Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 72(2): 174-180, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153964

ABSTRACT

High myopia is often associated with local ectasia and scleral thinning. The progression of myopia depends upon scleral biochemical and biomechanical properties. Scleral thinning is associated with decreased collagen fiber diameter, defective collagen fibrillogenesis, and collagen cross-linking. Reversing these abnormalities may make the sclera tougher and might serve as a treatment option for myopic progression. Collagen cross-linking is a natural process in the cornea and sclera, which makes the structure stiff. Exogenous collagen cross-linkage is artificially induced with the help of external mediators by using light and dark methods. In this systematic review, we discussed existing literature available on the internet on current evidence-based applications of scleral collagen cross-linking (SXL) by using different interventions. In addition, we compared them in tabular form in terms of their technique, mechanisms, cytotoxicity, and the stage of transition from preclinical to clinical development. Furthermore, we discussed the in-vivo technique to evaluate the post-SXL scleral biomechanical property and outcome in the human eye.


Subject(s)
Collagen , Cross-Linking Reagents , Myopia, Degenerative , Humans , Collagen/chemistry , Collagen/metabolism , Collagen/therapeutic use , Cornea/drug effects , Cornea/metabolism , Cornea/pathology , Cross-Linking Reagents/pharmacology , Myopia, Degenerative/pathology , Sclera/drug effects , Sclera/metabolism , Sclera/pathology
2.
Oman J Ophthalmol ; 15(1): 25-30, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35388239

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude and determinants of refractive error (RE) and related ocular morbidities among preparatory and secondary Saudi students in Riyadh. METHODS: This study was conducted in 2017-2018 at preparatory (12-14 years) and secondary (15-18 years) schools. A "Spot Screener" was used to determine if the child passed or failed a refraction test. Fail test meant RE ≥ ± 0.50 D. Data were collected on refractive status in each eye, anisometropia, and strabismus. The type of RE was estimated and analysis was performed for an association to gender, age, and education levels. The use of spectacle while screening defined the compliance of spectacle wear. RESULTS: The study sample was comprised of 708 Saudi students. There were 59.5% of boys. The prevalence of RE was 43.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.0, 47.3). The prevalence of RE in preparatory and secondary students was 44.5% and 43.2%, respectively. The proportion of myopia (≥ -0.5 D) and hyperopia (≥ +0.5 D) among students with RE was 82.2% and 17.8%, respectively. Family history of RE was positively associated to RE in students (odds ratio: 1.8 [95% CI: 1.3, 2.5]). The current screening initiative identified 45 (6.4%) new cases of RE who required spectacles. The compliance rate for using visual aid among students with RE was 74.6%. The prevalence of anisometropia and strabismus was 3.0% and 4.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of Saudi adolescence in Riyadh have RE. Periodic ophthalmic assessment and refractive services are recommended as part of school health screening initiatives.

3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(2): 458-464, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35086216

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate peripapillary-RNFL thickness in myopia by Cirrus OCT among north Indian population by spherical equivalent (SE), age, gender, and axial length (AL). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study held during 2019-2020. Patients aged 18-60 years underwent ophthalmic examination including retinoscopy, AL, and OCT RNFL thickness. Persons with previous ocular surgery or ocular ailment other than refractive error were excluded. The peripapillary-RNFL thickness was noted and compared by demographic determinants. RESULTS: We examined 300 eyes of 300 persons (mean age: 30.75 ± 8.57 years; 144 males/156 females). Among them, 224 were myopes and 76 were emmetropes (EM). The mean SE was - 3.3 ± 0.4D (range: -11.0D to + 0.37D). The mean AL was 24.61 ± 1.92 mm (22.1-29.5). Overall temporal, nasal, superior, inferior, and mean peripapillary-RNFL thickness was 66.31 ± 7.58, 78.57 ± 16.00, 120.63 ± 11.69, 116.60 ± 15.80, and 95.50 ± 10.84 µm, respectively. Temporal, nasal, superior, inferior, and mean peripapillary-RNFL thickness was 73.97 ± 8.36, 94.84 ± 7.63, 127.96 ± 8.96, 136.89 ± 6.53, and 108.34 ± 6.28 µm, respectively, in EM eyes as compared to 63.71 ± 6.18, 73.05 ± 14.24, 118.21 ± 11.53, 109.71 ± 11.50, and 91.14 ± 8.31 µm, respectively, in myopic eyes (P < 0.001). Association of peripapillary-RNFL thickness with myopia and its different grades was P < 0.001. Association of mean peripapillary-RNFL thickness with age was P > 0.005 and gender was P = 0.168. Correlation between SE and RNFL thickness was positive and significant. Correlation between AL and RNFL thickness was negative but statistically significant. Association of AL with SE was P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: We provide normative peripapillary-RNFL thickness in the north Indian population in order to help in screening for myopia with comorbidity such as glaucoma based on RNFL thickness.


Subject(s)
Myopia , Nomograms , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myopia/complications , Myopia/diagnosis , Myopia/epidemiology , Nerve Fibers , Retinal Ganglion Cells , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Young Adult
4.
Oman J Ophthalmol ; 12(2): 114-118, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31198298

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate the refractive status of young Saudi schoolchildren with a "Spot Screener." SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to July 2016 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Children of kindergarten (3-5 years) and grades 1 and 2 (6-7 years) were screened for refractive error (RE) using the handheld Spot Screener (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA). Data were collected on age, gender, and spectacle use. The pass/fail notation from the Spot Screener and the RE were documented. Children with a "fail" were re-tested with an autorefractor (AR). The rate of agreement was evaluated for the spherical equivalent (SE) from the Spot Screener and AR. RESULTS: We examined 300 schoolchildren and 114 preschool children. The prevalence of RE was 22% in schoolchildren and 25% in preschoolers. There were 183 (61%) hyperopes, 110 (36.7%) myopes, 6 (2%) emmetropes, and 29 (9.7%) astigmats (>2 D cylinder) in grade 1 and 2. There were 85 (74.6%) hyperopes, 22 (19.3%) myopes, 7 (6.1%) emmetropes, and 10 (8.8%) astigmats among preschoolers. The SE differed between the AR and the Spot Screener in 17 (28%) children of 61 failed Spot Screener tests. Accommodation (9, 53%) and high astigmatism (8, 47%) were the main underlying causes of the difference. The Spot Screener could identify RE for the first time in 51 (17%) schoolchildren and 26 (22%) preschoolers. End-users suggested that Spot Screener was child-friendly and quick to test RE. CONCLUSIONS: The Spot Screener could be a good initial screening tool for RE in young schoolchildren.

5.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol ; 26(1): 27-32, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31114121

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The prevalence and determinants of dry eye disease (DED) among 40 years and older population of Riyadh (except capital), Saudi Arabia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A population-based survey was conducted in Riyadh district between 2013 and 2017. All Saudi aged >40 years attended at the Primary Health Center were the study population. McCarty Symptom Questionnaire was adopted. A representative sample was examined. The best-corrected visual acuity and anterior and posterior segment assessment were performed. DED was graded as absent, mild, moderate, and severe. RESULTS: We examined 890 participants. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of DED was 45.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44.8-45.4). One-third of the participants had DED. However, two-third of DED cases were of mild grade. The prevalence of DED among females was significantly higher. The variation of DED by age group was not statistically significant (χ2= 2.6, Degree of freedom = 3, and P = 0.1). Presence of glaucoma was significantly associated to DED (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, [95% CI = 1.2-5.6], and P = 0.01). Use of topical glaucoma medication was significantly associated to DED (OR = 4.6 [95% CI = 1.8-11.8], and P = 0.001). However, severity of DED was not found to be associated with glaucoma medication (χ2= 2.6, P = 0.1). Associations of diabetes and hypertension to DED were not statistically significant (OR = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.73-1.3], and P = 0.84) (OR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.8-1.4], and P = 0.6). The severe visual impairment was not associated to the grade of DED (P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of DED among Saudi is high, but severe DED is found to be less. Association with female gender, glaucoma, and topical glaucoma medications was reported. Association with diabetes, hypertension, and age group variation was not significant.


Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dry Eye Syndromes/diagnosis , Female , Glaucoma/drug therapy , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Sex Distribution , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Saudi J Ophthalmol ; 33(4): 332-337, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31920442

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of glaucoma and its determinants among adult Saudi Residents aged 40 years and older in the Riyadh Governorate (except the Capital). METHODS: A cluster-based sample of randomly selected citizens from six primary health center catchment areas were examined between 2014 and 2015. Data were collected on their glaucoma management. Assessment included measurement of intraocular pressure, optic nerve head evaluation and gonioscopy. Glaucoma suspects were referred for visual field testing. RESULT: A total of 940 citizens were examined and 124 had glaucoma. The prevalence of glaucoma was 5.6% [95% Confidence interval (CI): 5.43-5.75] with an estimated 3758 cases of glaucoma in study area. Males had a significantly higher prevalence (7.62%) than females (3.48%). Glaucoma was not significantly associated to diabetes [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.1; (95% CI: 0.8-1.7); P = 0.5]. The variation in the prevalence of glaucoma by age group was not significant (P = 0.2). Open angle of anterior chamber was in 78% of glaucoma cases. The coverage of glaucoma management was 27.8%. Among known glaucoma patients were 69% were treatment-complaint. Of 124 glaucoma patients, 29 (23.5%) were aware of their diagnosis. Mild and moderate visual impairment was in 67% and 8 (6.5%) glaucoma patients while one (0.8%) patient was bilateral blind. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of glaucoma was high. Identified determinants should be noted and accordingly a public health approach for early detection and adequate management is recommended.

7.
Saudi J Ophthalmol ; 33(4): 363-368, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31920446

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To present the prevalence and determinants of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among more than 40 years old Saudi population. METHODS: A population based survey was conducted in Riyadh district between 2014 and 2017. All Saudi aged >40 years suffering from diabetes and confirmed in the diabetes register of the Primary Health Center (PHC) were the study population. Representative sample was examined. The Best corrected Visual acuity (BCVA), anterior and posterior segment assessment was performed. Digital fundus camera captured the retinal images. DR was graded into No DR, Non-proliferative DR (Mild, Moderate, Severe) and proliferative DR (PDR). Diabetic macular edema (DME) was separately noted. Sight Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy (STDR) included PDR and/or DME. RESULTS: We examined 890 persons. The age sex adjusted prevalence of DR was 44.7% (95% CI 44.1 - 45.3). The DR among male was significantly higher than in females. [RR = 1.4 (95% CI 1.02 - 1.8)]. The DR in 60 plus population was higher compared to 40 to 60 years old diabetics [RR = 1.64 (95% CI 1.6 - 1.7), P < 0.001]. The crude prevalence of STDR was 12.4% (95% CI 9.1 - 15.7). Among diabetic with DR, bilateral and unilateral Severe Visual Impairment (SVI) rate were 1% and 1.8%. The coverage of retinal laser treatment for STDR was 6.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The DR among diabetics is high among adult Saudi population. Both DR and STDR were more in males. Visual disabilities among DR cases were few. For early detection and timely management the services need urgent attention.

8.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 17(1): e74-e79, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28417032

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate ocular healthcare-seeking behaviours and vision screening outcomes of nursing staff at a tertiary eye care hospital. METHODS: This study was conducted between April and September 2016 among all 500 nurses employed at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected on age, gender, use of visual aids, the presence of diabetes, a history of refractive surgery and date of last ocular health check-up. Participants were tested using a handheld Spot™ Vision Screener (Welch Allyn Inc., Skaneateles Falls, New York, USA). RESULTS: A total of 150 nurses participated in the study (response rate: 30.0%). The mean age was 41.2 ± 8.9 years old. Distance spectacles, reading spectacles and both types of spectacles were used by 37 (24.7%), 32 (21.3%) and 10 (6.7%) nurses, respectively. A total of 58 nurses (38.7%) failed the vision screening test. Visual defects were detected for the first time in 13 nurses (8.7%). With regards to regular eye checkups, 77 participants (51.3%) reported acceptable ocular healthcare-seeking behaviours; this factor was significantly associated with age and the use of visual aids (P <0.01 each). CONCLUSION: A high proportion of participants failed the vision screening tests and only half displayed good ocular healthcare-seeking behaviours. This is concerning as ophthalmic nurses are likely to face fewer barriers to eye care services than the general population.


Subject(s)
Eyeglasses/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Vision Screening , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Saudi Arabia , Tertiary Care Centers , Vision Disorders/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...