's recent findings on the role of the GET pathway in the assembly of the 26S proteasome, in addition to its role in mediating the insertion of tail-anchored (TA) proteins into the ER membrane.

Involvement of Bag6 and the TRC pathway in proteasome assembly.

The 26S proteasome has an elaborate structure, consisting of 33 different subunits that form the 20S core particle capped by the 19S regulatory particle on either end. Several chaperones that are dedicated to the accurate assembly of this protease complex have been identified, but the mechanisms underlying proteasome biogenesis remain unexplored so far. Here we report that core particle assembly becomes less efficient if the TRC pathway, which mediates insertion of tail-anchored proteins, is defective. We demonstrate that Bag6, a protein in the TRC pathway that is also responsible for the degradation of mislocalized proteins, is not only involved in core particle assembly but also has a key role in efficient regulatory particle assembly by directly associating with precursor regulatory particles. These findings indicate that proteasome assembly is not solely mediated by dedicated chaperones but also depends on general chaperones that preserve protein homeostasis.

An inhibitor of a deubiquitinating enzyme regulates ubiquitin homeostasis.

The dynamic and reversible process of ubiquitin modification controls various cellular activities. Ubiquitin exists as monomers, unanchored chains, or protein-conjugated forms, but the regulation of these interconversions remains largely unknown. Here, we identified a protein designated Rfu1 (regulator of free ubiquitin chains 1), which regulates intracellular concentrations of monomeric ubiquitins and free ubiquitin chains in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rfu1 functions as an inhibitor of Doa4, a deubiquitinating enzyme. Rapid loss of free ubiquitin chains upon heat shock, a condition in which more proteins require ubiquitin conjugation, was mediated in part by Doa4 and Rfu1. Thus, regulation of ubiquitin homeostasis is controlled by a balance between a deubiquitinating enzyme and its inhibitor. We propose that free ubiquitin chains function as a ubiquitin reservoir that allows maintenance of monomeric ubiquitins at adequate levels under normal conditions and rapid supply for substrate conjugation under stress conditions.

Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly.

The 26S proteasome is a highly conserved protein degradation machine that consists of the 20S proteasome and 19S regulatory particles, which include 14 and 19 different polypeptides, respectively. How the proteasome components are assembled is a fundamental question towards understanding the process of protein degradation and its functions in diverse biological processes. Several proteasome-dedicated chaperones are involved in the efficient and correct assembly of the 20S proteasome. These chaperones help the initiation and progression of the assembly process by transiently associating with proteasome precursors. By contrast, little is known about the assembly of the 19S regulatory particles, but several hints have emerged.

Dissecting beta-ring assembly pathway of the mammalian 20S proteasome.

The 20S proteasome is the catalytic core of the 26S proteasome. It comprises four stacked rings of seven subunits each, alpha(1-7)beta(1-7)beta(1-7)alpha(1-7). Recent studies indicated that proteasome-specific chaperones and beta-subunit appendages assist in the formation of alpha-rings and dimerization of half-proteasomes, but the process involved in the assembly of beta-rings is poorly understood. Here, we clarify the mechanism of beta-ring formation on alpha-rings by characterizing assembly intermediates accumulated in cells depleted of each beta-subunit. Starting from beta2, incorporation of beta-subunits occurs in an orderly manner dependent on the propeptides of beta2 and beta5, and the C-terminal tail of beta2. Unexpectedly, hUmp1, a chaperone functioning at the final assembly step, is incorporated as early as beta2 and is required for the structural integrity of early assembly intermediates. We propose a model in which beta-ring formation is assisted by both intramolecular and extrinsic chaperones, whose roles are partially different between yeast and mammals.

Crystal structure of a chaperone complex that contributes to the assembly of yeast 20S proteasomes.

Eukaryotic 20S proteasomes are composed of two alpha-rings and two beta-rings, which form an alphabetabetaalpha stacked structure. Here we describe a proteasome-specific chaperone complex, designated Dmp1-Dmp2, in budding yeast. Dmp1-Dmp2 directly bound to the alpha5 subunit to facilitate alpha-ring formation. In Deltadmp1 cells, alpha-rings lacking alpha4 and decreased formation of 20S proteasomes were observed. Dmp1-Dmp2 interacted with proteasome precursors early during proteasome assembly and dissociated from the precursors before the formation of half-proteasomes. Notably, the crystallographic structures of Dmp1 and Dmp2 closely resemble that of PAC3-a mammalian proteasome-assembling chaperone; nonetheless, neither Dmp1 nor Dmp2 showed obvious sequence similarity to PAC3. The structure of the Dmp1-Dmp2-alpha5 complex reveals how this chaperone functions in proteasome assembly and why it dissociates from proteasome precursors before the beta-rings are assembled.

The assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the yeast 26S proteasome.

The 26S proteasome consists of the 20S proteasome (core particle) and the 19S regulatory particle made of the base and lid substructures, and it is mainly localized in the nucleus in yeast. To examine how and where this huge enzyme complex is assembled, we performed biochemical and microscopic characterization of proteasomes produced in two lid mutants, rpn5-1 and rpn7-3, and a base mutant DeltaN rpn2, of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that, although lid formation was abolished in rpn5-1 mutant cells at the restrictive temperature, an apparently intact base was produced and localized in the nucleus. In contrast, in DeltaN rpn2 cells, a free lid was formed and localized in the nucleus even at the restrictive temperature. These results indicate that the modules of the 26S proteasome, namely, the core particle, base, and lid, can be formed and imported into the nucleus independently of each other. Based on these observations, we propose a model for the assembly process of the yeast 26S proteasome.

A novel proteasome interacting protein recruits the deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 to 26S proteasomes.

The 26S proteasome is a multisubunit protease responsible for regulated proteolysis in eukaryotic cells. It is composed of one catalytic 20S proteasome and two 19S regulatory particles attached on both ends of 20S proteasomes. Here, we describe the identification of Adrm1 as a novel proteasome interacting protein in mammalian cells. Although the overall sequence of Adrm1 has weak homology with the yeast Rpn13, the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions exhibit significant homology. Therefore, we designated it as hRpn13. hRpn13 interacts with a base subunit Rpn2 via its amino-terminus. The majority of 26S proteasomes contain hRpn13, but a portion of them does not, indicating that hRpn13 is not an integral subunit. Intriguingly, we found that hRpn13 recruits UCH37, a deubiquitinating enzyme known to associate with 26 proteasomes. The carboxyl-terminal regions containing KEKE motifs of both hRpn13 and UCH37 are involved in their physical interaction. Knockdown of hRpn13 caused no obvious proteolytic defect but loss of UCH37 proteins and decrease in deubiquitinating activity of 26S proteasomes. Our results indicate that hRpn13 is essential for the activity of UCH37.