Rehabilitation Practitioners' Perceptions of Optimal Sitting and Standing Posture in Men with Normal Weight and Obesity.

The concepts of "optimal posture (OP)" and "harmful posture (HP)" are commonly used, and specific spinal postures can contribute to back pain. However, quantitative descriptions of optimal and harmful standing (StP) and sitting (SP) postures are currently lacking, particularly for different body mass indices (BMIs). Therefore, this study aimed to identify and quantify the OPs and HPs of StP and SP at different BMIs and investigate the attitudes and beliefs of rehabilitation practitioners toward OPs and HPs. Overall, 552 rehabilitation practitioners were recruited to participate in a questionnaire survey to select the optimal position from seven sitting and five standing postures for each BMI healthy volunteer. The segmental relationships of each posture were qualified using the Vicon software. For normal BMI, the physiotherapists chose two SPs (48.19% and 49.64%) and one StP (80.42%) as the OP. One sitting SP (83.7%) and two standing StPs (43.48% and 48.19%) were selected as optimal for obese BMI. All the most commonly selected OPs had an upright lordotic posture, while the postures with slouched spinal curves or forward head postures were almost all selected as HP. Additionally, 96.74% of participants considered education about optimal SP and StP to be "quite" or "very" important. The OP of the StP and SP postures was mostly based on the vertical alignment of gravity lines and sagittal balance. For obese people, the rehabilitation practitioners' observations may be erroneous, and further physical examination is necessary. Rehabilitation practitioners generally believe that postural education is essential in clinical practice.

Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions in patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference of patellofemoral kinematics between weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions in the arthrofibrotic knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Twenty patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction were included in the study. Computed tomography scanner and dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques were used to compare patellofemoral kinematics of the affected knee between weightbearing knee flexion and non-weightbearing knee flexion. In both positions, patellofemoral kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6 DOF) were measured respectively. RESULTS: The patellar lateral tilt angle (p = 0.007) and medial patellar translation (p = 0.043) under the weightbearing condition were significantly decreased compared to the non-weightbearing task between 5° and 15° of knee flexion. The lateral patellar translation during a non-weightbearing task was significantly decreased between 60° and 75° of knee flexion (p = 0.005), and the inferior patellar translation under the weightbearing condition was significantly increased between 45° and 75° of knee flexion (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that patellofemoral kinematics during non-weightbearing positions do not sufficiently represent the patellar tracking during functional weightbearing activities. Our findings of this study establish the clinical relevance and significance of assessing the patellofemoral kinematics under the weightbearing condition when evaluating patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900025977.

Gender differences in knee kinematics during weight-bearing knee flexion for patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint kinematics is important for understanding gender-related dimorphism in developing knee arthrofibrosis and advancement of related treatments. The objective of our study was to investigate gender differences existing in tibiofemoral kinematics and patellar tracking in patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction during weight-bearing knee flexion. METHODS: The tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint kinematics were measured in 30 patients (15 male and 15 female) with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction during a lunge task, using computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system. These data were analyzed for gender differences. RESULTS: The range of tibial rotation, patellar inferior shift, tilt, and flexion were significantly decreased in the affected knee compared to the contralateral knee from 15° to 75° of knee flexion (P ≤ 0.04). Statistically significant difference was detected for medial tibial translation between male and female patients at 60° (P = 0.04) and 75° of knee flexion (P = 0.02). The tibial rotation was significantly decreased at 60° (P = 0.03) and 75° of knee flexion (P < 0.01) in females. The inferior patellar shift in females was significantly lower than that in males at 15° (P = 0.04) and 30° of knee flexion (P = 0.01). The patellar tilt was significantly lower at 60° (P = 0.02) and 75° of knee flexion (P < 0.01) in females compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated a significant effect of gender on knee kinematics in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction during weight-bearing knee flexion. These gender differences in tibiofemoral kinematics and patellar tracking may warrant further investigations to determine implications for making gender-specific surgical treatments and rehabilitation programs.

Knee Extensor Mechanism Strength and Its Relationship to Patellofemoral Kinematics in Individuals With Arthrofibrosis Within 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Performance in strength and assessment of patellar tracking is important for patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: The study was to examine the difference of patellofemoral kinematics between the affected and the contralateral limb and to evaluate the relationship between knee extensor strength and patellofemoral kinematics in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); level of evidence, 3. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS: A prospective cohort of 20 patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction was recruited. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 20 patients who underwent arthroscopic reconstruction of the double-bundle ACL with a hamstring tendon autograft received standardized patellofemoral kinematics testing and knee extensor strength testing within 6 months after primary ACL reconstruction. Computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging were used to evaluate in vivo patellofemoral kinematics of affected and contralateral knees during a lunge task. Knee extensor mechanism strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A limb symmetry index of knee strength and patellar mobility was calculated and satisfactory performance defined as ≥90%. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in the range of patellar inferior shift (P = .020; d = 0.81), flexion (P = .026; d = 0.95), lateral tilt (P = .001; d = 1.04), and lateral rotation (P < .001; d = 0.89) in the affected knee compared with the contralateral knee from 15° to 75° of knee flexion. There was a strong positive linear correlation between knee extensor strength and patellar inferior shift (r = .747; P = .008). A knee extensor strength limb symmetry index <90% was 89% sensitive and 9% specific for limited patellar inferior shift. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction presented decreased patellar mobility in the arthrofibrotic knee compared with the contralateral knee. The strong correlation between knee extensor strength and patellar inferior shift of the arthrofibrotic knee demonstrates the importance of knee extensor strength in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with knee arthrofibrosis. The knee extensor mechanism strength has high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying a decrease in patellar inferior shift in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction.

Effects of lumbosacral orthoses on postural control in individuals with or without non-specific low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of lumbosacral orthoses (LSOs) on postural control in individuals with or without non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). METHODS: Individuals with NSLBP (n = 28) and healthy controls (n = 28) were enrolled to assess the postural control with or without LSOs. Postural control was tested using the Balance Master® NeuroCom system by the modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance. RESULTS: Relative to controls, patients with NSLBP had deficits in postural control with greater center of pressure (COP) sway velocity when standing on firm surface (with eyes open: p = 0.002; with eyes closed: p = 0.002) and standing on foam surface (with eyes open: p = 0.024; with eyes closed: p < 0.001). In the braced condition, the COP sway decreased in all subjects with or without NSLBP when standing on foam surface. There was no significant difference in the effect of LSOs on postural control between NSLBP group and healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Individuals with NSLBP have poorer postural control than controls. LSOs seem to improve postural control when standing on unstable surfaces in subjects with or without NSLBP. The effect of LSOs on postural control may not depend on the level of baseline.