The effectiveness of ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in a Canadian centre and determinants of its success.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using ultrasound (US) in North America has been questioned due to the predominance of patients of Caucasian ethnicity and larger body habitus. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of US surveillance for HCC in a Canadian hepatobiliary centre and to identify independent variables associated with early detection of tumour(s). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with first HCC in a US surveillance population at the authors' hospital yielded 201 patients (over a 10.5-year period). Patients were categorized into three groups: regular surveillance (frequency of surveillance ≤12 months [n=109]); irregular surveillance (frequency of surveillance >12 months [n=38]); or first surveillance (tumour detected on first scan [n=54]). The Milan criteria for transplantation and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system were used as outcome measures. Effective surveillance was defined as tumour detection within Milan criteria or curative BCLC stages 0 and A; its association with multiple patient- and disease-related variables was tested. RESULTS: When using the Milan criteria as outcome, 84 of 109 (77%) regular surveillance patients, 23 of 38 (61%) irregular surveillance patients and 40 of 54 (74%) first surveillance patients had tumours meeting the transplantation criteria. The difference between regular and irregular surveillance was statistically significant (P=0.03). When using the BCLC staging system, 87 of 109 (80%) regular surveillance patients, 26 of 38 (68%) irregular surveillance patients and 41 of 54 (76%) first surveillance patients had their tumours detected in BCLC curative stages (0 and A; P=0.11). Regular surveillance was the only variable significantly associated with detection of tumour(s) within the Milan criteria (OR 2.76 [95% CI 1.10 to 6.88]). Tumours detected more recently were more likely to be <2 cm in size (BCLC stage 0; OR 2.38 [95% CI 1.07 to 5.31]). CONCLUSION: A high rate of HCC surveillance success was achieved using US alone when performed regularly in a specialized hepatobiliary centre.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in a large Canadian urban centre: stage at treatment and its potential determinants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a significant difference in tumour stage between patients initially found with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at a tertiary hepatobiliary centre and patients referred with tumours detected elsewhere; and to determine variables associated with referral in a palliative stage. METHODS: A retrospective review of 12,199 patients seen at a liver clinic over a 10.5-year period revealed 236 patients with HCC first detected internally (internal) and 163 who were referred with a known mass (referred). All patients were staged at the time of treatment using the Milan criteria for transplantation and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. Curative disease was defined as BCLC stages 0 and A. In the referred group, univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine which of the following factors were significantly associated with presentation in a palliative stage: age, sex, ethnicity, cause of liver disease, presence of cirrhosis, location of residence and quintile of neighbourhood income. RESULTS: In comparing the internal versus referred patients, significant differences were found in the proportion of patients fulfilling Milan criteria (72% versus 36%), those with curative disease (75% versus 49%) and those with very early stage tumour (BCLC stage 0, 23% versus 7%); all differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). In patients referred for treatment of HCC from an outside institution, none of the variables tested were associated with presentation in a palliative stage. CONCLUSION: Patients with HCC referred to a liver treatment centre were more likely to be in palliative stages than those whose tumour was detected internally.

IgG4 related disease - a retrospective descriptive study highlighting Canadian experiences in diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND: Appreciating the utility of published diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis, when compared to the characteristics of patients clinically managed as having disease, informs and refines ongoing clinical practice. METHODS: Comparative retrospective descriptive evaluation of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis including dedicated radiology review. RESULTS: 66 subjects with radiographic OR clinical features of autoimmune pancreatitis were initially identifiable (Male: n = 50), with 55 confirmed for evaluation. The most common presentation included pain (67%), weight loss (65%), and jaundice (62%). Diffuse enlargement of the pancreas was evident in 38%, whilst multifocal, focal, or atrophic changes were seen in 7%, 33% and 9% respectively. 13% had no pancreatic parenchymal involvement. Peripheral rim enhancement was seen in 23 patients (42%). Where discernible, disease was a) Sclerosing pancreatitis and cholangitis, n = 21; b) Sclerosing cholangitis, n = 9; c) Sclerosing pancreatitis, n = 4; d) Sclerosing pancreatitis and cholangitis with pancreatic pseudotumour, n = 7; e) Sclerosing cholangitis with hepatic pseudotumour, n = 3; f) Sclerosing pancreatitis with pancreatic pseudotumour, n = 1. 56% of the patients had systemic manifestations and the median serum IgG4 at diagnosis was 5.12 g/L. The Korean criteria identified most patients (82%) compared to HISORt (55%) or the Japan Pancreas Society (56%). The majority (HISORt 60%; Japan Pancreas Society 55%; Korean 58%) met diagnostic criterion by radiological findings and elevated serum IgG4. Treatment and response did not differ when stratified by diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSION: Our descriptive and retrospective dataset confirms that in non-expert practice settings, autoimmune pancreatitis scoring systems with a focus on radiology and serology capture most patients who are clinically felt to have disease.

Characterization of 1-to 2-cm liver nodules detected on hcc surveillance ultrasound according to the criteria of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease: is quadriphasic CT necessary?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the essential number of phases from multiphasic CT for 1- to 2-cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on surveillance ultrasound and to compare the results with the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) standard (arterial phase hypervascularity and portal venous phase [PVP] or delayed phase hypovascularity). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 110 newly detected nodules (1-2 cm; 36 HCC, 74 benign) in 96 patients detected in an HCC surveillance program. Three radiologists prospectively evaluated the attenuation of each nodule relative to the liver on each phase of quadriphasic CT. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify parameters associated with HCC. Multiple combinations of phases were compared with the AASLD standard. RESULTS: Only arterial phase hypervascularity and delayed phase hypovascularity were significantly associated with HCC both on univariate (odds ratio, arterial phase 7.51 [95% CI, 2.79-20.20]; delayed phase, 2.80 [1.14-6.90]) and multivariate analyses (arterial phase, 11.30 [4.30-29.68]; delayed phase, 4.39 [1.20-16.13]). The combination of arterial phase and delayed phase yielded the highest specificity (99%) and sensitivity (57%). There was no significant difference between AASLD standard (sensitivity, 57%; specificity, 98%) versus biphasic (arterial phase hypervascularity and delayed phase hypovascularity: sensitivity, 57%; p = 1 and specificity, 99%; p = 0.32), triphasic (arterial phase hypervascularity and unenhanced or PVP hypovascularity: sensitivity, 53%; p = 0.325 and specificity, 97%; p = 0.32), or quadriphasic combination (arterial phase hypervascularity and unenhanced, PVP or delayed phase hypovascularity: sensitivity, 57%; specificity, 97%), whereas the sensitivity of biphasic arterial phase and PVP was significantly lower (39% vs 57%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: For diagnosing 1- to 2-cm HCC detected on surveillance ultrasound, arterial phase and delayed phase are two essential phases, providing higher sensitivity than the combination of arterial phase and PVP, and equal performance with triphasic and quadriphasic combinations. The biphasic combination of arterial phase and delayed phase may replace quadriphasic CT recommended by AASLD.

Indeterminate 1-2-cm nodules found on hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: biopsy for all, some, or none?

UNLABELLED: In the latest hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management guidelines by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, biopsy is advocated for all nodules deemed indeterminate after imaging work-up by contrast-enhanced scans. However, the latest guidelines' imaging work-up algorithm has been shown to improve sensitivity of characterization of HCC for 1-2-cm nodules, decreasing the proportion of HCCs that remain indeterminate after imaging work-up. We undertook a study of 1-2-cm indeterminate nodules to determine what proportions are malignant and which variables can be used to limit biopsy to a subset of nodules at higher risk of malignancy. Eighty consecutive patients with 93 indeterminate nodules were included. Final diagnosis was established in 85 nodules, with 13 malignant (9 by biopsy, 4 by growth) and 72 benign (stability of ≥18 months). Cause of liver disease, ethnicity, size, arterial hypervascularity, venous hypoenhancement, and presence of synchronous typical HCC were analyzed by univariate logistic analysis to determine significant predictors of malignancy. Rate of malignancy among indeterminate 1-2-cm nodules was found to be 14%-23%. Only arterial hypervascularity [odds ratio (OR), 3.7) and presence of synchronous HCC (OR, 7.1) were significant predictors of malignancy. A strategy of limiting biopsy to nodules that had either feature would result in 23 biopsies and potentially detect 8 of 13 malignant nodules, yielding a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 79%. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of malignancy among 1-2-cm indeterminate nodules is low (14%-23%), and biopsy of all such nodules results in many negative results. Limiting biopsy to nodules with arterial hypervascularity or in the presence of a synchronous typical HCC would detect the majority of HCCs while substantially reducing the number of biopsies.

Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1-2-cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively identify magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings that are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 1-2-cm nodules detected at surveillance ultrasonography (US) and to propose newer MR imaging diagnostic criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained, and informed patient consent was waived. Among 145 consecutive patients who had 1-2-cm nodules that were newly detected at surveillance US, 108 patients underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging. After excluding hemangiomas and unconfirmed nodules, the study sample comprised 96 patients with 116 nodules, including 43 HCCs and 73 benign nodules. MR imaging findings were assessed for signal intensity at each sequence. On the basis of the results of univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, several diagnostic criteria were developed by using combinations of MR imaging findings, which were then compared with the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) practice guideline. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed four imaging findings associated with HCC, including arterial phase hyperintensity, portal or delayed phase hypointensity (washout), hyperintensity on T2-weighted images, and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity (P < .001 for each). In the multivariable analysis, arterial phase hyperintensity (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 17.1; P = .003) and washout (adjusted OR, 11.7; P = .007) were associated with HCC. Of the developed criteria, the criteria including nodules fitting the AASLD practice guideline (arterial phase hyperintensity and washout) or nodules having three or more findings were considered most reasonable, showing improved sensitivity (77% [33 of 43] versus 67% [29 of 43], P = .048) and comparable specificity (95% [69 of 73] versus 99% [72 of 73], P = .09), as compared with AASLD practice guideline. CONCLUSION: Alternative MR imaging criteria for diagnosing HCC in 1-2-cm nodules detected at surveillance US that can improve sensitivity compared with the AASLD practice guideline were proposed. A larger study is needed to verify the preliminary criteria in this study. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101549/-/DC1.