A Multi-Topic Bystander Intervention Program for Upper-Level Undergraduate Students: Outcomes in Sexual Violence, Racism, and High-Risk Alcohol Situations.

Few bystander intervention trainings programs have evaluated behavioral outcomes in previously trained upper-level undergraduate students. Rigorous study designs are necessary to understand how multi-topic programs influence student outcomes to intervene against sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations. A single-session bystander training for emphasizing communication strategies was developed for juniors and seniors on a private, Midwestern college campus. The training addressed sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations and was evaluated using a randomized waitlist-control design in student-housing units. Online Qualtrics surveys were completed by 101 student participants (57 in the intervention group and 44 in the control group). Students responded to nine harm scenarios involving sexual violence, racism, and high-risk alcohol situations at baseline and 7 weeks follow-up. Between-group changes in scores were compared to determine the effect of the program on students' (a) readiness to intervene; (b) confidence to intervene; (c) bystander behaviors among students who witnessed actual or potentially harmful events; and (d) bystander reports of their experiences. Qualitative analysis assessed how the program influenced the use of positive verbal communication strategies. Program effects increased positive bystander experiences when helping someone who had too much to drink and needed assistance. Over time both groups reported increased confidence levels to intervene when someone intoxicated was being isolated with sexual intent. There were no further significant findings in readiness, confidence, behaviors, or other experiences, though some positive nonsignificant trends emerged. The program demonstrated little efficacy. Results suggest opportunities to improve bystander outcomes in low-risk primary prevention situations and racist scenarios, suggesting that targeted intervention of these outcomes may be useful when developing programming with previously-trained students. As universities expand prevention work beyond the first year, lessons learned may help inform multi-year programming across health topics to prevent harm and create healthier college campuses.

Hospital-based inpatient quality improvement initiatives on safe infant sleep: Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

This review aimed to better understand the application of Quality Improvement (QI) processes to increase adherence to safe infant sleep recommendations in inpatient hospital settings. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we searched MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for articles published between 1992 and 2021 describing safe infant sleep QI processes in inpatient settings. Data were extracted from eligible articles based on the hospital setting, intervention target, and QI elements in addition to QI improvement efforts. Article quality was assessed using Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) criteria. The initial search yielded 331 articles; 27 met eligibility criteria for data extraction. QI was conducted in pediatric, maternity, and neonatal intensive care units, or a combination. The most often targeted practices were supine position and no objects in crib, followed by parent teaching, sleep location, flat surface, and appropriate bundling. Change approaches fit four broad categories: staff education, parent education, policy, and unit environment changes. All articles reported at least partial success in increasing adherence, and the "lessons learned" can assist hospital teams in tailoring their own safe sleep QI process.

Home Visiting Effects on Breastfeeding and Bedsharing in a Low-Income Sample.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that home visiting interventions can promote breastfeeding initiation, though their effects on breastfeeding continuation are unclear. No known studies have assessed the impact of home visiting on bedsharing. AIMS: To test the effects of home visiting on breastfeeding and bedsharing in a low-income, urban sample in the United States. METHODS: During a field trial conducted in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, from April 2014 to March 2017, referrals to a public health department were randomized to a Healthy Families America (HFA) program or a prenatal care and coordination (PNCC) program. Of the 204 women who accepted services, 139 consented to the study and were allocated to the two treatment groups, which were compared with each other and a third quasi-experimental group of 100 women who did not accept services. Data were collected at four time points up to 12 months postpartum. RESULTS: Breastfeeding initiation was higher among 72 HFA participants (88.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.7) and 67 PNCC participants (88.5%; OR = 2.2) than 100 comparison participants (76.5%). Similar results emerged for breastfeeding duration, though group differences were not statistically significant. Unexpectedly, bedsharing prevalence was higher among HFA participants (56.5%) than PNCC participants (31.1%; OR = 2.9) and comparison group participants (38.8%; OR = 2.0). DISCUSSION: Home visiting was linked to increased breastfeeding, while effects on bedsharing varied by program. Progress toward precision home visiting will be advanced by identifying program components that promote breastfeeding and safe sleep. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to examine whether home visiting reduces disparities in breastfeeding and safe sleep practices.