Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the new EULAR/ACR criteria, particularly for early detection of cSLE, in comparison to the SLICC criteria among the pediatric population in multiple centers in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that enrolled pediatric patients up to the age of 14 years who've been diagnosed with SLE and followed in pediatric rheumatology clinics at 9 multi-tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from 2010 to 2021 as a case group and were compared to a similar group of pediatric patients who've had defined rheumatological diseases other than SLE with a positive ANA titer (≥1:80) as controls. In total, 245 patients were included and distributed as 129 cases (diagnosed by expert pediatric rheumatologists) versus 116 patients in the control group. All relevant clinical information, including history, physical examination findings, and laboratory tests, was documented at the initial presentations. Then, the two sets of SLE classification criteria were applied to both groups to define who's going to meet both or either one of them. The exclusion criteria included those who had insufficient data or had overlapping or undifferentiated diseases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating curve (ROC), and accuracy were calculated for SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria (total scores≥ 10 and ≥ 13). We performed a Chi-squared test to compare sensitivity and specificity of SLICC 2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019. RESULTS: For SLICC (cut-off ≥4 criteria), the sensitivity was found to be 96.9% (95% CI 92.6%-99.4%) and the specificity was 94.8% (95% CI 89.6%-98.32%), with PPV and NPV of 95.4% and 96.5%, respectively. The ROC for it was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.99), and this criterion had an accuracy of 95%. Regarding EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the performance measure showed a sensitivity of 99.2% and a specificity of 86.2%. Similarly, PPV was 88.9%; while NPV was a little higher (99.0%) than SLICC. The ROC for EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.96), and this criterion had an accuracy of 93%. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of either using SLICC or EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), as reflected by a p-value of 0.86 using the Chi-squared test. Although applying the EULAR/ACR with a total score of ≥ 13 revealed lower sensitivity (93.8%) than both the SLICC and the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10), the specificity for it was found to increase up to 91.4% (85.7-96.2%) compared to the (86.2%) specificity of the EULAR/ACR (total score ≥ 10). CONCLUSION: In this cohort among the Saudi population with childhood-onset SLE, the new EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria efficiently enable early detection of SLE, although a more frequent rate of false positives was observed with them. Escalating the total score from ≥ 10 to ≥ 13 in the cSLE population improved the specificity close to that of SLICC 2012. Further prospective studies in pediatrics need to be done for the validation of a cut- off score of ≥ 13 in cSLE rather than the traditional score of ≥ 10 in aSLE.

New or vanishing frontiers: LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The classification and pathogenic basis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are a subject of some controversy. Essentially, JIA is an exclusion diagnosis that represents a phenotypically heterogeneous group of arthritis of unknown origin. Familial aggregation of JIA supports the concept of genetic influence in the pathogenesis of JIA. OBJECTIVE: To present the spectrum of laccase domain-containing 1 (LACC1)-associated juvenile arthritis with clinical, biochemical, and molecular genetic data of a cohort of 43 patients, including 11 previously unpublished cases. METHODS: We studied 11 patients with different categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis from 5 consanguineous families, all from Saudi Arabia, except 2 patients who were of Jordanian ethnicity. Whole-exome sequencing was used to identify the disease-causing variant of LACC1. We also reviewed the clinical spectrum and molecular genetic data of previously published cases of LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis. RESULTS: This study describes 43 (29 females, 14 males) patients from consanguineous multiplex families. Most of the included patients were of Arab origin with 86% having early onset disease. The most frequent categories were systemic (19 patients) and rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular (19 patients). Thirty-seven (86%) had progressive erosive arthritis and 10 (23.3%) had persistent limb lymphedema. None of the patients had features of macrophage activation syndrome. Genetic analysis confirmed LACC1 variant in all patients; 22 patients had common founder mutation (LACC1: c.850T > C,p.C284R), while the others showed different LACC1 variants. All patients were treated aggressively with methotrexate and sequential biologic agents. Most of them showed a poor response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This report expands the pathogenic variants of LACC1 and the clinical spectrum associated with this genetic subset of juvenile arthritis. The predominance of autosomal-recessive inheritance and strong genetic evidence allowed us to propose LACC1-associated juvenile arthritis as a distinct disorder.

The Value of Screening for Celiac Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Single Experience of a Tertiary Medical Center.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-organ inflammatory disease associated with autoimmune diseases. The aim of the study is to assessed the frequency of celiac disease (CD) in adults and children with SLE (aSLE and cSLE, respectively) and compare them with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients; the study also explored the clinical impact of CD serologic markers on SLE disease activity and severity. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with SLE who had regular follow-up in rheumatology clinics were evaluated for laboratory and clinical variables using serology and the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). To assess the occurrence of CD serology in cSLE and aSLE and the clinical impact of CD serologic markers on SLE, patients were tested for antigliadin (AGA), anti-endomysium (EmA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies. RA and JIA patients were included for comparison. Duodenal biopsy was conducted in patients who exhibited CD markers. RESULTS: The CD marker was found in 29 (11.6%) of the 250 patients. AGA was present in seven aSLE patients and tTG in two (11.1%). Among cSLE patients, the autoantibody was present in 17.6% (AGA in four, tTG in two, and EmA in three). For RA patients, five had AGA and tTG and one had EmA, with an overall positivity of 9.7%. Five JIA patients had AGA (four with EmA and five with tTG) with overall positivity of 10.9%; the serum IgA level was normal in all patients except one. Duodenal endoscopic biopsy was performed in patients with positive CD markers (two declined). Histologic confirmation of CD was reported in one RA and one JIA patient but in none of the SLE patients. There was no correlation between the presence of CD markers and autoantibodies in SLE. CONCLUSION: CD antibodies did not influence SLE activity. Thus, SLE patients may not need to be screened for CD antibodies.